Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Fair Traders Are Beginning to Win on Policy

Posted by David Sirota at 4:15 AM on February 6, 2009.


The progressive fair trade movement is gaining real ground and winning the broader political debate.
images8

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Coming from the Financial Times -- the paper of record for Big Money -- this story is really an incredible sign that the progressive fair trade movement is gaining real ground and winning the broader political debate:

The most striking thing about the debate within Washington is how long the measures took to get noticed -- and how little they are perceived as a protectionist act ...The dwindling band of free-trade Democrats on Capitol Hill has been almost completely silent ...

Looking at the political environment and Barack Obama's own journey to the White House, perhaps that is not surprising. Along with his well-known criticisms of the effect on jobs and wages of deals such as NAFTA, Obama's campaign singled out Buy American as a symbol of economic patriotism.

The Washington reaction to Buy American suggests that much of Congress and the Obama White House, while still respecting existing treaty commitments, is not going to go out of its way to placate protesting trading partners. The judgment most experts made – that free traders within the Obama administration will have to spend most of their time playing defense -- has thus far been vindicated.

 

As with every story on this topic in the traditional media, the word "protectionist" is irresponsibly thrown around without any interest in defining the term, nor even a half-sentence noting that with corporate agriculture subsidies and massive protections for intellectual property, patents and copyrights, we already live in a protectionist economy.

It's also not clear why someone would say it's "striking" that simple procurement rules that have nothing to do with tariffs aren't "perceived as a protectionist act." Why is that striking? These rules have nothing to do with tariff protections.

But that sound and fury are to be expected. The real news here is that we're winning. We're winning votes in the Congress, and we're winning elections on fair trade themes and we're winning the broader debate. We're dragging Washington -- kicking and screaming -- back toward the center of American public opinion.

Digg!

Tagged as: congress, fair trade, protectionist

David Sirota was the top spokesman for Democrats on the House Appropriations Committee. He is currently writing a book on the middle class economic squeeze for Crown Publishers. You can contact him at Davidsirota.com.


Copenhagen: Getting Past the Urgency Trap
Copenhagen is the next step forward, and we’ll accept it with greater equanimity if we understand that conventional thinkers have to work their toward deeper transformation
Post by Sara Robinson. November 28, 2009.
Hey Gov. Kaine, Restore Voting Rights for Felons
This is pretty basic, folks.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 28, 2009.
Selling Out Democracy in Honduras: The U.S. and the Honduran Election
Honduras' November 29 election has been rightfully scorned as a sham by political leaders across the hemisphere. With the exception, that is, of President Obama.
Post by Isabel Macdonald. November 28, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?