Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coal Companies Spend Staggering Revenue on Advertising, Not Cleaner Technology or Safety

Posted by Josh Dorner, Sierra Club at 11:56 AM on January 13, 2009.


And what did the famously loquacious industry mouthpiece have to say about the sludge spill? Not a single word.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Water in your
mailbox!

 

If there was any remaining doubt that coal is about the farthest possible thing from clean, it was dispelled by the disastrous coal sludge spill in Tennessee that happened over the holidays.  The spill destroyed houses and has covered a swath of rural Tennessee in over a billion gallons of toxic coal sludge. It has not only exposed the oft-hidden dangers of the coal industry, but also the lax government oversight of one of our country’s dirtiest industries.

A new Center for American Progress report showed that the coal industry's infamous front group, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, spent a staggering $45 million last year on its deceptive "America's Power" campaign touting the benefits of so-called "clean coal." In addition, the coal and electric utility industries spent a jaw-dropping $125 million in the first 9 months of last year lobbying against federal legislation promoting clean energy and a cap on global warming pollution.

While it has plenty to spend on ads touting so-called "clean coal," King Coal refuses to puts its money where its mouth is. Even as it spends millions to run ads implying that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is here or just around the corner, the industry refuses to spend much of anything to turn its overheated rhetoric into reality. And it's not for lack of funds. The 48 companies that make up the ACCCE front group pulled down a combined $57 billion in profits in 2007 alone, yet over a period of several years they have invested just $3.5 billion in research into CCS.

And what did the famously loquacious industry mouthpiece have to say about the sludge spill? Not a single word.

Deception over the airwaves is one thing, but deception on the ground that puts the public health at risk is far worse. Despite initial assurances by government officials that the toxic coal sludge posed no danger, it later became clear that the

sludge was contaminating vast areas with a toxic brew of arsenic

, mercury, selenium, and other highly dangerous substances.

It also turns out that the Tennessee Valley Authority is trying to do business on the cheap. After ignoring problems with the now-breached impoundment that could've been fixed for just $25 million, the utility's ratepayers will now foot the bill for a cleanup that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars.  For example, a 2005 coal sludge spill in Pennsylvania that was 63 times smaller than the Tennessee spill cost $37 million to clean up.

Oh, and in case you were wondering, there's a mere 1300 other unregulated, unmonitored coal ash impoundments across the country. 

 

Digg!

Tagged as: global warming, climate change, coal, tennessee, clean coal, mountaintop removing, mining, spill, tva

Josh Dorner is a writer for the Sierra Club.


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
We Can Fix a Broken Immigration System... Here's How
Outside pressure is the key to finally winning this fight.
Post by Rachel LaBruyere. November 20, 2009.
Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
Post by Steve Benen. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
70 degrees in SF for last few days
Posted by: sonofloud on Jan 13, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been enjoying it but um is it supposed to be 70 degrees in January?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

80 Degrees in North Dallas for much of the past week
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Feb 10, 2009 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everybody here is thrilled, but is it supposed to be 80 degrees in the first week of February?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]