Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Are the 'Winds of Change' Coming to Iran?

Posted by Karl Burkart, Mother Nature Network at 2:44 PM on January 5, 2009.


Activists in Iran are hoping to replace nuclear power with wind power.
windsiran
Photo: The plains of Bushehr, Iran by Ahmad

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

It is a little known fact that Iran, a country which according to the US Energy Information Administration has the 3rd largest oil reserve and the 2nd largest natural gas reserve in the world, is actively pursuing renewable energy sources.  Blessed with some of the best wind and solar resources in the Middle East, Iran hopes to gain economic and political leverage by harnessing these natural resources while preserving their fossil fuel commodities for future export. It's a win-win for everyone.  Iran can power its own development without the highly troubling political implications of an expanded nuclear program, and it gets to maintain its strategic oil reserves.  

But there is a problem.  US and EU sanctions prevent technology companies from making any investments in Iran whatsoever, even investments which would support the decommissioning of its nuclear program by providing viable and quick-to-market alternatives.  Fines are heavy -- upwards of 1 million dollars.  The Danish wind power company Vestas was recently forced to pull out of a 15 year contract with Iranian wind farm Saba Niroo, due to heavy political pressures.

As Nader Niktabe, director of Saba Niroo said,  "It's ironic that the West is so vehemently opposed to Iran's efforts to develop nuclear energy (while) it is sabotaging our efforts to develop clean energy sources like wind." The Saba Niroo wind project is now dead, with 50 huge, 70 foot long wind blades lying idle in its warehouse yard. The company may go bankrupt in six months if it is unable to complete and sell the wind turbines.

One group of US activists is hoping to help bring the "Winds of Change" to Iran and the Middle East, by urging Congress to selectively lift the ban for Iranian companies that would promote renewable energy -- wind and solar.  I recently heard a talk by Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin, co-founders of the organization Code Pink, who led a citizen diplomacy mission to Iran focusing on women's rights.  

The group met covertly with several activist organizations in Iran, as well as with appointed Iranian leaders.  They learned that despite an extremely unpopular government (President Ahmadinejad is considered by most educated Iranians to be a "joke") Iranians are passionate about their country becoming more modern and having sustained peaceful relations with the western world.

A private company called Winds of Change was formed this month.  It will allow individuals to fund the wind project in Iran at $5 per share.  The goal is to raise interim capital to keep the hope of safe and affordable wind energy alive in Iran, while at the same time urging president-elect Obama to lift the ban on renewable investments in the troubled nation.

via: Common Dreams

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, middle east, wind power, activists, nuclear power, iran wind power, winds of change, iranian leaders


Idaho Republican Blake Hall Fired for Throwing Used Condoms on the Lawn of a Woman He Was Stalking
"It's unimaginable that a 56-year-old would be so deviant."
Post by Steven D.. November 10, 2009.
Fox Mogul Rupert Murdoch Echoes Glenn Beck, Calls Obama a Racist
So much for the supposed "truce" between Fox and the White House.
Post by Steve Benen. November 10, 2009.
Shooting at Portland Office Park; 2 Dead, 2 Wounded
Police confirm that two people have been killed and two wounded in a suburban Portland drug-testing facility.
Post by AlterNet Staff. November 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They lose either way
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jan 6, 2009 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran is being destroyed for the interest of the few elite. They don't want Iran a power house but to be invaded and destroyed for their Middle East Union. It's part of the PNAC.

Our country's leaders back the Zionist plan for the ME wars and land grab regardless of the Israeli and American protests. Their loyalities are misplaced. This political attack on alternative energy in Iran just shows that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beating up another country for no reason makes no sense.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 6, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There may be reasons of world security for the US and the EU to block outside help in developing Iran's nuclear power industry (although I'm even skeptical of this); but just why in hell should the US or EU block benign investment such as wind farms in Iran? What right does any nation have to fine another sovereign nation to prevent trade?

(And, just how would the US/EU react if foreign companies refused to pay fines or to stop trading with Iran? With military force? With even more trade sanctions, in this case against a European country? Strongarm tactics invariably fail, because they produce only resistance, which leads to more force being used, which leads to more resistance, and on and on, benefitting no one.)

This is the ugly side of gobalization, which was supposed to stimulate free trade between nations. Instead, "free trade" agreements are used as weapons by bullying nations to shape world policy as they want it, and by multi-national corporations (with the help of certain nations like the US) to attempt to gain world-wide domination over certain markets.

And what will be the fallout from restricting foreign investment in benign green technologies for Iran? Instead of a spirit of cooperation being created, which usually leads to lessened tensions, Iran will dig in its heels even further and feel even more justified in lashing out against its unfair treatment.

I understand that Iran poses a potential danger to its neighbors, and even the world, with its nuclear program and its support of Hezbullah and other terrorist groups. But the US and EU should concentrate on attacking these threats directly, not stepping on Iran's neck by using economic sanctions, and the threat of force, to strangle another sovereign nation. This tactic, so favored by the Bush administration, has not worked anywhere it has been tried, and is a major reason why the US is hated throughout the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can you imagine what the US and Europe would do to Iran if Iran grew INDUSTRIAL HEMP for energy ?
Posted by: jwverez on Jan 6, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I'll bet the picture wouldn't be pretty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]