Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Krugman on Obama's Massive Tax Cuts Plan: 'Bad News'

Posted by Rachel Weiner, Huffington Post at 10:55 AM on January 5, 2009.


Paul Krugman worries that President-elect Obama is relying too much on tax cuts in his stimulus plan in an effort to appease Republicans.
spkrugmanlarge

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In a blog post, economist Paul Krugman worries that President-elect Barack Obama is relying too much on tax cuts in his stimulus plan in an effort to appease Republicans.

[T]here's a reasonable economic case for including a significant amount of tax cuts in the package, mainly in year one.

But the numbers being reported -- 40 percent of the whole, two-year plan -- sound high. And all the news reports say that the high tax-cut share is intended to assuage Republicans; what this presumably means is that this was the message the off-the-record Obamanauts were told to convey.

And that's bad news.

Politico reported Sunday night that 40 percent of the plan's cost will come from tax breaks.

"Obama strategists say he wants to get 80 or more votes in the 100-member Senate, and the emphasis on tax cuts is a way to defuse conservative criticism and enlist Republican support," Mike Allen relays.

The Wall Street Journal adds:

The Obama tax-cut proposals, if enacted, could pack more punch in two years than either of President George W. Bush's tax cuts did in their first two years. Mr. Bush's 10-year, $1.35 trillion tax cut of 2001, considered the largest in history, contained $174 billion of cuts during its first two full years, according to Congress's Joint Committee on Taxation. The second-largest tax cut -- the 10-year, $350 billion package engineered by Mr. Bush in 2003 -- contained $231 billion in 2004 and 2005.

The largest piece of tax relief in the new plan would involve cuts for people who pay income taxes or who claim the earned-income credit, a refund designed to lessen the impact of payroll taxes on low- and moderate-income workers. This component would serve as a down payment on the "Making Work Pay" proposal Mr. Obama outlined during his election campaign, giving a credit of $500 per individual or $1,000 per family.

Obama is expected to detail his economic vision in a meeting Monday with congressional leaders. While the president-elect was hoping to have a stimulus package on his desk by January 20, but now leaders on the Hill are saying it will take until at least mid-February. Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs calls a bill by inauguration "very, very unlikely."

Obama met with Speaker Nancy Pelosi Monday to work on his economic plan.

"The reason we are here today is because the people's business cannot wait," Obama said. "The speaker and her staff have been extraordinarily helpful in working with our team so we can shape an economic recovery plan and start putting people back to work."

Digg!

Tagged as: policy, republicans, economy, obama, conservatives, taxes, tax cuts, jobs, paul krugman, economic crisis


After Conceding, Then Unconceding, Then Conceding, Then Unconceding, NY Conservative Concedes
Doug Hoffman today issued a statement in which he admitted Bill Owens won the NY-23 special election.
Post by Amanda Terkel. November 24, 2009.
China on Reducing Its Carbon Footprint: Why Should We Have to?
They've got a point. Per capita, China only produces 20 percent of America's carbon emissions.
Post by Robert Dreyfuss. November 24, 2009.
Supremes to Decide if Idle Rich's Scenic Ocean Views More Important than Public Beaches, the Environment
A popular coastal reclamation program is being threatened by short-sighted scumbags.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 24, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Memo
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 5, 2009 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Memo to Democrats:

You have control of both houses of congress and the white house. You seem not to have noticed that quite yet, given that you are all still walking on eggshells as if you still had an immediate election to win.

Perhaps if we had a bit more tax cutting for those who are not wealthy over the last 8 years we wouldn't be in quite as bad a mess as we are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I trust Krugman over the Murdoch-owned WSJ anyday
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 5, 2009 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Appeasing the Republics is exactly what they want. They have bluffed the Congressional Democrats into believing they have much more power than they actually do.

Do they NOT REMEMBER THE THREAT OF "The Nuclear Option?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Way to go,appeasers
Posted by: dougo on Jan 6, 2009 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is starting to sound more and more like he is going to make the same mistakes Clinton made and that is he believes he can work with the republicans.Big mistake.The republicans don't give a shit about cutting my taxes or any working stiff for that matter.
Think back over the past thirty years or more and you realize the republicans don't bargain for anything.When republicans were the majority they came up with a bill and they passed it,with or without you.The democrats usually weren't allowed to introduce amendments and if republicans did allow amendments they were shot down like invading bombers and the bill was jammed down democrats throats,like it or not.Afterward they would hold press conferences and gloat saying they defeated the democrats attempts at obstructionism or loading a bill up with pork.

President elect Obama would do well to take a lesson and govern with the same zeal.As long as republicans believe they have some remaining power they will continue to dominate and obstruct for the benefit of the haves and have mores.If you want to make a deal,make it beneficial to all.If that doesn't agree with them,cram it down their throat.They need to taste their own medicine.

You see dear dem leaders,when you negotiate with somebody you are supposed to give something and then, you get something in return.Republicans not filibustering is not something tangible.
I believe the smart thing to do in this case is to introduce a stimulus package which benefits people making less than $100,000 a year and invests in infrastructure and job creation.If republicans don't vote for it let them filibuster and crash the economy.They will seal their own fate and at the same time allow the entire country see just what is important to them and what their party stands for.

This may be a heavy price to pay for many Americans in terms of economic uncertainty but eventually the country will come out of the malaise and the republican party will be extinct.

You cannot negotiate with an asshole,a madman, or a senator such far away places as Oz,or Alabama,Texas,Tennessee,Georgia,Kentucky or Mississippi, and these republicans seem to be guilty of both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Way to go,appeasers Posted by: JSquercia
Jobs over tax cuts
Posted by: AlterEg0 on Jan 6, 2009 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tax cuts are wrong. Dead wrong. $500 a year won't fix anything. Why not bring jobs back from China? The jobs that pay decent money. The jobs that will give a taxpayer more than lousy $500 a year. On that, we can PAY taxes, and the government will have money to spend on infrastructure and social services. Jobs, Mr. Obama. Jobs, not tax cuts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Obama does Bush redux--he will be a one-termer
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Jan 6, 2009 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the Democratic backbone? Oh, I forgot--afraid of a a filibuster. When will the Democrats make the R's actually filibust? And stand there holding the floor till the old farts fall down?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop Taxing Umemployment Benefits and Social Security
Posted by: JSquercia on Jan 6, 2009 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have asked Obama to consider as part of his stimulous package doing away with the Federal Income Tax on Unemployment Benefits as well as that on Social Security Benefits . These were both instituted by Ronald Reagan .
Losing a good paying job with benefits and then receiving far less in Uneployment is bad enough but having that amount treated as incone is worse . Add to that the fact that even with COBRA you have to pay a substantial part of your benefit for health Insurance .
The deal on Social Security Benefits is that it was supposed to only apply to so called upper income seniors . EXCEPT they " neglected" to index the amount at which you were considered Upper Income . So 25 years later more and more people fall into this category.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

appease
Posted by: sherman on Jan 6, 2009 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
UNCLE TOM

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]