Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Killing the Messenger: Journalists Targeted in Gaza

Posted by Jennifer Utz, Huffington Post at 3:33 AM on January 2, 2009.


Israeli air strikes have made reporting from Gaza nearly impossible.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Watch the broadcast media's live coverage of the current conflict in the Middle East, and you'll see correspondents doing stand-ups in Israeli cities like Jerusalem and Ashkelon. But virtually no reporters are actually on the front lines in Gaza.

That's because for nearly two months, the Israeli government has prevented foreign journalists from entering the territory.

In an open letter filed on behalf of 400 international reporters, the Tel-Aviv-based Foreign Press Association said:

"In an unprecedented restriction of press freedom, the Gaza Strip has been closed to the foreign press. As a result the world's media is unable to accurately report on events inside Gaza at this critical time."

In a reassuring turn of events, the Israeli Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the government to allow the international media into Gaza.

As a result, Israel must now allow up to 12 journalists to enter Gaza whenever it opens the Erez Crossing, the only passenger gateway into the territory.

Still, recent press freedom within Gaza is restricted and dangerous.

Parts of the strip have been declared "closed military zones," most notably of which is the Gaza strip's northern boundary with Israel, which extends two miles into Israeli territory. As a result, journalists are restricted from entering the area to report on what's happening.

A more frightening assault on press freedom is repeat behavior from Israel's 2006 war with Hezbollah in Lebanon; Israel is once again using air strikes to target journalists.

On Sunday, the Gaza City headquarters of the Hamas-operated Al-Aqsa TV were bombed by Israeli Defense Forces.

In response, the Committee to Protect Journalists issued a statement:

"Under international humanitarian law, journalists are entitled to the same protections as all civilians. We are alarmed...by the military's targeting of a media outlet. It is not permissible to target journalists even if their coverage is openly partisan."

Similarly, in the 2006 war with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Israeli jets destroyed the five-story headquarters of Hezbollah's Al-Manar television.

During that war, Israeli forces also singled out other media infrastructure; aerial attacks on telecommunications devices killed and injured people working for the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation and Tele-Liban.

On July 22, 2006, Israeli fighter aircraft chased a convoy of Al-Jazeera, Al-Arabiya, and Al-Manar vehicles, and fired missiles on the road behind them, even though their cars were clearly marked 'Press' and 'TV."

As is with the current situation with Gaza, when Israel is performing air strikes, everyone is vulnerable -- militants, civilians, and journalists alike.

I spoke with Ewa Jasiewicz, human rights activist and writer, and coordinator of the Free Gaza Movement, who's been in Gaza for two and a half weeks. Because of the ban on foreign journalists, she's given nearly thirty interviews in past few days, and has been asked to write stories for a number of news organizations, including the Guardian and The Daily Telegraph.

She says local journalists feel they're being targeted. She spent last night at the headquarters of the Palestinian news agency, Ramattan. Fearing the worst, they'd taken out all their windows, and shortly thereafter, a number of bomb blasts shook the building.

Jasiewicz says of Ramattan,

"They are not moving around at night. They don't have flak jackets, they don't have helmets. They're not like Reuters, CNN, or BBC. They're low-budget, but they get the best pictures, and they've been on the front lines."

With sporadic electricity, local media are having a difficult time operating to begin with. Fearing targeted air strikes, a number of local radio stations have chosen to cease operations.

Says Jasiewicz, "Journalists have said to me 'It doesn't matter if you're a journalist, paramedic ... foreigner, or Palestinian. They don't care."


The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Hey Netherlands: Fox "News" Hates You! (VIDEO)
Oh, it's not just the pot and the hookers ...
Post by PZ Myers. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What Israel hates most of all?
Posted by: weathered on Jan 2, 2009 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Getting caught in the headlights of their very own remarkable arrogance and diabolic deceit and having absolutely no one else to manipulate blame on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think
Posted by: pkricker on Jan 2, 2009 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we really need is a United Nations with teeth that can go in and tell a rogue nation, ANY rogue nation, "you can't do this". I'm afraid that what is happening with Israel is akin to what happens when an abused child grows up to be a child abuser. There needs to be some sort of intervention. Wouldn't it be nice if the US simple withheld all support of Israel until they stopped acting like Nazis?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I think Posted by: Gisele
» RE: I think Posted by: weathered
» RE: I think Posted by: Gisele
» RE: I think Posted by: weathered
» RE: I think Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I think Posted by: Basenjis
My guess is the reason Israel won't allow journalists into Gaza...
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 2, 2009 12:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is because they are on the brink of a ground invasion, and it wouldn't help their cause if actual journalists with actual cameras caught on tape the TRUTH about what they're doing.

The only reason NOT to allow journalists into Gaza is the Israeli government would lose the ability to control what the world sees. If they keep them out, they control the message, and we can all see the way the media is spinning this. Israel is getting what it wants as long as journalists are reporting from Israel, not Gaza.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT WORTH THE RISK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 2, 2009 1:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not possible for a reporter to go into the area knowing that the situation is on the brink of becoming a full blown ground war. For anyone who is curious there are many bloggers at work in the areas affected. Check out Israeli bloggers, Palistinian bloggers, MidEast Online, DebkaFile, etc. There's a ton of stuff available. Incidentally, you'll find both sides of the story on each side. I think there's more opposition than approval for Israel's acions. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The unmeasured response
Posted by: carl baydala on Jan 3, 2009 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The friends of Israel will say that the incursion and manner of the response by the IDF is a measured one.

Well, measuring war seems to be a highly subjective thing as any objective observer can now determine. I would liken the Israeli attack on Gaza to that of the warden of a prison trying to teach the inmates a lesson. The warden has decided that all should suffer as a consequence of the actions of a few. This is the same kind of response that one would expect when emotions are out of control. The basis of this emotional response just might lie in religion, such as for example, an eye for eye, etc. God has determined that is OK to enact justice by harming those who have harmed you.

But, the Israeli response is faulty logic and bad religion in my opinion. It creates a poor emotional response this religion does. And, there is no gain to speak of since the guilt of killing has landed on the killer's doorstep as well.

To enact revenge accomplishes nothing; it only breeds more hate. Hate is that thing which comes about from a lack of power; a power to achieve one's desired objectives. And, you are certainly not going to gain more power or achieve your objectives when you keep on alienating people by killing innocent or unarmed and undefended people.

The Israeli assault will fail and accomplish nothing. The killing and targeting of innocent reporters trying to tell the world what is going on only adds to the negative opinion of the State of Israel.

To call the invasion of Gaza a measured response is to betray the meaning of language as the civilized world understands it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Live reporting from Gaza on "Flashpoints" 1/2/09
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jan 3, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=30249

I've heard live reports from war zones before but I've never heard journalists sobbing on air. Be prepared to have an experience of the carnage, fear and despair as though you were actually there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Strange thing I noticed in this story...
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 3, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"As a result, Israel must now allow up to 12 journalists to enter Gaza whenever it opens the Erez Crossing, the only passenger gateway into the territory."

Why "up to 12" journalists? Why that number? Is it just some arbitrary number pulled out of the air? And who, exactly, will those 12 be? Who decides? And what is the determining factor?

This stinks to high heaven, as far as I'm concerned. My prediction is that the Israeli government will choose 12 journalists sympathetic to their side. I guess we will find out as soon as we start seeing reporting from inside Gaza.

When over 400 journalists signed the letter demanding access, it seems very strange that they came up with such a low number as 12.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Open Admission
Posted by: blackie4aces on Jan 3, 2009 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Israel's actions are legitimate, then why exclude press coverage? Could even the Israelis know not-so-very-deep-down that this exercise of shooting fish in a barrel is actually murder?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

for the Obama Administration to focus all efforts
Posted by: outreachmin on Jan 4, 2009 12:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My opt is for the Obama Administration to focus all efforts toward fixing whats wrong with our own country (based on research done by both myself and a multitude of other scientist black and white alike). Our effort, the one that is responsible for building and continuing to build the very foundations of this nation does not need to be diluted with foreign affairs that precede our own history and take away from this much warranted effort.

I feel Obama needs to be remembered in history not only for becoming the first black president but also for establishing a counterpart to the Dept of Defense fittingly named "The Department of PEACE." The afore mentioned was an idea of U.S. Senator Dennis Kucinich's when he made his bid for the highest office in the land.

My prayers go out to anyone including former U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney that was injured or harmed in any way (physically or psychologically) in this incident, past acts of aggression, as well as, any unwarranted future acts of war against anyone anywhere. My understanding of PEACE and what it entails is not up for argument nor negotiations.

Min W D Patterson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]