Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How Fumbling the Bailout Led to the Chicago Sit In

Posted by Ian Welsh, Firedoglake at 9:59 AM on December 8, 2008.


Bank of America could have kept Republic Windows open if they hadn't been distracted buying up their competitors.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace in your
mailbox!

 

Over the last couple months I've warned that one main reason banks aren't lending, and are cutting off credit lines to businesses and individuals, is because they are hoarding money in order to buy competitors. In the Chicago factory sit in, the key moment which caused Republic Windows to shut down was when Bank of America cut off their line of credit, which they did just before they approved a $50 billion takeover of Merrill Lynch.

Bank of America has bought out LaSalle Bank and Countrywide, and bank shareholders just approved a $50 billion buyout of Merrill Lynch. B of A has recently settled the largest suit against Countrywide.

Meanwhile, according to a source familiar with the nature of the bank's finances, Bank of America has issued $9 billion of secured debt insured by the FDIC. Yet, as with almost all banks, it has been tightening its credit to businesses and consumers.

A lot of banks still have plenty of money. Bank of America has plenty of money. The amount of money required to keep Republic Windows open is trivial to them -- $10 million, perhaps.

But right now, they as with other banks, are keeping their powder dry. Money loaned out can't be used to buy up competitors at cents on the dollar.

If the Feds are serious about getting banks to lend again they have to make it clear that failed banks will no longer be sold to their competitors at fire sale prices but will instead be put in receivership and held for years before any sale is considered. This needs to be explicit policy. Until they do, banks will horde cash, looking for their chance at once in a lifetime buying opportunities. All that will happen to the money being given to the banks is that they will use it for more buyouts.

And more businesses like Republic Windows will go under because their lines of credit were withdrawn.

Digg!

Tagged as: chicago, bank of america, bailout, republic windows

Ian Welsh is the managing editor of The Agonist and a sometime contributor to FDL and the Huffington Post.


Prison Officials Have Banned an Inmate From Reading Obama’s Books
Obama wrote that “the dealth penalty does little to deter crime” and said "no innocent person should end up on death row.”
Post by Ian Millhiser. July 10, 2009.
The Evilest of Evil CEOs Swiftboating Health Reform
This guy's a creep with millions to burn.
Post by Digby. July 10, 2009.
More Right-Wing Whining Over Media's Coverage of Sarah Palin
Ho-hum, the poor misunderstood woman.
Post by Eric Boehlert. July 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
HUH ???
Posted by: gellero1 on Dec 8, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a privately owned company. So who are the owners??

The company is not bankrupt. Has this reporter seen their books??

What exactly does B of A have to do with the employer's obligations??

This analysis lacks facts. The media is again being sucked into the 'Rope a Dope' propaganda machine of whoever !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HUH ??? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: HUH ??? Posted by: Quannah
Great.
Posted by: buh on Dec 8, 2008 5:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My tax dollars that bank of america has been given to prop up the economy by making loans available are not being used for that purpose but rather to acquire more banks so they can also not lend their (the acquired banks) money out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

question
Posted by: justacitizen on Dec 8, 2008 7:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it assumed the only way out of this mess is through the encouragement of more borrowing? We the people have enough debt. It's time we the people start receiving proportionate wage increases above and beyond the governments cpi index. We the people have not seen credible wages or wage increases for years, yet the cost of everything we consume goes up and up. Think of the increase in the demand for consumer goods if we the people (all the people) received a respectable wage for the work we do. We the people could manage our debt if we received decent wages. I believe it is time all companies tie wage increases for all it's employees to the wage increases the CEO's receive. It is not difficult to observe the actions and the rhetoric from DC -over the years-, to conclude that there is intentional and willful actions to further enhance the super wealthy keep money from the poorer classes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The banksters are doing what they said they would do
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Dec 9, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just after the 700 billion bailout was voted through, I heard a pundit on an NPR program, who sounded totally bored, saying that the recipients of the bailout money were issuing statements that they might not use the money to issue credit to borrowers and get the financial markets flowing again as intended, but that instead they were considering acquisitions and mergers, paying down debt, and paying bonuses to their people. How it ever got any further than that, I'll never understand, but then I don't understand half the bizarre shit going on in the corporatocracy nowadays. It's in this same bizarro world that CEO's of the big three automakers would travel to DC on separate private jets and hold out their hands for corporate welfare without even a statement or a flow chart or an outline of how they would use this taxpayer money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]