Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's Worst Midnight Regulation Yet

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 4:00 AM on December 4, 2008.


This latest assault is on clean water and it may be Bush's worst one yet.
islandcreekaerial1

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Water in your
mailbox!

 

There are great running lists of all Bush's midnight regulations as he secures his infamous place as the "worst president ever" in our country's annals. Apparently not satisfied with nearly eight years of environmental rollbacks, deregulation, and blatant disregard for air, water, and climate, his latest midnight regulation may be one of the worst environmental assaults yet.

The Washington Post confirmed today that a ruling was approved to make it easier for coal companies to dump the rock and dirt waste that is blown off the tops of mountains in "mountaintop removal" (or MTR) coal mining into streams and valleys:

The rule is one of the most contentious of all the regulations emerging from the White House in President Bush's last weeks in office ...
A coalition of environmental groups said the rule would accelerate "the destruction of mountains, forests and streams throughout Appalachia."
Edward C. Hopkins, a policy analyst at the Sierra Club, said: "The E.P.A.'s own scientists have concluded that dumping mining waste into streams devastates downstream water quality. By signing off on this rule, the agency has abdicated its responsibility."

MTR has been devastating to the ecosystems and communities of Appalachia and this latest ruling further threatens surface and groundwater water.

But the people of Appalachia are not going to take this one lying down and neither should the rest of us. We've got a new president coming in who once vowed, "We have to find more environmentally sound ways of mining coal than simply blowing the tops off mountains." So let's hold him accountable.

We can begin with four recommendations from iLoveMountains.org:

1. Reverse the Bush Mine Waste Giveaway: On his first day in office, Obama should reverse the lame-duck Bush administration rules that have allowed Big Coal to dump toxic mine waste into streams and rivers.

2. Enforce Existing Laws: For eight years, the Bush administration has refused to enforce the Clean Water Act and other environmental rules, allowing Big Coal to ignore our nation's laws with few if any consequences. Obama should demand that these and other rules be enforced, and hold the EPA, Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation, and Enforcement, and the Army Corps of Engineers responsible.

3. Prioritize Appalachia in America's Clean Energy Future: The mountaintops of Appalachia provide a valuable wind energy resource -- a resource that is severely impacted or destroyed by mountaintop removal coal mining. Obama should mandate Environmental Impact Assessments and economic analyses as part of his New Energy for America Plan. With finite declining coal reserves and jobs, Obama needs to ensure Appalachia receives attention and support in the Administration's new energy plan -- which includes a $150 billion dollar investment in green, union jobs.

4. Tell Congress to Pass the Clean Water Protection Act: The Clean Water Protection Act would prevent future administrations from gutting the Clean Water Act through executive action, and it would permanently protect clean drinking water for many of our nation's cities. Obama should tell Congress to pass the Clean Water Protection Act and deliver it to his desk for his signature within the first 100 days.

Digg!

Tagged as: coal, coal mining, mtr

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


Marine Reservist Chases, Assaults Greek Orthodox Priest Whom He Mistook for an Arab Terrorist
Jasen D. Bruce hit the priest in the head with a tire iron, then chased him three blocks.
Post by Faiz Shakir. November 11, 2009.
Idaho Republican Blake Hall Fired for Throwing Used Condoms on the Lawn of a Woman He Was Stalking
"It's unimaginable that a 56-year-old would be so deviant."
Post by Steven D.. November 10, 2009.
Fox Mogul Rupert Murdoch Echoes Glenn Beck, Calls Obama a Racist
So much for the supposed "truce" between Fox and the White House.
Post by Steve Benen. November 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Those coal companies are putting URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, etc. into the water, in case you wondered why your drinking water is black.
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 3, 2008 9:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coal is mostly carbon, but the complete list of impurities in coal includes every
element in the periodic table. The major impurities are, depending on where
you found it: URANIUM, ARSENIC, LEAD, MERCURY, Antimony, Cobalt,
Nickel, Copper, Selenium, Barium, Fluorine, Silver, Beryllium, Iron, Sulfur,
Boron, Titanium, Cadmium, Magnesium, Calcium, Manganese, Vanadium,
Chlorine, Aluminum, Chromium, Molybdenum and Zinc. Coal smoke and
cinders are commercially viable ORE for the above elements. Chinese industrial
grade coal contains much more arsenic than American coal. Chinese industrial
grade coal is sometimes stolen by peasants for cooking. The result is that the
whole family dies of arsenic poisoning. Coal varies a lot. You have to analyze
it not only mine by mine but even lump by lump. Coal is a rock. It comes out
of the ground. What would you expect of a rock? Coal also contains organics.
When they dump overburden, it inevitably contains "stony coal," by which I mean
a combination of ordinary rock and coal.
Reference:
OUR NUCLEAR FUTURE:
THE PATH OF SELECTIVE IGNORANCE
by Alex Gabbard
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, TN
Selections from the 19th Annual Conference
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
March 14,15,16, 1996
Nashville, Tennessee

Published by the
SOUTHERN FUTURE SOCIETY
1996
Edited by Jack D. Arters, Ed.D.
Conference Director
The truth is, all natural rocks contain most natural elements. Coal is a rock.
The average concentration of uranium in coal is 1 or 2 parts per million. Illinois
coal contains up to 103 parts per million uranium. A 1000 million watt coal
fired power plant burns 4 million tons of coal each year. If you multiply 4
million tons by 1 part per million, you get 4 tons of uranium. Most of that is
U238. About .7% is U235. 4 tons = 8000 pounds. 8000 pounds times .7% =
56 pounds of U235. An average 1000 million watt coal fired power plant puts
out 56 to 112 pounds of U235 every year. There are only 2 places the uranium
can go: Up the stack or into the cinders.
Since a reactor full fuel load is around 11 tons of 2% U235 and 98% U238, and
one load lasts about 10 years, and what one coal fired power plant puts into the
air and cinders fully fuels a nuclear power plant.
Compare 4 Million tons per year with 1.1 tons per year. 1.1 divided by 4 Million
= 2.75 E -7 = .000000275 =.0000275%. Remember that only 2% of that is
U235. The nuclear power plant needs ~44 pounds of U235 per year. The coal
fired power plant burns coal by the trainload. The nuclear power plant consumes
U235 in such small quantities yearly that you could carry that much weight in a
briefcase. The full fuel load and the years between fueling varies from reactor to
reactor, but one truck can carry the weight of a full nuclear fuel load.
See also: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Review
and
ORNLReview2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go to the Ilovemountains.org site
Posted by: jbro434 on Dec 3, 2008 11:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to the site and send the letter to Obama about his promise to address mountain top removal. It is quick and easy. This is a despicable practice. You do not have to live in Appalachia to be concerned about this issue.
ilovemountains.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another nice piece of news
Posted by: Harris20 on Dec 4, 2008 12:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Year after year we've heard what a president or what a Congress has done but there's not much "the people" can do about it because we are controlled by a one-party system in America. Dialogue is nice but that's about all forums like AlterNet provide. The system let's us bitch all we want to provide the illusion this is a free country. What Bush is doing with his midnight regulations will continue in another way in another form under the Obama adminsitration. There is no such thing as a free country, as soon as we realize this we can think about the next step.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another nice piece of news Posted by: berger788
» Right on, man. Posted by: ATH
Should NOT be Surprised
Posted by: JSquercia on Dec 4, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People should NOT be surprised that the EPA is ignoring its own rules THAT is what the Administration has done SINCE Day One . They appoint people to head these agencies whose whole Philosphy is OPPOSED to the Agency's Mission .
I know that it is NOT Christian to HATE these people afterall we are supposed to LOVE our enimees but I can't HELP it : I hate these SOB's and only wish that they had to live with the consequences of their Rulings . Make them live Downstream and suffer the toxic drinking water that they have no problem foisting off on those who they obviously believe are INFERIOR to themselves .
Dear God PLEASE save us from any OTHER Bush's
EVER holding ANY office EVEN that of Dog catcher . I say this as we read of Jeb wanting to become a Senator from Florida. HEAVEN HELP US

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Sad
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Dec 5, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cheney is the dictator.
The other one is the handpuppet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush isn't just stupid.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 5, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By his disengagement in affairs of government, we may assume that abominations, such as his latest assault on environmental stability, happen because he is stupid; but I now believe in a more sinister motivation: that Bush, dumb as he is, believes that he and his aristocratic-leaning rich friends are superior to everyone else, and that he goes out of his way to continually prove it by hammering the less advantaged at every opportunity. It is not ignorant ineptitude that explains his bizarre, destructive behavior, but rather, active, deliberate disdain for anyone not in his exclusive club. That he keeps having to prove his "superiority," even at this late date in his presidency, also proves that he is, at his core, a coward, much like the schoolyard bully who must endlessly pick on the weak to make himself feel good, but who folds like a cheap tent when someone finally confronts him.

The problem for all of us in the last eight years has been that nobody would confront Bush. I seriously wonder how many people in our congress and the judicial branch have been directly threatened to lay low and keep their mouths shut by operatives in Bush's administration; my guess is that the number is far greater than anyone realizes. Maybe that's also why few in our government, including Barak Obama, are talking about prosecuting Bush and his cabal, the most lawless and heinous administration in our history.

It will be good riddance to this mean, stupid, dictatorial bully of a faux president; but, after he's gone, many of his operatives will remain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush isn't just stupid. Posted by: ratcat
How one man...
Posted by: buffeliscious on Dec 5, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with the capacity to do so much good, can instead do so much wrong and bad, is almost beyond my capacity to understand. And we should be careful, as he's already trying to rewrite history, saying that having to go to war with Iraq was a "big surprise" to him, and other such things. Don't let him. He needs to go down in history as the nefarious despot that he is.

And here is more proof... one last ditch effort to leave office into the gracious hands of his super-polluting corporate buddies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Not the President
Posted by: ATH on Dec 5, 2008 1:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I agree Bush is a new low, we need to realize and remember that Congress--a Democrat- controlled Congress, since 2006, has done nothing to stop Bush and has appointed him these dictatorial powers, and only a few like Dennis Kucinich have stood up.
It's the system we have in place; the faces change, but the game is basically the same since corporations have basically taken control, and merged with government power through the medium of money and politics..this is the exact definition Mussolini gave for "Fascism" when he said "fascism should more appropriately be called 'corporatism.'

"Meet the new boss...same as the old boss"

And we must vow to never be fooled again. If we want change, we're going to have to bring it. It's either us, or it isn't going to happen. These entrenched poers are not just going to give up their plush existences, because they are souless, decadent, heartless, un-trustworthy, and insane in their greed, and lost from any true communion with life, and nature, and what some call God.

If we wish America again to be a Democratic
Republic, as it was intended by our Founding Fathers, and the Constitution to be the Supreme Law of the Land, a Constitution that was meant to CHECK and balance the Federal Government, with any powers not given directly to them reserved to the States and people, then it's we that must restore this Republic.
We haven't had Constitutional rule for a long time; really, it died with the creation of the Federal Reserve, when we turned a free industrial nation over to a private banking cartel, in bed with government because of its greed, and ever need for cash; the result has been the robbing of the middle and lower classes through the hidden tax that is inflation, and inflation is caused by the printing of our fiat, or unbacked money, at a rate not in balance with the production of goods and services, because, asides from bombs, our # 1 export (asides from jobs) is weapons.Other than weapons manufacture, we no longer have an industrial base in this country .

Since the inception of the FED, it has de-valued our dollar by over 90%.
But if it was backed, the government couldn't keep spending and spending on wars without raising taxes, unless one had all the gold, but that has been robbed by these bankers!

Until we retake the power to print our own money, debt-free, and for solely the purpose of trade, and backed by silver (gold is too easily a cornered market)we are soon looking at insolency, the destruction of our currency, and continued domination by the rich. Politics will continue to revolve around money, and the system will remain corrupted. This is one of the crucial steps we must first take.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Entrenched Powers
Posted by: ATH on Dec 5, 2008 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"entrenched powers"...sorry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Get Me Wrong
Posted by: ATH on Dec 5, 2008 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get me wrong, though, people. I firmly believe Bush and many in his administration are as close to being "evil" as a person may be. I personally believe he and Cheney should have faced impeachment hearings.

Unfortunately, Nanacy Pelosi was briefed on the whole "Top-down Torture Agenda," along with other high-ranking democrats, and didn't do anything to stop it, and may have encouraged it. She ran on a promise to hold him accountable, but I'm sure he told her--or Cheney did--that they would bring her down with them..if not legally, definitely politically...which is all impeachment really is...

Truly, they deserve to be taken and tried in International Court, at the Hague in the Netherlands, where we have prosecuted Chinese for the very same torture techniques we've used: water-boarding. We also prosecuted the Germans for the same thing we did with Iraq--unprovoked pre-emptive, aggressive strike, as well as human rights violations.

By the way, water-boarding is NOT simulated drowning. To "simulate" is to "pretend..imitate..or counterfeit," according to some of the definitions in my Oxford Dictionary. There is nothing pretend about it! It is drowning, period! Controlled drowning, not "simulated!" George Carlin was right. The softer the euphemism, the worse the offense.

But the U.S. does not--listen to me--does not--torture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

POLLUTED STREAMS in SUBURBIA
Posted by: fg on Dec 6, 2008 11:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a newspaper report, from more than 20 years ago!, on the state of waterways in upscale Westfield, NJ, in the suburbs of New York City.

http://webzoom.freewebs.com/fjgajewski/ contaminationbrook.pdf

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]