Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The $70-an-Hour Autoworker Myth: A Zombie That Just Won't Die?

Posted by Art Levine, Huffington Post at 8:52 AM on December 2, 2008.


The $70-an-hour autoworker lie is alive and well, roaming the media landscape.
zombiesdrawing

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Like a zombie that can't be killed, the $70-an-hour autoworker lie is alive and well, roaming the media landscape -- and still being peddled by The New York Times in Monday's edition.

As Media Matters and other critics reported last week, it's a conservative myth concocted by totaling all wages, plus health and benefit costs to current workers and 450,000 retirees and their families -- and then deceptively dividing that huge total payout by the number of current UAW workers, about 140,000 in Detroit.

Here's what the Times said today in an article about the autoworkers considering concessions:

Some critics have taken aim at the automakers' hourly labor costs, which average more than $70 for senior workers, including wages and the value of benefits like pensions and health care.

Those costs run closer to $46 an hour at nonunion plants like Toyota's factory in Georgetown, Ky., and are even less at newer plants farther South, where foreign automakers have pegged wages closer to local rates.

In fact, as I and others previously reported, The Big Three true labor costs are on the way to matching those offered by non-union Japanese plants in the U.S.

It bears repeating what Media Matters' Eric Boehlert said on the political uses of this myth:

As Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) pointed out during congressional hearings last week, "There is apparently a cultural condition that's more ready to accept aid to a white-collar industry than the blue-collar industry, and that has to be confronted."

That cultural condition seems to extend to, and be embraced by, today's white-collar press corps.

Make no mistake: The $70-an-hour claim represents a classic case of conservative misinformation. It's also a very dangerous one. The falsehood about autoworkers is being spread at a crucial time, when a make-or-break public debate is taking place, a debate that could affect millions of American workers.

What will it take for the mainstream media to accurately report on the actual labor costs in Detroit while Congress is considering whether to give the Big Three a bailout?


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
question
Posted by: efrainstacy on Dec 2, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can someone with first-hand knowledge please post a typical hourly wage (i.e. not the total labor cost, just the gross hourly rate) for a line worker? I've also heard some high numbers for this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: question Posted by: Symp
» RE: question Posted by: ohb0b
hourly wages for the suits?
Posted by: johnthetreehugger on Dec 2, 2008 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what are the hourly wages for the suits? the CEO's, the financial officers, the VP's of this and that and so on?

that should put things in perspective.

of course, this illustrates what screaming hypocrites the conservatives are. They all say this is America and people should have the opportunity to earn a good living.

Well, the autoworkers formed a union and won concessions from the bosses so that they could earn a good living. good for them. (and yes, concessions is the correct term, as the impartial logic of capitalism demands that owners/managers pay as little as possible for wages and resources in order to maximize Mammon/God, i mean, um, Profits.)

anybody who thinks 40 or 70 bucks an hour is too much money for doing repetitive, factory line work, is a lazy paper shuffling asshole who probably has never done any real work in their life. by real work i am refering to making stuff - building, digging, DOING, - not sitting at a desk pushing papers around.

the unions and their pensions should be left alone. The bosses and shareholders need to bite the bullet on this one.

Executive management, Boards of Directors and Shareholders of all these big auto, big bank, big oil, big box stores, big computer, big whatever companies should be made to pay for the wreckage they have wrought for fostering wasteful spending, wasteful manufacturing, pollution, planned obsolescence, overconsumption, and a host of other ills on our society.

it is certainly not the workers fault for poor decision making and poor ideological pathways made and followed by the business classes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hourly wages for the suits? Posted by: OldRedleg
59% was General Motors market share in 1959. As General Motors
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Dec 3, 2008 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cheapened their product they lost market share. They earned every lost percentage point. They did it with perceived unreliability. They just out stupided themselves. In 1959 the import market was 1.5%. That means that Detroit held 98.5% of their home market.

Their 75 dollars an hour is just another lie out of the executive suite. They get that number by dividing the cost of "used to be" employees by the number of "now" employees. They used to have lots of employees. They don't any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]