Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Franken-Coleman Update: This Is Not Florida in 2000

Posted by Phoenix Woman, Firedoglake at 4:51 AM on December 2, 2008.


This will take a while, but that's how recounts go.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

As we watch the recount process unfold in Minnesota, bear this in mind: The persons screaming the loudest about "chaos" (which is apparently what would happen if all the votes were honestly counted, to judge from their squawking), and how icky everything about the recount supposedly is, and comparing the Minnesota recount to that of Florida in 2000, are the ones with the most invested in delegitimizing the results.

Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has sussed this out from the get-go, noting both Norm Coleman's frantically sleazy campaign and even more frantically sleazy post-campaign aren't exactly helping him here -- not when that notorious weathervane Tim Pawlenty had to tell him off in public for being a dorkwad.

What's been rather amusing lately is how the quasi-apocalyptic predictions of Steven Smith, a political-science professor from Washington University in St. Louis, have been elevated almost into Holy Writ because for some reason Minnesota Public Radio tapped him for instant analysis, rather than going with any of the local political observers. Smith decided to take this statement by Harry Reid -- that the Minnesota state canvassing board's refusal to admit that it does have the authority to rule is "a cause for great concern" -- and turn it into an alleged willingness to have the Senate decide who gets to sit in Paul Wellstone's seat come January. What it looks like to me is that this is more of an effort by Reid to back up Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie's trying to get the canvassing board to do its job.   In any event, several counties are still counting and a handful haven't even started yet.  This will take a while, but that's how recounts go.  

Digg!

Tagged as: minnesota, al franken, election '08, norm coleman, recount, senate race

Phoenix Woman is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another Miracle Election for Coleman?
Posted by: Magginkat on Dec 2, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Coleman should have never been in the senate. His S-election was the result of one of those miraculous "republican surges" that changed the outcome overnight. If I remember correctly Coleman was behind in the polls by somewhere between 5 & 10%. The morning after the "election" he had been the recepient of a "sudden republican surge" and had "won" by that same figure! A minimum of 10% change overnight.
Praise the Lord and all that good horse manure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pantpantpant *wheeeze*
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 2, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes--they're counting, the officials are wusses, Coleman is animated dogcrap, what else is new, but...

HOW IS FRANKEN DOING?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]