Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Republicans Just Can't Stop Picking Partisan Fights

Posted by Digby, Hullabaloo at 12:07 AM on December 1, 2008.


Just in case anyone thinks the spirit of bipartisanship has overtaken Congress in light of the severe financial crisis, think again.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Just in case anyone thinks the spirit of bipartisanship has overtaken the congress in light of the severe financial crisis, think again. From TPM:

Earlier this month, the Bush administration nominated Neil Barofsky, a federal prosecutor, to be the Treasury Department's special inspector general on the bailout program. That's a crucial post, given the astronomical sums at issue, the broad authority that Treasury has been given to distribute them, the concerns that have been raised about possible conflicts of interest, and the general urgency of our efforts to prevent an economic collapse.

So you'd think Congress would be doing everything it could to get Barofsky confirmed right away. You'd be wrong.

Last week, Sen. Chris Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who chairs the banking committee, issued a little-noticed statement saying that although the nomination "was cleared by members of the Senate Banking Committee, the leadership of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and all Democratic Senators," it was "blocked on the floor by at least one Republican member." (itals ours.)

Senate rules allow any senator to anonymously block a vote on confirmation to any federal post, for any reason.

The rationale for the move remains unclear. But a Washington Post story from a few days before Dodd's statement offers two suggestions. It notes that Barofsky supported Barack Obama, and describes an unresolved "battle between the Finance and Banking committees over which has jurisdiction over the confirmation process."

Of course, it may also be that they're doing the job they have been assigned -- delaying oversight.

Digg!

Tagged as: democrats, republicans, economy, washington post, economic crisis

Digby is the proprietor of Hullabaloo.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Opposition as Identity
Posted by: Lilly on Dec 1, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some people seem not to know who they are unless they are fighting somebody or something. Oppositionalism for its own sake enhances their sense of identity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Digby has titled the salient issue Posted by: godsbreath64
What did you expect?
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 1, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP always picks fights no matter how far to the "right" the Democrats go. I've been warning about this but where were you guys then? Oh that's right. You kept saying shit like "But if the Democrats don't pander to the right, they'll be perceived as too liberal and lose." Well? They moved all the way to the rightwing and yet the GOP is not gonna act any different so what do you expect? There will always be assholes out there who don't appreciate anything but that doesn't mean shooting your own base out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What did you expect? Posted by: violawall
» RE: What did you expect? Posted by: maxpayne
The Real Issue?
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Dec 1, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the real issue politics or is it religion? Don't forget. The GOP is filled to the very brim with those who love mythology far far far more than reality.

My guess is that the anonymous block has more to do with politicos being scared about Obama being a 'Muslim' than it does with something as mundane as politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Real Issue? Posted by: violawall
» RE: The Real Issue? Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: The Real Issue? Posted by: Bozwell
On purpose.
Posted by: Hovey on Dec 1, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First what a stupid rule, but I would want to know its origin before deciding it should be changed.

But something tells me stopping a watchdog for the bailout seems more on purpose than just a political ploy. Chances are there will never be an accounting of who the money went to and how much. The last great steal by the bandits of Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On purpose. Posted by: Lauren
So why do Democrats give the Repugs a free pass on most everything?
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Dec 1, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where is the opposition in this supposed 2-party system of ours???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NCLB = Kennedy Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» were is your proof? Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: were is your proof? Posted by: Quannah
The GOP being bipartisan is like sticking with the Wife whom cheats on you
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Dec 1, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With your Best Friends
repetitively
President Bush took the bullets on:
No Child Left Behind
Senior Drug Prescription plan
Just to name a few
Bush let the Dems do domestic policy and those same Dems have been doing the may dirty for years! What is Obama going to do find the GOP's token (R)INO's to say he is crossing the aisle? Thats another funny thing, when Chuck Hagel is doing this thing, no one complains however Joe Lieberman... oh how dare he!
Anyhoo this is just another hypocrisy moment in American Politics

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't be so quick to judge
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Dec 1, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't consider Dodd to be clean by a long shot. So any nominee that he supports is automatically suspect. Let's see how this unfolds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What did you expect 2
Posted by: badkitty on Dec 1, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the past 15 years the Republicans have consistently voted as a block. Over the past eight years, we have Iraq (excepting Chaffee), judicial appointments,and every bit of social legislation until very recently. I keep wondering where Obama expects to find bipartisanship on the Republican side. When push comes to shove, they will always oppose any type of progress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Wayne
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Dec 1, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The old Duke said it in one of his oaters: "only good indian is a dead indian." The longtime Orange County neocon got it wrong, he should have said: "ain't never been a Republican worth a shit and they killed the first one because he was kind to niggers." Nothing has changed and even our good Native American brothers can say Ugh on that one!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet writers are the pot calling the kettle black!
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Dec 1, 2008 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The previous story listed on the Alternet Home page is this;
"Uncovering the Final Secrets of the Bush Administration
Charles Homans, Washington Monthly
Rights and Liberties: Treat Cheney's offices like a crime scene, create a 9/12 Commission, and declassify the Bush papers -- the public deserves to know."

Now tell me progressives who is it that will not stop picking the partisan fights? Where is the investigation into the mortage deals of DODD? Where is the investigation of Barney Frank for telling the American people that Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac were stable? Where is the investagations into ACORN and thier part in this finacal mess of forcing banks to lend to minorities that did not quailfy for home loans?
Liberal politicians are scum sucking thiefs just like the conservitive ones so progressives get off your high horse and join the real people to clean up politics once and for all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon! This is a set-up!
Posted by: Quannah on Dec 1, 2008 6:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You already have some of the wing-nuts like Sean Hannity calling this economic mess "Obama's Recession!" (Nevermind that they announced today that the recession started December 2007!)

They will continually try to frame all the problems we're facing as DEMOCRATIC PARTY problems, and PRESIDENT OBAMA problems. So, if there isn't someone appointed to conduct oversight while Bush is still there, guess what? Obama gets to inherit the problem of -- you guessed it! -- NO OVERSIGHT!

This is the same old Republic Party politics as usual.

I wait for the day when they will at least try to employ some new tactics. At least it will open the possibilities for a surprise now and then!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: C'mon! This is a set-up! Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
» RE: C'mon! This is a set-up! Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
Early stages of disintagration.
Posted by: yale on Dec 1, 2008 7:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The repugs are picking fights because its all they have left. Think about it, in one day, "election day", they lost the little bit of a voice they had. Nobody is paying any attention to any of them now, and like a bunch of two year olds, here come the temper tantrums. The childish acts of Bush, McCain, Palin, and the downright evil acts of Cheney, and Rumsfeld have cost the party its life. They are in very deep doo doo, and they all know it. Falling apart at the seams is an accurate description. Watch out for the new independant party that will emerge from the ashes of the old Republican party. The word, Republican will be tainted for at least a few presidental elections to come, and it may take that long to undo the heaps of damage they have done to the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why can't
Posted by: JSquercia on Dec 3, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why can't Dodd name the Republicans who are bocking this ? It is amazing how the party that demonized the dems for Obtructionism have no problem engaging in it themselves .
On that note I was sorry to see Saxby Chambliss win thus preventing a Fillabuster Proof Senate . I am somewhat hopeful that the two Republican Senators from Maine can be persuased to vote their moderate convivtions .
Still Chambliss is an oozing bag of Puss who has shown himself to be a des[icable person in attacking the patriotism of Max Cleland who lost 3 limbs in defense of his country . He accused him of supporting Terrorists because he opposed the Administration's not honoring the civil service status and union representation of the Department . A department whose creation was opposed initially by Bush

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]