Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Here are Some Sickening Figures to Help Put the Bailout in Perspective

Posted by Staff, AlterNet at 5:17 AM on November 26, 2008.


Barry Ritholtz puts the current bailout figures in a historical perspective ... and it ain't pretty folks.
burningmoney

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Barry Ritholtz puts the bailout figure into proper historical perspective, and it ain't pretty folks:

If we add in the Citi bailout, the total cost now exceeds $4.6165 trillion dollars. People have a hard time conceptualizing very large numbers, so let’s give this some context. The current Credit Crisis bailout is now the largest outlay In American history.

Jim Bianco of Bianco Research crunched the inflation adjusted numbers. The bailout has cost more than all of these big budget government expenditures –- combined:

Marshall Plan: Cost: $12.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $115.3 billion
Louisiana Purchase: Cost: $15 million, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $217 billion
Race to the Moon: Cost: $36.4 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $237 billion
S&L Crisis: Cost: $153 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $256 billion
Korean War: Cost: $54 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $454 billion
The New Deal: Cost: $32 billion (Est), Inflation Adjusted Cost: $500 billion (Est)
Invasion of Iraq: Cost: $551b, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $597 billion
Vietnam War: Cost: $111 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $698 billion
NASA: Cost: $416.7 billion, Inflation Adjusted Cost: $851.2 billion

TOTAL: $3.92 trillion

______________________________________________________________________

data courtesy of Bianco Research

You can read Ritholtz's whole post here. But we have to warn you, there really isn't an upside.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hank and Benny
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Nov 25, 2008 8:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are laughing at us, all the way to the bank.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the band played on.
Posted by: thekidde on Nov 26, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least until the Titanic slipped beneath the waves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's another interesting fact.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Nov 26, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One set of figures that stood out in the comparison of expenditures is the relative costs of the Iraq occupation and Vietnam war. After only five years in Iraq, the US has already spent 86% of the total cost of the Vietnam war, which lasted over twice as long.

Apparently, the Iraq occupation is not very cost-efficient and we desperately need the money being frittered away over there, so it is time to shut it down.

But, we can't. War is big business, and many big businesses in the defense industry would be hurt, again worsening our economic situation. We have constructed an economy based on war and destruction (by the way, the rampant consumerism and massive trash heaps of our "throw away culture" is just another form of destruction; of our environment and its raw materials), and are now suffering the effects of its "blow-back." We have woven a web around ourselves but are only now discovering that we have become the prey.

"Beating swords into plowshares" has never been an interesting endeavor for the US, but we'd better learn how: ours is the Sword of Damocles, and it is falling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here's another interesting fact. Posted by: pelican beak
» oops. Correction to my entry above Posted by: pelican beak
Your call this historical perspective?
Posted by: jdub on Nov 26, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting, to be sure, but this is hardly putting things in historical perspective. You mix apples and oranges, and draw a glittering conclusion from little evidence. Sounds like grade school to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting
Posted by: bookie on Nov 26, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Citi bought out my mortgage two years ago. Today they sent me a notice in the mail that they are lowering my interest rate. Good for me, but I have to wonder if my rate went down because of the bailout. With Citi so flush with money now maybe they are going to try and undercut other lenders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]