Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Should Not Ignore Immigration Policy While Focusing on the Economy

Posted by Cristina Jimenez, DMI Blog at 10:09 AM on November 25, 2008.


Immigrant entrepreneurs are an essential source of job creation.
statueofliberty

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Despite the strong and decisive support from the immigrant electorate, many say immigration reform won't be in the agenda during the first year of the Obama administration. The economy is everyone's priority.

But some recent entrepreneurship reports indicate that the new administration should not ignore immigration policy when trying to help the economy.

A new study for the Small Business Administration by Rob Fairlie of UC Santa Cruz found that immigrants are nearly 30 percent more likely to start a business than non-immigrants, and they represent 16.7 percent of all new business owners in the United States. Nearly 30 percent of all new business owners per month in New York, Florida, and Texas, are immigrants.

The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report reveals that immigrant entrepreneurs are an essential source of job creation. The report found that minority-owned startups create more jobs than startups by white Americans, because the latter tend to be one-person firms.

According to the Center for an Urban Future, immigrant entrepreneurs have emerged as key engines of economic growth in our cities. In New York City, for example, the borough of Queens--known to be a magnet for immigrants, has become a leading source of job creation.

When discussing the potential of immigrant entrepreneurs as an engine for economic growth in our troubled economy, Vivek Wadhwa, a fellow at Harvard and Business Week columnists, said that immigration reform is essential for this immigrant entrepreneurial spirit to continue and expand. The solution, he said, is not to increase the number of working visas, "we need more green cards."

These findings clearly show, as U.S. News reports, that when figuring out a way to stimulate our economy, "smoothing out our complicated immigration system is a stimulus policy in itself."

Digg!

Tagged as: immigration, economy, jobs, job creation, immigrant entrepreneurs

Cristina is an Immigration Policy intern at the Drum Major Institute for Public Policy.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
immigration reform means NAFTA reform
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 25, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Step one should be a ban on dumping subsidized corn in Mexico at below-market prices - that will allow Mexico's domestic, small-farmer based agricultural system to expand, and will lower the pool of economic refugees looking for low-wage agriculture, construction and meatpacking jobs in the U.S.

Step two should be a rethinking of the outsourcing of U.S. manufacturing to Mexico under NAFTA - workers there earn 10-20 dollars a day, a small fraction of what employees would have to pay in the U.S.

This means that wages fall in the U.S., and wealth concentrates in fewer and fewer hands. That tends to result in drunken gambling and speculative bubbles on Wall Street, which is what happened - vast amounts of oil money were invested in bad loans, and now the taxpayer is being forced to bail out the gamblers.

Where did the NAFTA issue go? It was such a large part of the Clinton-Obama primary race, wasn't it? Obama even promised to call the president of Mexico and push for renegotiation, didn't he?

www.washingtonpost.com/ august 2007

Barack Obama: "I would immediately call the president of Mexico, the president [sic] of Canada to try to amend NAFTA, because I think we can get labor agreements in that agreement right now."

Joe Biden: "Hey, look, a president's job is to create jobs, not to export jobs, and the idea that we are not willing to take the prime minister of Canada and the president of Mexico to the mat to make this agreement work is just a lack of presidential leadership."

In contrast...
"The bar for applause lines was set high early in the proceedings when Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio, the longest of long shots, said that "it's time to get out of NAFTA and the WTO," referring to the free-trade agreement with Mexico and Canada and the World Trade Organization.

Scrap the agreements entirely? Inconceivable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The elephant in the room
Posted by: improperly_sedated on Nov 26, 2008 12:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People get worked up over the momentary rate of immigration, the demographic balance, excessive population, and the replacement of our culture with those of the newcomers. But the real problem is economic. The real problem is systemic.

We have a system, and that system works in certain predictable ways. Our system is dependent upon a continuous influx of immigrants (also known as "suckers," and "fresh meat.") Any four year old should be able to tell you that this arrangement is unsustainable, but four year olds have yet to be indoctrinated into the dogma of perpetual growth.

With a downwardly mobile working class (the so called middle class is not a class at all, just an income tax bracket -- when it shrinks, that just means the working class is getting poorer) we have more and more underpaid, overqualified people. More people unwilling to work harder for less.

That's where the immigrants come in. Most of them come from countries that are, so far, much poorer than this one. Poor enough that down looks like up to them, and they bust ass most obligingly. Until they've been here for a generation or two and their children come to realize that they're being screwed. Then it's time to bring in the next boatload.

The US economy peaked around 1970. The US now has its highest percentage immigrant population ever. These are not unrelated.

Additionally, we are now also dependent upon massive immigration to fill the ranks of our educated classes. It seems our schools are downwardly mobile as well.

(Being in my forties and back in school, I can attest to this last point. Much of the required college curriculum of today is stuff I had to learn in high school back in the day, and a minority of my professors are native born.)

Sorry if I ramble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legal and Illegal Immigration
Posted by: zak822 on Nov 26, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much of the debate has been marred by the conflation of legal and illegal immigration.

There is little real opposition to legal immigration. There is a lot of opposition to illegal immigration and in a tight economy that opposition will be ramped up.

And it will come from people like me, reasonable, ordinary folks. Not racists, not nativists but people who are rightly worried about an endless inflow of cheap labor that is displacing legal workers.

I'm 60 years old, African-American and I have seen the hospitality industry change greatly.

Kudos to legal immigrants who start businesses. We can use more of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]