Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama's Economic Team: Reactions Roundup

Posted by Staff, Huffington Post at 1:42 PM on November 24, 2008.


Barack Obama officially announced the key players in his economic team. Some reactions are excited, others doubtful.
seconlarge

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

President-elect Barack Obama officially announced the key players in his economic team just this morning, but already economics and politics sites have reacted to the news.

The Economist has praised Obama's pick of Tim Geithner for Treasury Secretary saying, "...ah glorious, glorious competence. How we've missed you.":

...Mr Geithner brings two crucial qualities. First, he represents continuity. From the first days of the crisis last year, he has worked hand in glove with Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, and Mr Paulson. He can continue to do so while awaiting confirmation. If Citigroup, for example, needs federal help, Mr Geithner will be involved. An unknown when he joined the New York Fed in 2003, he is now a familiar face to the most senior executives on Wall Street and to central bankers and finance ministers overseas.

Second, he represents competence. He has spent more time on financial crises, from Mexico and Thailand to Brazil and Argentina, than probably any other policymaker in office today. Mr Geithner understands better than almost anyone that in crises you throw out the forecast and focus on avoiding low probability events with catastrophic consequences. Such judgments are excruciating: do too little, and you undermine confidence and generate a bigger crisis that needs even bigger policy action. Do too much, and you look panicked and invite blowback from Wall Street, Congress and the press. At times during the crisis Mr Geithner would counsel Mr Bernanke on the importance of the right "ratio of drama to effectiveness".

Former Clinton Secretary of Labor and current go-to wonk commentator Robert Reich praised the group's competence as well:

All are pragmatists. Some media have dubbed them "centrists" or "center-right," but in truth they're remarkably free of ideological preconception. All have well-earned reputations as hard workers, well-versed in the technical details of public and private finance. They are not visible veterans of the old battles over supply-side economics or deficit reduction, nor are they well-known to the public. They are not visionaries but we don't need visionaries when the economic perils are clear and immediate. We need competence. Obama could not appoint a more competent group.

Despite the "socialist" smears that pervaded the end of the campaign, Political Punch has a statement from the pro-business US Chamber of Commerce president praising Obama's picks

US Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue issued the following statement on the announcement of President-elect Barack Obama's economic team: "President-elect Obama has chosen a strong, experienced economic team. Restoring the nation's economic health must be our top priority and the Chamber stands ready to work with the new administration to spur growth and job creation. This team brings a wealth of knowledge to Washington and an understanding that any sustainable economic recovery will involve the business sector."

"Tim Geithner has a deep understanding of our capital markets and the experience and credibility to tackle our nation's biggest challenge -- restoring our economy and rebuilding our financial markets. He has been directly engaged in all the steps taken so far to address this unprecedented crisis and is well qualified to lead the Treasury Department. Larry Summers' knowledge of economic issues and past experience as Treasury secretary will serve President Obama well. Likewise, Christina Romer and Melody Barnes will bring an understanding that any sustainable economic recovery will involve the business sector."

The American Prospect's Erza Klein praised Obama's selection of Peter Orszag for head of OMB:

If you're interested in health care reform, the appointment of Peter Orszag to be director of the Office of Management and Budget is second only in importance to the the elevation of Tom Daschle to health czar and HHS secretary.

OMB is a strange place. It's incredibly important, but also somewhat amorphous. It's a cabinet level agency that offers policy recommendations to the president, scores programs, builds the yearly budget. It is how the executive branch imposes empirical rigor on its agencies, and coheres their work into a single budget. In that way, it is the connective tissue of the federal bureaucracy. And the director sits atop all that, sets many of the agency's priorities, and is, generally, one of the president's top policy advisers.

Open Left, however, had a critique of the picks:

Really? Obama is going with someone who is currently executing the bailout? While Geithner isn't Larry Summers, that still strikes me as less than change-y. Policy by Dow people seem to like it, but such metrics have proven their worthlessness in the recent past, as the stock market continues to tumble several weeks after the Wall Street bailout was signed into law.


Blago: It Just Keeps Getting Stranger
Have you noticed that Blagojevich appears to be stark raving mad?
Post by Steve Benen. January 9, 2009.
Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ivy League all stars team from the "privilege" coast/ Would Honest Liberals really like this?
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Nov 24, 2008 2:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could Obama really be Reagan
keep taxes low
or just keep the Bush tax cuts
Iraq War, well there is no reason to end a war that you can get credit for winning (you know damm well the NY Times will try and do it).
The new Fed Chairman I heard is just another Wall Street dude from the Paulson school of Bailouts so maybe this will be a half good?
Why is Obama really sounding like the Bush 3rd term with the hope of UHC (different subject).
The "Rich" still keeps there tax cuts however capital gains, would that get cut?
Irony all of most of this stuff might work w/o the massive tax increases. What do you people think "infrastructure projects" really mean? Chicago and other cities like it will look GREAT in the next four, however the suburbs might get a new rapid rail line however get in the back of the line if you want some cash. Most of this I dont really know however I have a feeling a Conservative like myself and most of you Liberals will be seeing eye to eye on a lot of issues (i.e. the bailout) in these next four years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good But Not Fresh
Posted by: radical53 on Nov 24, 2008 3:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's team seems competent but I see too much looking to the past for answers. Summers may be a great economic mind, but he has participated in some failed policies in the past and is reported to be somewhat overbearing in style.

Ms. Romer's specialty is reportedly the policies that were considered and adoped to deal with the Great Depression.

I don't see a major issue with Geithner.

Melody Barnes is a fresh face with progressive ideas. She also has experience working on Capitol Hill. I don't know if her main impact will be on economic policy.

I would really have preferred to see Laura Tyson in Summers' place. I'm sure there are other good choices I have never heard of. Summers worries me a little.

I think it's clear, however, that Obama is going to be very involved personally and that gives me a great deal of comfort.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Change we can believe in, Obamas is taking the right road centrist, no tax increases until 2011
Posted by: Social liberal on Nov 24, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obamas choices are so far excellent:

Will not repel the tax cuts, will only let them expire. Anybody be they Keynesian or supply- sider understands the monumental stupidity of raising taxes during a recession/depression. Has promised to cut taxes. He almost sounds like Reagan. He is also fully aware of the election 2010, he does not want to give the Republicans the weapon they dearly desire, "Obama the tax raiser", "wealth-spreader". He also wants to be reelected in 2012 and you cannot be reelected if you raise taxes, the US is still a center-right country. The voters mistrust government and do not want to part more than they have to. they are all to aware of the massive misuse of tax dollars that the House Democrats as well as the recent Georg W. Bush spending excesses.

Rahm Emanuel, hard core right Democrat, that abhors the far left of teh Democratic party

Hillary Clinton, a Hawkish Democrat, and she is out of the way when it comes to making a centrist solution to the health care issue. Health care for all but not socialized medicine, single payer.


Geithner as treasury secretary signals that Obama understands the needs of small business owners and the capital markets, reaffirms that Obama is a free marketeer. Summers as chief economic adviser does the same.

This is change we can believe in, a smarter and slimmer government, lower taxes with health care for all without socialism. Reforms but in moderation and at a slow pace. I am getting to like Obama more and more, I was afraid he was a Trojan horse for the far left, instead he was a Trojan horse for classic liberalism, a civil libertarian and a fiscal responsible liberal. I have waited for that for so long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fiscal Responsibility? Posted by: Pissed Off Woman
Umm... not as advertised.
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Nov 24, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Summers, Romer, and Geithner.

This is the modern version of Greenspan, no doubt about it. No change from the Clinton era, no change from the Bush Sr. era. The status quo minus the neocons - that's what we've seen so far. Check out Romer getting giddy over Bernanke's appointment:

Bernanke taught at Princeton University from 1985 through 2002, then served almost three years on the Fed's Board of Governors. He became chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers in June.

"From an economist's view, this is the most exciting thing that has happened. He got it on merit. It's not who he knew," says Christina Romer, an economist at UC Berkeley who, with her husband David Romer, wrote a paper on what makes a good Fed chief.

The Romers, both Democrats, say Bernanke is the best Republican Bush could have chosen.

Although he is not outwardly political, Bernanke is cut from the same free-market, small-government cloth as Greenspan, the Romers say.


These are corporate free-market idealogues - dead-set enemies of everything FDR championed. Looks like "hope and change" was not much more than a nice campaign slogan... and still no word on anything related to energy and the environment.

Well, not really surprised, are we? Obama was a big backer of the bailout, raised in Harvard, devotee of the Chicago school of economics, as events have shown. This is historically in line. Presidents campaign on populist messages while serving corporate masters - that's been the story ever since Truman, and here we are again.

How does a $700 billion bailout for rotten bankers fit in with the "small government free-market model", again? Summers is such a bad choice on so many grounds...

"To a large extent, environmental problems are the consequence of policies that are misguided on narrow economic grounds," said Lawrence H. Summers, chief economist of the World Bank.

Oh, were to begin? With Summer's laudatory view of the World Bank?. The guy is pure neoliberal - backer of the Chad-Cameroon pipeline, etc. It's a clear signal that the new policies will be based on corporate neoliberalism and IMF/World Bank approaches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is boxed in to old ideas ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Nov 24, 2008 4:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the possible exception of Romer the players are all beholden to the very institutions that got us into this mess, the Wall Street Banks.

We are already seeing the game plan unfold, save Wall Street to Hell with Main Street. The vast majority of Obama's picks will be pushing this plan. Obama risks his whole first term with dismal economic performance if he does not break from old ideas that will not get the job done but favor Wall Street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rose Colored FASCIST BS
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Nov 24, 2008 6:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huffington Post's "staff" is clearly not to be trusted and no better than corporate monopoly MSM.

These beltway DC players are (at best) hack Fascist poison. They all have an apparatchik track record of defending and promoting the usual Wall Street overclass that pumped and dumped this latest extortion trap on a gullible nation and the world at large.

This has always been about what George Carlin called "the Owners" and their Organized Corporate Crime Rule

The Economist and Huffington touted "Mr Geithner" is straight out of the New York "Federal Reserve" Corp (NOT federal and NO reserves) branch private bank Ponzi scheme that rigs and cooks the economy for the ruling class worldwide.

As in most Big Oil dictatorships, Obama is not much more than a smarmy puppet entertainer pretending to be in charge. His abysmal voting record, CFR handlers and corrupt choices prove this beyond doubt whatever.

This imposter does not fool thinking African-Americans or anyone else...


"It is absurd to claim that a progressive "movement" with a potential for profound social change can coalesce behind a candidate who repeatedly and reflexively aligns with the worst corporate malefactors on the planet, the very same individuals who brought about the current catastrophe."
Glen Ford (executive editor Black Agenda Report for the journal of African American political thought and action. October 15, 2008)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ose Colored FASCIST BS Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: ose Colored FASCIST BS Posted by: herronsmith
"Left out", christopher Hayes The Nation
Posted by: Social liberal on Nov 24, 2008 7:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it very amusing to watch a young guy like like Hayes, who came of age during the George W. Bush presidency, discover that:

* Obama will not simply ascend to the presidency

* pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan

* close Guantanamo

*disassemble the NSA spying program

*create a Department of Peace, headed by Ramsey Clark.

There is a reason that Obama's first term is starting to look like a third term for Bill Clinton. Obama wants to be reelected, Clinton was the ultimate ReaganDemocat, why change a winning team.
______________________________________-

"Left out", Christopher Hayes, The Nation

" Chris Bowers from OpenLeft blog: "It seems to me as though there is a team of rivals, except for the left, which is left off the team entirely."

"Not a single, solitary, actual dyed-in-the-wool progressive has, as far as I can tell, even been mentioned for a position in the new administration. Not one. Remember this is the movement that was right about Iraq, right about wage stagnation and inequality, right about financial deregulation, right about global warming and right about health care. And I don't just mean in that in a sectarian way. I mean to say that the emerging establishment consensus on all of these issues came from the left. There's tons of things the left is right about that aren't even close to mainstream (taking a hatchet to the national security state and ending the prison industrial complex to name just two), but hopefully we're moving there."

And yet, no one who comes from the part of American political and intellectual life that has given birth to all of these ideas is anywhere to be found within miles of the Obama cabinet thus far. WTF?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama, up against the wall of anger
Posted by: amacd on Nov 24, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Obama administration may not be able to triangulate away the rising popular anger against this looting of our economy.

The following video rant by (the hardly leftist) Dylan Ratigan on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” this morning confronting Obama economic adviser, Austan Goolsbee, reminded me of the outburst of Howard Beale in the film "Network", or of Warren Beatty’s "Bulworth".

Dylan is absolutely correct ---- we (the people) are all becoming very angered with the issues of fairness, RESTITUTION, and renewal of 'our' economy!:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27888374#27888374


While Dylan's rant is highly emotive, starting 1/3 into the video, he does bring up the key point that this looting was only 'not illegal', because the crooks actually changed the laws by bribing Congress and the last two administrations to make their looting a perfectly legal 'smash and grab'.

Nobel economics laureate, George Ackerlof, certainly had it right in 2001 when he tagged the Bush administration economic policies as, "not normal government policy, but a form of looting".

It’s looking like the Bush era corporate financial Empire's looting is something that the experienced Wall Street people of the Obama administration may erroneously feel too
cautious about tearing down and replacing with a socially responsible and honest investment industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

active link to video
Posted by: amacd on Nov 24, 2008 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/27888374#27888374

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

americans really have no shame?
Posted by: avatar_singh on Nov 24, 2008 11:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where is the anger and angiush of the masses who were promised change only 3 weeks ago and here we have the same type of corrupt oligarchy shamelessly parading themselves with all the ill gotten boyy safe in their vulat?
americans really are so corrupt and shmeless that the business polictician class has got a good me4asure of american mind and rightly exploit them.
obama team smells of rotten fish-recycled from 90s and 80s era.
but then americans donto believe in economy they belive in piracy just like their master the english race belives in piracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: obama one trick wizard Posted by: avatar_singh
» RE: obama one trick wizard Posted by: avatar_singh