Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Will Gen. Jim Jones Be Obama's National Security Advisor?

Posted by Chris Bowers, Open Left at 4:42 PM on November 21, 2008.


Although not as bad as keeping Gates as Secretary of Defense it would still be a very disappointing selection.
jimjonesport

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

CNN is reporting that retired General Jim Jones is the leading candidate to become Obama's national security advisor. There is good reason to believe this reporting, given that Jones was one of sixteen names on the "semi-short list" for Obama's Vice-President. While Jones was taken out of contention when it was revealed he supported John McCain, in the third debate Obama still mentioned him as an advisor he would "surround" himself with when elected President. So yeah, this report is probably accurate.

Although not as bad as keeping Gates as Secretary of Defense (I'm not sure any cabinet appointment could be that bad), it would still be a very disappointing selection. Jones, as already noted, supported McCain, and was also offered the deputy Secretary of State job in the Bush administration. He turned the offer down, but turning down an offer like that from the Bush administration in mid-2007 isn't exactly a progressive master stroke. Not many people are keen to jump on board an administration with a sub-30% approval rating and only twenty months left in office.

 

Let's say that all of the leading contenders for Obama's national security team end up in his administration. This would give him a core foreign policy team of Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Janet Napolitano, Jim Jones, and Robert Gates. That is, overall, a center-right foreign policy team lacking any clear progressives (at least, foreign policy and national security progressives). All of them, with the possible exception of Jones, supported the Iraq war from the outset. At least two of them, Gates and Napolitano, opposed withdrawing troops as recently as 2007 (although the new agreement with Iraq has rendered that debate moot). Also, two members of this group, Gates and Jones, supported McCain. This team would oversee roughly 60% of discretionary federal budget spending, military operations, and all diplomatic relations.

I know everyone is obsessed with the "team of rivals" idea right now, but I feel incredibly frustrated. Even after two landslide elections in a row, are our only governing options as a nation either all right-wing Republicans, or a centrist mixture of Democrats and Republicans? Isn't there ever a point when we can get an actual Democratic administration? Also, why isn't there a single member of Obama's cabinet who will be advising him from the left? It seems to me as though there is a team of rivals, except for the left, which is left off the team entirely.

It is just so very frustrating. It seems like the only place progressives are making any gains is in the House. We are being entirely left out of Obama's major appointments so far. I guess everyone gets to play in Obama's administration, except progressives. Adam B and I talked about this subject for an hour today on Radio Times, and you can listen to it here.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, nsa, jim jones


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Surprised?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Nov 21, 2008 7:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're surprised, you weren't paying attention. He telegraphed all of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Surprised? Posted by: ranchero42
jim jones
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 22, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's build a new jonestown for the repigs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I got raked over the coals on this forum when I predicted all of this.
Posted by: Prophit on Nov 22, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... many times. What was frustrating about it is I supplied the links, the detailed information about his major advisors from the CFR and what they would do if he were elected.

I said it would be a "hawk" administration, Israel would by very influential and Zbig would keep us not only in the current wars but begin new ones and here we are with all those who are hawks now on board not to mention all previous FED RES, WALL STREET BANKERS, AND AIPAC minions.

This is way worse than just not having any progressives on there, its a continuation of the same types of appointments if not the exact same such as Gates. Talk about no gaps in the war plans... we don't need a "transition" group given we will be following the same empire building as Bush.... no change and easy transition.

If we were going to have "Change you can count on", it would be a much tougher transition... too bad no one wanted to listen before we got to this place.

Now its only up to us.... we are going to have to be the change we want... get ready to make that decision and I don't think it will be too far away so begin thinking about it now. I am surprised he didn't put Cheney in charge of energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» waynep Posted by: waynep
THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE UNLESS THE WAY RACES FOR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Nov 23, 2008 10:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
government are financed. Its all in the money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]