Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Eric Holder to Be Obama's New Sheriff?

Posted by Staff, Huffington Post at 1:04 PM on November 18, 2008.


Eric Holder, a Clinton-ite, is in place to be the first African-American attorney general, Newsweek reports.
sericholderlarge

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

"President-elect Obama has decided to tap Eric Holder as his attorney general, putting the veteran Washington lawyer in place to become the first African-American to head the Justice Department, according to two legal sources close to the presidential transition," Newsweek's Michael Isikoff reports.

Holder, who served as deputy attorney general during the Clinton administration, still has to undergo a formal "vetting" review by the Obama transition team before the selection is final and is publicly announced, said one of the sources, who asked not to be identified talking about the transition process. But in the discussions over the past few days, Obama offered Holder the job and he accepted, the source said. The announcement is not likely until after Obama announces his choices to lead the Treasury and State departments.

Holder, 57, has been on Obama's "short list" for attorney general from the outset. A partner at the D.C. law firm of Covington & Burling, Holder served as co-chief (along with Caroline Kennedy) of Obama's vice-presidential selection process. He also actively campaigned for Obama throughout the year and grew personally close to the president-elect. Holder has not returned a call seeking comment; the Obama transition team did not respond to e-mail messages.

The American Lawyer looks at Obama and Holder's relationship:

 

Given Holder's social circle, it was perhaps inevitable that soon after Barack Obama became the lone African-American in the U.S. Senate, they would meet. In 2004 Holder was invited to a small dinner party hosted by Ann Walker Marchant, a niece of Vernon Jordan and a former Clinton administration White House aide. The gathering was planned to welcome Obama to Washington. Obama and Holder, seated next to one another, found that they had a lot in common. The two men, both tall and thin, each had immigrant fathers, went to Ivy Leagues schools (both attended Columbia College as undergraduates), played basketball, and, of course, believed passionately in public service. "We just clicked," says Holder matter-of-factly.

 

Holder says he immediately sensed Obama's talent. And despite the 10 years that separated them, he found someone who thought similarly about race. "I think we share a worldview," he says. "[Obama] is not defined by his race. He's proud of it, cognizant of the pernicious effect that race has had in our history but not defined by it."

The two kept in touch sporadically over the next couple of years. On occasion, Obama's Senate staffers asked Holder for his opinion on crime policy issues. Holder also co-hosted a fundraiser for an Obama political action committee. Then, during the spring of 2007, a few months after Obama announced he was running for president, he called Holder to ask him formally to join the campaign.

"I said, 'Come on, you don't have to sell me on this,'" recalls Holder. "I'm in."

Some more details about Holder from the American Bar Association Journal:

Holder and Obama have been friends since they hit it off at a dinner party in 2004. He is the consummate Washington insider -- a familiar fixture in the Clinton administration, but well-known to Republican administrations as well. Best known as a prosecutor, Holder was fresh out of law school when he was assigned to the newly formed public integrity section of the Justice Department. There, he helped prosecute several high-profile defendants, including a judge, a diplomat, an assistant U.S. attorney and a leading organized crime figure.

 

 

 

President Reagan nominated him to a D.C. judgeship and he was later tapped by President Clinton to serve as D.C.'s U.S. attorney. In 1997, Clinton elevated him to the No. 2 job in the Justice Department, and he briefly served as acting attorney general in the Bush administration while nominee John Ashcroft was being confirmed. In 1999, Holder helped convince Republi­cans to scrap independent counsel investigations, successfully arguing before Congress that wrongdoing by public officials can, and should, be handled by the Justice Depart­ment. And should he be tapped as the nation's chief law enforcement official, Republicans may ask him to revisit that.

The basic facts on Holder, from the Washington Post:

Credentials: Former judge, D.C. Superior Court; former deputy attorney general in the Justice Department; former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

What he offers: Holder has extensive experience in the criminal justice system and with civil court disputes. He staunchly backed community policing programs to reduce violent crime and raised morale within the Justice Department during his tenure. Holder served as a co-chairman of the Obama presidential campaign.

Vetting: Holder took flak in 2001 for failing to object to a last-minute pardon request for fugitive Marc Rich, whose ex-wife is a prolific Democratic Party donor, when others in the Clinton administration pushed through the petition during its last hours in office.

 

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, washington dc, doj, attorney general, eric holder


Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere
Someplace where they're all wusses.
Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009.
What Sarah Palin's "Jewish people will be flocking to Israel" prediction really means
Palin's associated with a religious tendency whose leaders promote anti-Jewish conspiracy theory
Post by Bruce Wilson. November 21, 2009.
Considering a Faux Turkey for the Holidays? Better Read This First
A review of four "birds" -- and it's not pretty.
Post by Tara Lohan. November 21, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama just BLEW an opportunity
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 18, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to show he would appoint someone who embodied integrity and belief in the RULE OF LAW to become Attorney General.

He fucking blew it with Holder. Holder represented Chiquita International against the US Justice Department. He continues to represent Chiquita in the civil suit written about below:

From Reuters...

MIAMI, June 14 (2007) (Reuters) - Relatives of 22 people killed by Colombian paramilitaries filed a U.S. civil damages lawsuit against the Chiquita banana company, which has admitted paying off violent guerrilla groups, the plaintiffs' lawyers said on Thursday.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a week after a similar suit was filed in Washington on behalf of other victims of the AUC, or United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia.

The Florida lawsuit seeks unspecified damages for families of 22 AUC victims, who lived on Chiquita plantations or in nearby villages in Colombia, plaintiffs' attorney William Wichmann said. The victims died between 1997 and 2004 in the banana-growing region of Uraba in northwestern Colombia.

"They were all murdered, including a teacher, a student and an 8-year-old child who was hit by a stray bullet, but nonetheless was murdered," Wichmann said.

The AUC is accused of carrying out massacres during Colombia's long-running guerrilla war before it began disarming in 2003.

In a March agreement with the U.S. Justice Department, Chiquita Brands International Inc. agreed to pay a $25 million fine to settle a criminal complaint accusing it of paying the AUC more than $1.7 million from 1997 to 2004. The U.S. government has declared the AUC a foreign terrorist organization.

Chiquita, one of the world's largest banana producers, also acknowledged past payments to the rival FARC paramilitary group.


He represented Chiquita who was paying off (with both cash and weapons) two warring terrorist groups who were murdering innocent Chiquita employees in Colombia. Yeah. Nice guy.

Thanks a lot, Barack. You just blew a giant hole through my hope for a brighter future and a hope we would see criminal prosecutions for the thieves and criminals currently occupying the White House!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: EncinoM! Posted by: Longdream
» RE: ncinoM! Posted by: Quannah
» RE: EncinoM! Posted by: Longdream
What Might Have Been...
Posted by: mishawaka on Nov 18, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Edwards for Attorney General. It would have been sweet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, now are you Obama fans ready to...
Posted by: photon's feather on Nov 19, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
finish wiping the stars out of your eyes and see the reality some of us have been trying for months
to acquaint you with? Obama is just another corporatist militarist.

He's a liar who will promise anything to get what he wants - and will break that promise as soon thereafter as is most convenient for him.

I reminded everybody that his very campaign was a broken promise. After his speech following
the Democratic convention, he was asked whether, should he be elected to the Senate, he would promise to finish out his term, no matter how good a run for the Presidency might look. He did
so promise.

Nobody has yet proffered answers to my questions: Why would anyone ask such a question of someone who was just running for his first term in any office higher than a state legislature? Who was floating that balloon, and why? Or is everyone by now willing to agree that the people were bamboozled by the Democratic "leadership"?

A real puzzle: Why did so few people find that query surprising, if they took note of it at all? (I haven't read a response from anyone who even recalls the query having been made.)

Obama: Change you can not believe in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's the definition of "relevant"... Posted by: photon's feather