Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Palin the Car Crash: Why Can't We Stop Watching?

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 3:02 AM on November 13, 2008.


The American public (and media) just can't seem to quit Sarah Palin.
swinkatmelarge

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday afternoon, Atrios noted, "Sarah Palin is still getting more press attention than Joe the Biden, and he's going to be Vice President and she's not." Soon after, CNN's Jack Cafferty added, "When's the last time a losing vice presidential candidate was still in the news a week after the election? Nobody seems interested in interviewing Joe Biden, or for that matter, John McCain. But we just don't seem to be able to get enough of Sarah Palin."

They're both right, of course. Palin was a ridiculous candidate on a failed ticket. Her candidacy was a national embarrassment, and insult to our political system. And yet, like a car crash, it's hard to turn away.

At first blush, it's hard to put one's finger on why, exactly. Maybe we haven't quite gotten out of "campaign mode." Or perhaps some are thinking ahead, keeping an eye on Palin with an expectation that she'll seek national office again fairly soon.

But I think it's more than that. Kevin noted this afternoon, "We've simply never seen someone so completely unmoored from the normal requirements of national office before." I not only think that's right, I also think we're still coming to terms with just how serious this fiasco really was.

Given this, Andrew Sullivan had a very compelling item explaining why Palin may be history, but "she is history that matter:"

Let's be real in a way the national media seems incapable of: this person should never have been placed on a national ticket in a mature democracy. She was incapable of running a town in Alaska competently. The impulsive, unvetted selection of a total unknown, with no knowledge of or interest in the wider world, as a replacement president remains one of the most disturbing events in modern American history. That the press felt required to maintain a facade of normalcy for two months -- and not to declare the whole thing a farce from start to finish -- is a sign of their total loss of nerve. That the Palin absurdity should follow the two-term presidency of another individual utterly out of his depth in national government is particularly troubling. 46 percent of Americans voted for the possibility of this blank slate as president because she somehow echoed their own sense of religious or cultural "identity". Until we figure out how this happened, we will not be able to prevent it from happening again. And we have to find a way to prevent this from recurring.

[...]

This deluded and delusional woman still doesn't understand what happened to her; still has no self-awareness; and has never been forced to accept her obvious limitations. She cannot keep even the most trivial story straight; she repeats untruths with a ferocity and calm that is reserved only to the clinically unhinged; she has the educational level of a high school drop-out; and regards ignorance as some kind of achievement. It is excruciating to watch her -- but more excruciating to watch those who feel obliged to defend her.

It's not quite that we "don't seem to be able to get enough of Sarah Palin"; it's that we were the victim of a painful and consequential practical joke. We haven't quite come to terms with what's transpired.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
nightmares ...
Posted by: Dankhank on Nov 13, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
know those nightmares you can't seem to shake?

this is one of those ...

How did we come to this ... as the writer says ... a mature democracy ... are we truly mature?

I shake my head when friends say they didn't like Palin as VP candidate but voted for McCain anyway ...

whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: nightmares ... Posted by: luzmejor
» RE: nightmares ... Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Don't let Palin use Wikipedia as a platform for 2012
Posted by: Jasonix on Nov 13, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some repubs have hijacked Palin's wikipedia article and are sedulously removing any mention of Thomas Muthee, Neiman Marcus, Pentecostalism, the kill-Obama threats, etc. Be sure to stop by, restore the information about these things, and then when it's deleted again, send complaints to the administrator so the article can be labeled as disputed and inaccurate - perhaps even locked. Be sure to put comments on the "talk" page about why this stuff is important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why _do_ we keep watching...?
Posted by: CanuckKid on Nov 13, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me, the answer's easy: every time the ignorant fool opens her mouth, she increases Obama's chances of re-election, and that makes me happy. It reaffirms my faith in the American voting public that 53% of you will once again kick her in the a$$.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why _do_ we keep watching...? Posted by: goeswithness
We keep watching because
Posted by: FLMom on Nov 13, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we finally woke up and smelled the Moose Stew simmering! We almost had one of the worst most uninformed off-the-cuff Vice President who would be President in our times! And while she's out there so readily talking to the press, maybe someone should ask her where her medical records are?! Bet she'll pass on that one because that's something we'll never hear about, even when she runs again and gets soundly thumped by some of the smarter more politically savvy Republicans who will run against her!!! Payback's a B**ch!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PEOPLE WATCH BECAUSE IT'S THERE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 13, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The better question is why. I haven't seen her on TV but I see the various news articles on the web. She gets an enormous amount of coverage for a woman who really can't do anything and isn't very bright. People blogging in their pajamas is not a newsworthy event. We have a president who continues to chip away at what's left of our country and we still aren't allowed to know what goes on in the White house. We should get a daily report on "Now what's he up to". Not some whiney woman who didn't get elected because she had nothing to recommend her and still doesn't. The media is starving for something to keep them busy until Obama takes office. They're still Afraid of the Bush/Cheney machine. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Theocracy
Posted by: Billiesue on Nov 13, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Pallin is extremely dangerous. She was nominated to the vice-presidency to push the "seven mountains" agenda of the theocrats. A major part of her belief system is domination of the United States by the various Assemblies of God. If one does not accept the faith of the theocrats, then that person should not continue to live. Ignorance and stupidity are often very dangerous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

make her go away by not writing about her, please - enough is enough
Posted by: eviltwit on Nov 13, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i would like nothing better than to see this pathetic excuse for a political candidate go back to Alaska and stay there - never to enter back into the consciousness of Americans or the world again - i would like for all you people to quit writing about her - quit inviting her for interviews - quit giving her any exposure at all - quit giving her credence by publicizing her existence any further - make make her disappear off my computer screen and off my television screen - i want to forget we even came this close to having one of the dumbest, most embarrassing, and most dangerous public figures of all time within a heartbeat of the highest office in the land - and if i hear one more thing about her running for President in 2012, i swear, i'm going to scream

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want her to run in '12...
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 14, 2008 2:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I might even be willing to part with a little green to help encourage her, I'd really like to see her hang herself and her party politically!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The coverage of Bible Spice reminds me of
Posted by: bitsfick on Nov 14, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the coverage of the death of Anna Nicole Smith. Insulting to anyone with an IQ higher than a sponge, but we still watched. On a more positive note the more coverage she gets the more chances to make a fool of herself and the more Americans will learn that she is a shallow and ignorant person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nixon Speaks: eternal hope
Posted by: Moore Hognutz on Nov 14, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Certainly in the next 50 years we shall see a woman president, perhaps sooner than you think. A woman can and should be able to do any political job that a man can do."
Richard M. Nixon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just checking
Posted by: 2dogarage on Nov 14, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, just as I thought.

Only ONE comment to the article on Guantanamo and 14 to this fluff piece about NOTHING.

Why do we keep watching Sarah Palin? Because "journalists" keep shoving this Tina Fey look-alike in our faces. One would think there's nothing substantive to write about.

I'm not just complaining about the journalists though, obviously their audience craves this type of gossip-driven tripe just like all the bad television that clogs the airwaves and keeps us in thrall to the minutiae of the lives of the rich, beautiful and famous, reaching to emulate their obscene fortunes while providing an "escape" from our own meager existences. Heck, even I want to know what color and what size and how many pairs of underwear Palin stiffed the RNC for...not.

There's an important article about closing Guantanamo in today's Alternet offerings and no one is there. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I can stop watching, and have....why can't you people?
Posted by: manderson on Nov 14, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....is it because you people like to see a good-looking babe screw up in front of an audience, like a perpetual blond joke? Kinda shows sexism on the left, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]