Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Can Obama Change Government Policy and Convince Us to Change Ourselves?

Posted by Arianna Huffington, Huffington Post at 12:00 AM on November 12, 2008.


Obama has not only been calm in the face of adversity, but also centered in the face of triumph.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

''On or about December 1910," Virginia Woolf wrote, "human character changed.'' We can be much more specific: "On November 4, 2008, just after 11 pm Eastern, America changed" (human character remains rather intransigent).

The change was driven by two things: our country's remarkable capacity for regeneration, and Barack Obama's remarkable ability to tap into the better angels of our nature.

You know something extraordinary is happening when even Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, and Joe Lieberman trip over themselves -- and their hastily discarded invective -- to say nice things about Obama and the "tremendous signal" sent by his election.

Sure, it's easy to see their encomiums as purely tactical attempts not to be on the wrong side of history, but they are more than that. They also demonstrate how certain moments and certain individuals are able to bring the best out in people -- even people who have shown us some of the worst aspects of human character. Because, hard though it may be to accept, the best and the worst reside in each of us, side-by-side.

As Alexander Solzhenitsyn put it: "The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either -- but right through every human heart." And the greatest leaders are those who inspire us to reside on the good side of Solzhenitsyn's line.

Obama does more. As David Brooks wrote recently, Obama's fractured childhood "is supposed to produce a politician with gaping personal needs and hidden wounds. But over the past two years, Obama has never shown evidence of that."

Here is someone whose childhood could have easily led to a life in shambles. But Obama has somehow -- and without, as far as we know, thousands of hours of therapy --succeeded in not letting circumstances dictate his life and reactions.

During the campaign, Obama was an object lesson in equanimity. Insinuate he's Muslim or sympathizes with terrorists, and he brushes off the mud. Hammer him with trumped up charges -- "sexist," "socialist," un-American" -- and he rolls with the punches. He simply doesn't let it in. He demonstrates that we have the ability to master whether we allow setbacks and attacks to throw us off course.

A lot has been written about Obama's calm in the face of adversity over the course of the last 21 months. Less noted has been how he displays that same centeredness in the face of triumph.

On Tuesday night, he could have waxed transcendent, he could have wrung every last tear and every last cheer out of the adoring crowd at Grant Park. But he chose not to. Instead, his speech gracefully touched the clouds a few times then soberly came back to earth, focused, as always with Obama, on moving forward.

To their great credit, the American people have responded to Obama's example by remaining remarkably focused as well. Despite the seemingly endless parade of meaningless sideshows trotted out during both the primaries and the general campaign, the public refused to be distracted. These kinds of tactics had worked well in 2004 -- but not in 2008. Obama's focus, his sense of purpose cleared a path through the carnival of clownish attacks and chamber of horror scares. And voters followed.

After eight years in which it has felt like the very foundation of our country was under assault, it is a testament to our democracy's inherent capacity for regeneration -- our ability to course-correct -- that Americans responded the way they did to a campaign so premised on an appeal to our greater selves.

A country can change only to the extent that the individuals within it change (and some changes come slower than others, as evidenced by Prop 8 and the other gay marriage bans that passed on Tuesday).

So it's back to Solzhenitsyn: "If you wanted to change the world, who should you begin with: yourself or others?"

Our president-elect is obsessed with Lincoln, who changed the country both by changing government policy and by using the bully pulpit to help us change ourselves. And our president-elect is endlessly being compared to FDR, who gave us both the New Deal and one of the most famous life lessons in history: "The only thing we have to fear, is fear itself."

Now it's Obama's turn to pull off this rare presidential double play.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Change We Can Make Independant Of Government...
Posted by: skizum on Nov 12, 2008 12:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My educational and professional background in engineering and industrial design (art) has opened me up to a broad perspective of problem solving strategies. Over the years I have also evolved my thinking and attitudes regarding our economic, political, religious, environmental and social constructs with an understanding that altering our human behavior is the key to creating a more humane and sustainable world.

I also believe that there must be a massive shift in consciousness to create a new paradigm that will make it possible to achieve the goals necessary the create a more perfect union, and ultimately, a more perfect world. This will undoubtedly require us as a human race to reflect on who we are why we are that way before any paradigm shift can take place.

I believe that it is a critical endeavor to identify the fundamental needs of the individuals as well as societies in order to have a solid foundation from which to continue our behavioral evolution.

This is the very question I am attempting to address in my project, the Universal Humane Needs Assessment project. The Universal Humane Needs Assessment is a project to specifically identify, broadly verify, widely disseminate and utilize an intuitively understandable set of needs and experiences universal to humankind. Identifying the metaphoric equivalent of, a 'periodic table' of human elements, is a critically fundamental basis from which we can start to reexamine, monitor and influence our behavior to live more humanely balanced lives as individuals and create more sustainable humane economic, social, cultural, legal and political constructs as societies.

I believe that this work can help establish the foundation for a massive shift in consciousness; we don't need government to make this happen, just broad individual participation. Sure, it would be great if government supported such efforts but can we really afford to sit around and wait for that to happen?

It is important for me to note that my project is developed from the perspective of where we have evolved to as a human race thus far, and its basic assumptions are subject to change as we continue to evolve. I find it important to address the reality of our current state of behavior by holding a mirror up to how things are, while fully understanding that things can be different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great Feedback Posted by: skizum
Policy and Ideology are why I DIDN'T vote Obama.
Posted by: -matti on Nov 12, 2008 2:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If ANYONE who tried to get me to do so would have used the STRUCTURAL changes he is already implementing -in the from of his transition strategy and actions- to convince me then I WOULD HAVE voted for him!

Just the "end-around on the Corporatist Media" and "boasting participation" website that he has introduced, Change.gov, would have convinced me.

But then we also get the strong stance on lobbyists in the transition and the "ready-for-inaguration-day" review of federal agencies.

And we're only at Election Day plus 8!

I guess the "structuralist" vote is fairly small, but we're SO much hipper than those tacky "personality voters". Why couldn't anyone throw us a bone?

november5.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» don't wait for a bone. Posted by: Beck
9/11 will not go away.
Posted by: weathered on Nov 12, 2008 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama- time for 9/11 truth and Bush/Cheney prosecution
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Nov 12, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am an attorney who is a realistic skeptic about any real change occurring in this country since the political system is completely corrupted and beyond repair. With that said, I am looking for the following from President Obama;
A country where the President and Congress tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
A country where the President and Congress are not in the pocket of the military industrial oil private central banking complex.
A country where foreign policy in the Middle East is determined with the best interests of this country and the world as a whole in mind instead of the best interests of the military-industrial oil private central banking complex and Israel to the detriment of the people in this country and the world.
A country where the truth about 9/11 being an inside job is exposed by the President and the guilty parties prosecuted;
A country where the truth about the Federal Reserve Bank and its control of the economic policy of this country and the scam that is is exposed and remedied,
A country where the truth about electronic voting machines being used to steal presidential and congressional elections is exposed and paper ballots are used at all state and federal elections.
A country where President Obama breaks from the tradition of letting the president's predecessor off the hook for that administration’s crimes. For the Bush administration, their crimes are Mass Murder, war crimes and treason together with a long list of other felonies.
I do not expect to receive any real honest, direct response. However, please surprise me and show me that you know what I am referring to in my comments above.
If you need information regarding what I am talking about (which I hope you do not), please go to my website which is www.911inside job.net.

Here's hoping, Joe, Webmaster of 911insidejob.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey Joe, are you an attorney? Posted by: Live Gently
» Don't waste your time. Posted by: brock_samson
This is New Age goop
Posted by: chlamor on Nov 12, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
sprinkled with American mythology. This manner of facile article has no place on a political website.

There are plenty of great articles out there why post this garbage?

I think I know.

Katrina needs to give it up and just remain at sea on The Nation's high-priced cruise ship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is New Age goop Posted by: Dboy
Yes but no. Gotta focus on local and state elections.
Posted by: maxpayne on Nov 12, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's where the power to actually increase the chances for change for the better comes from. Just ask the NRA. They started local from the ground up and nowadays they heavily funded and very powerful with a terrorists' wits these days. As long as the electorate stays the course on abysmally low turnout on local and even state elections, don't expect anything more than the same old bullshit in Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can Obama Change Government Policy and Convince Us to Change Ourselves?
Posted by: MHolt on Nov 12, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAHAHAHAHHA! What? Cnange "us?" Sorry. You have that question the other way around! It is GOVERNMENT POLICY and the contructors of those POLICIES which need to change! Perhaps Obama should seek to "change" the Red States, the EVILgelicals, and those hidden elite whom are his MASTERS. At least we don't have McBush as president; however, do not truly expect much "change" to occur within the system of Money Changers.

Naturally that would take too much doing; so, let us just sit quietly now and every once in a while, whimper and beg at the feet of the political engine to not grind those of us at the lower levels of the socio-economic ladder to dust!

M. Holt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Change Us?
Posted by: vkobaya1 on Nov 12, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha ha! No! Obama has no intention of real change, of being a reformer. Maybe if we had elected Kucinich, Nader or McKinney. Change is still possible with Obama, but the change will have to come from ground up. We need to change Obama and drag him along into changing the country. That was what happened in the New Deal when Roosevelt actually ran to the right of Hoover who was actually a very progressive politician for his time. But Roosevelt realized that even Hoover's progressivism was not going to work and he had to become more creative and progressive than Hoover, though it is possible that if Hoover had won, he also might have created something along the lines of the New Deal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Change Us? Posted by: Dboy
He's been president elect for 1 day more than a week.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 12, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're going to have to wait for an informed judgment, or barrel ahead with speculation.

Hear?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

real change
Posted by: sirios on Nov 12, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our leaders are nothing other than a reflection of the collective consciousness. A truly great leader will realize this and encourage his or her constituents to discover their own "common" greatness which in turn will enliven the atmosphere and create an escalating ease in which the leader can operate.Unfortunately most behavioral change is a process of rearranging the existing parts of the personality. Real change is not an active process but one of decreasing the mental and physical activity so as to increase the opportunities of recognizing that which unifies the parts. This realization of wholeness is the "common" field of life that increases self governing. It is effective because when one recognizes themselves as inseperable from wholeness then any action that upsets the whole is directly experienced as simultaneously disturbing the part [individual]. no one will exclude another if they perceive that person as themself . All of this is not verifiable through intellectual understanding,but becomes apparent when mental and physical activity are reduced, which" exposes "stillness and unity.There will be no lasting "change" on this planet until we all recognize ourselves as leaders. If a master [leader] does not create masters out of his or her students then he or she is not a leader worth following.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YES WE WILL !
Posted by: reelectnoone on Nov 12, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To their great credit, the American people have responded to Obama's example by remaining remarkably focused as well.


I believe we can continue to tap that energy to keep people involved with their government. I hope you will visit me at Joe the Voter to do just that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The emotion of Obama
Posted by: cbishopp on Nov 12, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if Obama will be able to truly make the changes we so desperately need, but the emotional attachment that people have for him has very much to do with the reaction or more appropriately the revulsion that we all have felt for the Bush administration.
Most of the population is desperate for real leadership and an intelligent individual to look toward in these trying times.
America has been shocked again and again with terror, financial crisis, malfeasance up to the highest office, and rising crime rates (much of it white collar) that have destroyed our social concept of security and trust in our government.
Obama offers the illusion of a hero for a desperate people. I am not saying he is not a great man or that he will not do his best and greatly help America, but he cannot be everything to everyone or reverse the massive changes put in place under the Bush regime.
Help him out. Be vocal. Educate yourself. Communicate.
Hero or not, he IS the change you make him become.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is going to be a LOOONG 4 years
Posted by: hilly7 on Nov 12, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm thinking this was wrote for Sheeple, new shepard, same sheep.

1st off, we DO NOT NEED A LEADER. There are famous leaders, Hitler and Bush come to mind, I'm sure you can find more. Then there were great Representives, Washington, Jefferson, MLK and JFK. Nope, I voted for a representive, no more leaders!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama the Great?
Posted by: willymack on Nov 12, 2008 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He certainly has the potential to be as revered as Linclon or Washington, but he needs all the support and help he can get from us. The rethugs will INSTANTLY begin a frenetic course of action to destroy him as they tried (but failed) with Clinton. A good start would be to prosecute the bush crime family. If this isn't done Obama would've squandered all the good will and affection he has now, just as surely as bush did post 911.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don Quixote on Obama and Change
Posted by: Don Quixote on Nov 13, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama performed the same "wailing wall ritual" as McCain. This should teach you something. You cannot be a candidate for Senate or Presidency unless you accept the AIPAC views, according to the declarations of the AIPAC president in the Dutch program "Tegenlicht" some months ago. Sorry for the bad news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]