Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The GOP Infighting Begins

Posted by Rachel Weiner, Huffington Post at 11:32 AM on November 11, 2008.


The GOP is fighting internally over where the party is headed and who will be the next RNC Chair.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The Washington Times reports:

A behind-the-scenes battle to take the reins of the Republican National Committee is taking off between former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele.

Neither man will acknowledge his interest in the post, but Republicans close to each are burning up the phone lines and firing off e-mails to fellow party members in an effort to oust RNC Chairman Mike Duncan in the wake of the second consecutive drubbing of Republican candidates at the polls.

The New York Times adds:

Mr. Duncan was installed by Mr. Bush, and the fight over his post reflects the effort by many party leaders to erase any remnant of the Bush legacy.

These struggles come as the party prepares for a broad ideological battle, in particular over how much to emphasize social issues like opposition to abortion rights and gay rights. Party leaders said the focus on those issues had constricted the party's appeal to moderate and independent voters more interested in jobs, health care, education and other issues that touch their lives in more concrete ways.

"We can't be obsessed with issues that are not the issues that are important to American voters," said Jim Greer, the Florida Republican chairman and a likely candidate for national party leader.

Across the party, Republicans described this period as one of the toughest in recent history, reflected by the scope of the losses last Tuesday but also by the recriminations that have gripped the party as it seeks to learn lessons from Mr. McCain's defeat and Mr. Bush's presidency.

[...]

The most important question for Republicans in both the House and the Senate -- and for the future Republican chairman -- is how forcefully to take on Mr. Obama once he becomes president. Richard N. Bond, a former Republican chairman, said he thought the Congressional Republicans would -- and should -- take on Mr. Obama aggressively. Mr. Bond suggested that Republicans should not be deterred by the enthusiasm inspired by Mr. Obama's election, which he argued would be transitory.

"When people wake up from their Bush hangovers, six months from now," Mr. Bond said, "it is my belief that they are not going to be buying into some of the things that Obama will potentially be doing. You have a real potential for these guys making a fundamental misjudgment of this election. They just didn't want George Bush anymore."

But Mr. Gingrich, a veteran of what turned out to be damaging Republican wars with President Bill Clinton in 1993 and 1994, cautioned against that, saying the party would be wiser to offer a broad idea of what it stood for and how it would lead the country, and pick its battles carefully.

Sam Stein wrote for the Huffington Post recently about the split within the Republican Party over how to work with President Obama.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Support Mike Duncan!!!
Posted by: Xynyx on Nov 11, 2008 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's OUR man!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is the future of the Republican Party?
Posted by: Mike U. on Nov 11, 2008 1:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I posted this on another blog, but it is relevant to the article here so here it is again...

It's time for the real Republicans to take back their party from the radical and religious right of Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Sarah Palin. The 25% fringe element which now controls the Republican Party do not represent the ideals of most Republicans, who are fiscal conservatives. They want to lead this nation with less government interference in their lives, without running up huge deficits as Reagan and Bush have done.

Only when the Republican Party moves to the political center, abandoning the radical right elements will they be embraced by some Independents who left because the GOP abandoned their centrist beliefs (dictionary definition of radical: favoring drastic political, economic, or social reform). The mainstream Republicans need to dump Palin and her radicals, forcing them to become a third party who would have to come begging for a piece of the political pie.

In 2000 Bush got the Presidency by way of the Supreme Court. In 2004, with the power of a sitting President and the nation at war, he eked out a 1 1/2% "mandate." In 2008 Obama trounced the Republican nominee by a whopping 6.5% while his coattails brought more Democrats into Congress. A groundswell that will be hard to reverse even if Obama is unable to deliver just half of his stated goals. We all know the 'poison pill' Bush has left the next President: a commitment of a $1 trillion gift to the banks, financial institutions and big business.

If the Republican Party voters are so narrow-minded as to select Gov Palin in 2012 (or will it be Senator Palin by then?), they will garner even less votes than they received in 2008!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Constituency?
Posted by: blackie4aces on Nov 11, 2008 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who, exactly, would make up the Republican constituency without the long standing dupes in the Religious Right? Obviously there is the traditional support of the corpoprate fat cats, but that sure as hell won't lead to less corruption and "smaller government" the dreamers of Republican reform would so ardently desire. They'll never get the urban, core city vote in less than several light years. Even in America, folks have longer memories than that. There are the suburbanites and the exurbanites who never feel they should pay for anything, including the police protection they think is their birthright when they travel into the cities to escape the boredom and total lack of intellectual and cultural stimulation of the burbs. Most, the beneficiaries of at least a decent education, also don't like paying for any investment in education that they don't directly benefit from. Or the roads that they motor on from the great distances they must commute to earn a living--usually to those despised cities. But even this crew couldn't tolerate the Reagan/Bush Republican agenda--after a pretty long while, anyway. Complete selfishness and self-imposed blindness has its limits, I imagine.

I really have to wonder what new, insane policies the Repubs without the religious, anti-government fanatics will have to come up to lure these folks back into the fold?

Well, there is always Joe the Plumber, I guess.

Satan's Neutral Corner
satansneutralcorner@yahoo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm going to sit back and watch them
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 11, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
eat their own.

I hope the party goes away permanently. Let something REASONABLE take their place. Anything but what we've had the past 30 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DECIDE BETWEEN POLITICS AND RELIGION
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 11, 2008 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By making their religious beliefs part of their politics they have alienated many faithful Republicans. Most Americans don't like the mix but they continued to try to sell it. In addition to the fact that it didn't work. We don't derive our values and sense of decency from the White House. This administraton has been a huge dysfunctional family. They set a horrible example and does anyone really want to be "just like them"? They over rate themselves and have a very low opinion of the American public. We're not that gullible. And almost all of us have much higher standards than they do. They need a whole new blueprint for success. I don't see that happening soon. They're too stubborn to see how wrong they've been. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Republican Party is a "zombie party"
Posted by: metamind on Nov 12, 2008 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Republican party is already dead.

They are still on the TV talkingas if they have a political future but the people have rejected their values and their political agenda. The party's over.

Actions speak louder than words. The Republicans have shown us by their actions what they support.

Never vote Republican.

Tell your Republican neighbors to "find a new party" or "become an independent."

Steve Moyer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

harriet
Posted by: Truelass on Nov 13, 2008 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sara Pallin was a joke and how in the name of little apples did anyone in the Republican Party judge this Governor to have a brain in her head. She was a hick-town floozy with an IQ that would be embarrassing to any low-grade moron. She lost the election for McCain from the moment she opened her mouth so leave her shop at Walmart and shoot innocent animals and help to destroy the Alaskan tundra and just plain forget about her...she aint comin' back..and don't forget to wink. With the judgement that the Republican Party displayed in selecting the Palin head-case the Obama victory was for all to see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]