Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Did Palin Use GOP Funds to Buy Her Children Underwear?

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 2:02 PM on November 10, 2008.


The Palin clothes story just keeps getting weirder.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

After controversy erupted over Gov. Sarah Palin's (R-AK) largely unauthorized spending spree, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK) announced that she would no longer be wearing the expensive clothing: "Those clothes, they are not my property. ... I'm not taking them with me."

Palin, however, did take some clothes with her. The Republican party is planning to dispatch a lawyer to Alaska to "inventory and retrieve the clothes still in her possession." According to Palin's father, Chuck Heath, the governor spent the weekend separating out the GOP-bought clothes, including underwear for her daughters:

Palin's father, Chuck Heath, said his daughter spent the day Saturday trying to figure out what belongs to the RNC.

"She was just frantically...trying to sort stuff out," Heath said. "That's the problem, you know, the kids lose underwear, and everything has to be accounted for.

"Nothing goes right back to normal," he said.

Reports initially revealed that the RNC spent $150,000 on clothes for Palin from high-end stores. More recently, however, it has come out that after campaign aide Nicolle Wallace told Palin to "buy three suits for the convention and hire a stylist," the governor "began buying for herself and her family." In the end, she spent "'tens of thousands' more than the reported $150,000, and that $20,000 to $40,000 went to buy clothes for her husband. Some articles of clothing have apparently been lost."

While there was considerable attention given to the clothes bought for Todd Palin, there have been fewer mentions of what was bought for their daughters. (At one point a picture emerged of Piper Palin carrying an expensive designer handbag, although it was later called out as possibly being a fake.)

One top McCain aide justified the Palin shopping spree by saying that someone needed to "spruce her up for national television." It's unclear how purchasing undergarments for her children fits into this goal. Inquiries by ThinkProgress to the RNC have not yet been returned.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
My kids do not "lose" their undies.
Posted by: schiffer on Nov 10, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep them away from priests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» REBUTTAL Posted by: schiffer
Throughout this entire episode
Posted by: wal55 on Nov 10, 2008 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Throughout this entire episode, I've been wondering if it ever even occurred to Palin that she should spend her OWN money on clothing - especially if she needed to buy clothing for her children. If she actually expected to get away with running up other people's tabs, that's an excellent indication of how she would approach spending the nation's money if she ever gets a chance.

I recall reports that the Palins have a substantial net worth; there is absolutely no excuse for her wastrel approach to campaign funds, nor is there any excuse for taking advantage of the republican donor who reportabily was shocked when the bill came.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did her kids not have any underwear
Posted by: xconservative on Nov 10, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before she got involved in the campaign? They do have a WalMart in Wasilla, don't they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS IS NOT COMPLICATED
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 10, 2008 6:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What was she authorized to buy and what did she buy because she just felt like it. Tally up the cost of the 'just felt like it purchases' and send her a bill. This was paid for by campaign contributions from decent people who had no intentions of buying clothes for Palin and certanly not underwear for her children. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THIS IS NOT COMPLICATED Posted by: waynep
Get off her case
Posted by: PakiBoy on Nov 10, 2008 7:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what if she spent that money?

I bet Romney or another GOP looking forward to running in 2012 is behind this latest smear campaign against Palin.

Palin lost; she appeals to the worst elements in the American society, but she isn't half as bad as the likes of Romney et al.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get off her case Posted by: Tombo
She should've sunk some $$$
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 10, 2008 10:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
into chastity belts.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ha! Posted by: schiffer
Palin, the spoiled brat
Posted by: luzmejor on Nov 11, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She and Bush are both users and narcissists. No wonder the party chose her. She is the perfect example of what "conservative" men want in a woman... sexy, but brainless!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]