Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In Alaska, Stevens-Begich Race is Far From Over

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 8:38 AM on November 9, 2008.


Stevens currently holds a tiny lead, but there are quite a large number of ballots yet to be counted.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Nate Silver on the phantom ballots of Alaska:

Stevens currently holds a lead of 3,353 votes, or about 1.5 percent of the votes tallied so far. But, there are quite a large number of ballots yet to count. According to Roll Call, these include "at least 40,000 absentee ballot[s], 9,000 early voting ballots, and an undetermined number of questionable ballots". Indeed, it seems possible that the number of "questionable" ballots could be quite high. So far, about 220,000 votes have been processed in Alaska. This compares with 313,000 votes cast in 2004. After adding back in the roughly 50,000 absentee and early ballots that Roll Call accounts for, that would get us to 270,000 ballots, or about a 14 percent drop from 2004. It seems unlikely that turnout would drop by 14 percent in Alaska given the presence of both a high-profile senate race and Sarah Palin at the top of the ticket.

But even if Begich were to make up ground and win a narrow victory, this would seem to represent a catastrophic failure of polling, as three polls conducted following the guilty verdict in Stevens' corruption trial had Begich leading by margins of 7, 8 and 22 points, respectively.

I agree with Scott Horton, the more likely explanation is that someone has simply "lost track" of a good chunk of the Alaska vote.

Palin and her fans have a vested interest in Stevens winning the senate seat. If he is reelected and steps down, Palin will appoint his successor. She couldn't appoint herself, but she could step down and have her Lt. Governor appoint her.

As I said before the election, I felt very relieved to see McCain falter in the final days of the election. When he couldn't remember Larry Eagleburger's name on Meet The Press, I found myself thinking, "Whew. Nobody's going to cheat for that guy."

I think a lot of people would stick their necks out for Sarah Palin.

Correction: Actually, Palin wouldn't get to appoint Stevens' replacement. Alaska changed the law a couple years back. There would be a special election. The next question is whether Palin knows this.

Digg!

Tagged as: senate, alaska, stevens, palin, begich

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Something smells in Alaska
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 9, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that they're having such a difficult time counting these absentee ballots and early votes is starting to stink. All the other states have managed, so why is it so hard for Alaska to get it together?

I think they already KNOW Stevens has lost. They just don't want it to be true. Which leaves plenty of room for there to be some serious shenanigans. If we look at the history of corruption in Alaskan politics, it wouldn't surprise me that they are plotting and planning a way to steal this one. A few thousand "lost" ballots here, a few thousand changed votes there... voila! Amazing! Stevens won!

They better get some serious Democratic Party lawyers up there to oversee this count, or it will very likely be stolen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Replacing Ted Stevens
Posted by: ACEwing on Nov 9, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wrote: Palin and her fans have a vested interest in Stevens winning the senate seat. If he is reelected and steps down, Palin will appoint his successor. She couldn't appoint herself, but she could step down and have her Lt. Governor appoint her.

I believe Alaska law require NOT an appointment, but a special election to be held within 60-90 days, to replace a U.S. Senator

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subversion of Democracy
Posted by: Xynyx on Nov 9, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of my favorite topics... here it is again.

I'll be brief this time.

I think we should have capital punishment for election fraud, bribery, etc... all things that constitute what I call subversion of democracy.

It could actually be a nice world if people who are willing to commit such crimes had their organs harvested.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Subversion of Democracy Posted by: tgabriel
» RE: Subversion of Democracy Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Subversion of Democracy Posted by: maestra
» perhaps you are right; however Posted by: aislinnluv
Given so much corruption and boomtown attitude
Posted by: Last Chance on Nov 9, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is there an Alaska Independence Party?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

george
Posted by: mopar1938 on Nov 10, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was always told that once you are convicted of a felony you could not hold a public office, what's the problem???? He was cconvicted and should get a jail sentence and be sent away.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF THEY GET RIGHT AROUND ON THIS GEORGE BUSH CAN GIVE HIM ONE
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Nov 10, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of his political pardons to go along with the one he is going to give Jack Abramoff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They hanged Saddam...
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Nov 10, 2008 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...isn't this the appropriate punishment for treason against democracy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]