Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Robert Novak is Flat Wrong: Obama's Mandate

Posted by Brian Normoyle, Huffington Post at 11:32 AM on November 6, 2008.


Bob Novak doesn't think the vote totals, reshaped electoral map, and switching of traditionally red states constitute a "mandate."

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

In the Wednesday edition of the Chicago Sun-Times, conservative columnist Robert Novak claimed Barack Obama's historical election last night was not "a broad mandate from the public" and the ensuing Democratic wave did little to change the political alignment in congress. Given recent history and the evidence of a shifting tide in American politics, I'm hard pressed to find a more inaccurate assessment of the outcome.

George W. Bush and Co. declared a "mandate" from the people shortly after his reelection in 2004 by a mere 35 electoral vote-margin. He did so despite barely eking out a majority with 50.7% of the popular vote over John Kerry's 48.3%. Incidentally, this 2.4% margin of victory was the narrowest win for any elected incumbent seeking reelection since Harrison beat Cleveland in 1888 and it was the smallest victory in all of American history for a war-time Commander in Chief.

Obama sailed over John McCain last night with a clear majority of over 53% of the popular vote and a 6%, 7.4-million vote margin of victory that is over twice that of his predecessor. And with an electoral-vote margin of nearly 200 (over five times that of Bush), Obama's win constitutes not just more than double the "mandate" claimed by Bush, it is an historic landslide by contemporary standards.

The President-Elect flipped eight Bush states to the blue column and managed to get two states -- Indiana and Virginia -- to elect a Democrat for President for the first time in nearly half a century. Solidly red North Carolina hasn't sent a Democrat to the White House in 22 years but they seem likely poised to do so this year, and the changing maps in this election weren't limited to just the Presidency.

In the Senate, Democrats were successful in unseating the incumbent Republicans in New Hampshire and North Carolina and won seats formerly held by Republicans in Virginia, Colorado and New Mexico. They failed to upset Republican leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky but, much like the races in blood-red Alaska and Georgia, the outcome should never have been in doubt or so razor-close. This is indeed a year of changing political landscapes.

At the time of this writing, it's still unclear whether a former liberal television writer from New York City will replace the conservative incumbent in Minnesota. And while it is true Democrats will likely fall short of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, they gained at least five seats and -- pending the unknown outcome in Alaska, Minnesota, and Georgia -- very possibly may hold the largest effective majority of either party since 1978. Democratic gains in the House were not of the scale of the Republicans in the last change election (1980), but they won enough seats to earn a majority margin that Republicans haven't enjoyed in nearly 80 years.

Some will say this election was a referendum on Bush and his failed economic policies. In order to push Bush as far into the background as possible, McCain made it a referendum on Obama, his policies, and his vision for the country. Voters answered with the highest turnout ever for a presidential election.

No matter how empty the narrative conservatives choose to salve their wounds of defeat, the unmistakable reality of the 2008 election is that America -- red and blue, young and old, rich and poor -- indeed gave Obama and Democrats an overwhelming and, yes, history-making nod of approval. If Bob Novak doesn't think the vote totals, reshaped electoral map, and switching of traditionally red states constitute a "mandate," then I'd be interested in knowing what he thinks does.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I call it reality-dysfunction disorder
Posted by: Drclaw on Nov 6, 2008 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..it seems to be an epidemic among conservatives these days. I suppose the CDC should look in to this, but Bush has replaced most of the scientists with folks who read the entrails of goats, examine tea leaves, and look for Jesus' profile on water stains on concrete. It will take some time for them to get back up to snuff. In the meantime, continue to expect similar ridiculous pronouncements from balding white men and women with bullet-proof hair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Novak is a putz and a yellow scribbler
Posted by: babs on Nov 6, 2008 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just ask Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DID THE LEADERS HEAR THE 21 ST CENTURY USA HISTORICAL MANDATE FOR CHANGE FROM THE PEOPLE'S VOICES?
Posted by: EXCELLENCES on Nov 6, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
November 6, 2008

Greetings Leaders, Citizens and Brian Normoyle:

We must now think about the task at hand for the 'Presidential Team' on behalf of President Obama. To appoint a Republican or two would project a spirit of sharing a bipartisan idea. This would be a great sign of give and take but would not break the gridlock in Congress caused by party internal differences of liberal-vs.-conservative jolt for earmarks, pork-barrels, on the behalf of their special interest group. Then after all of this being said and done, through negotiations and comprise, finally democrat-vs.-Republicans interests committees will repeat the aforementioned process for party keepsake. During this unsolicited, informal drawn out interim period, the government and people not only suffer but pay for this with many, many wasted tax dollars to pay for this antiquated process.

In conclusion thirty-two months (32) months of a watered down ultra expensive and costly concept drips or seeps through the congress and is given back to the President's Cabinet although by this time because of environmental, political, social, international, and community climate the winds of the original purposeful supplies and demands have changed!

The community at large needs bipartisan coalitions in the President's Cabinet, House of Representative, and Senate to expedite 'Crises Intervention", within but separate from the President's Cabinet if there is to be an effective collective action. The Presidential Cabinet possess the administrative and operational power of the pen paired with incentive chips, to encourage cooperative across the table bargaining to expedite mandate crises pressing issues.

Did you understand the inclusiveness, velocity, capacity and relentless indulgent driven nature in the Mandate of this election across the board? What historical vicarious momentum we witnessed. It was not just party, it was bipartisan with resounding voices of other legitimate political parties waiting in the wings to replace one of the leading two parties that fail hear and acknowledge the voice of the people. This has happen before in the history of our nation. Yes the Mandate came from leaders, citizens, people, and families uniquely, not just in the USA but, global as well! We saw a powerful ‘Mandate for Change’ for the 21 Century of the United States of America.

In closing an 'olive branch' was there to simulate bipartisan corrective action, but the model reflects the old traditional modern, primitive, 20TH Century business as usual concept. The sparing appointment of Republicans without an internal Cabinet, House of Representatives, and Senate will fail to support an 'Advanced mature 21ST Century USA government of structural change' to utilize of wealth of experts to expedite change that are solution driven for the USA in a cooperative progressive manner for the first time to expedite crises, like never before is a challenging advancement of change.

In spirit and truth, God Bless America!
E. RayE. Walker
EXCELLENCES

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hahahaha, great satire. Posted by: Prophit
Robert Novak
Posted by: Quannah on Nov 6, 2008 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been rendered irrelevant, as has been all the Republic Party water-carriers and syncophants.

I thought he had brain cancer and retired?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Robert Novak Posted by: ranchero42
Not a mandate??
Posted by: Aged Liberal on Nov 7, 2008 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the operative term we're looking for here is "Sour grapes"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not a mandate?? Posted by: missjibba
Novak is a traitor to this nation !
Posted by: TFYQA on Nov 7, 2008 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Giving him attention is like being his crime buddy... WTF ! I thought we had finally got rid of this piece of dung when he pretended to have brain cancer to avoid his prosecution foe his hit & run of some poor soul with his Corvette. Throw da bum in jail & this whole executive branch if you've got any balls & dignity left but don't peddle his vomit as it had any meaning... shame on you all for letting this piece go by... dignity mofo, dignity & balls America... JAIL TO THE CHIEF !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I take exception with that!
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 7, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author closes the article with the words, "If Bob Novak doesn't think the vote totals, reshaped electoral map, and switching of traditionally red states constitute a "mandate," then I'd be interested in knowing what he thinks does". I, for one, couldn't possibly be less interested in anything Bob Novak thinks or says.

I know, in America we have the right to free speech, but those who continually abuse that right through dishonest and damaging discourse ought to be held accountable. Bob Novak is not simply ignorant, he is wilfully ignorant, as well as arrogant and intractable. The fact that he is given time and space in the mainstream media, and that he has legions of defenders (O'Reilly, Hannity etc..), and does not stand out as an anomaly, should put to rest the lie that the media has a "liberal bias". It doesn't, of course, because the media actually gains an advantage for its true right wing agenda by self-labeling itself as "liberal". Sort of like the devil denying his own existence.

And let's briefly examine that term "liberal bias" while we're thinking about it. Liberal, by definition, means to be an advocate of personal freedom, open-minded, free from prejudice or bigotry, advocating representative government rather than aristocracies or monarchies. (don't believe me? look it up) So, quite literally, the right wing has created a term "liberal bias", that in fact means "biased in favor of being unbiased". Why does anyone listen to these morons? I suppose because they most closely represent their own views. And as "liberals", who advocate representative government, we're somehow committed to be tolerant of them? Or should we follow their lead and be intolerant of them? For right now, that's what I'm going with. Bob, Sean, Bill, Laura, Ann and the rest of you "conservatives", just shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Novak's not in prison?
Posted by: pb120669 on Nov 7, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the fantasy world progressives have lulled themselves into of late, Novak is in prison for outing Plame.

And Obama isn't a corporate shitheel operator.

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't you know...
Posted by: QuestionAuthority on Nov 7, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only Red candidates get mandates. Didn;t you get the memo with your red kool-aid?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two words
Posted by: realist on Nov 7, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brain-damaged

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two words, take heed, Quannah Posted by: ranchero42
Who care
Posted by: 4changenow on Nov 7, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could care less what this guy thinks. Try this repsonse --Not creditible not creditible not creditible (ya get it yet?)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who care Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Who care Posted by: 4changenow
Is this POS still alive??
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 7, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This jerk needs to go hunting with cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is this POS still alive?? Posted by: ranchero42
Why Isn't This Traitor in Jail??????
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on Nov 7, 2008 10:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who cares what this old fool has to say? Certianly not me! This man deserves NO ATTENTION! As a journalist he is already dead!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Novak is not in the positiion to say
Posted by: janelynne on Nov 11, 2008 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Novak is a discredited spokesperson. When he outed an American agent for political advantage, he sold out his country and his credibility. Novak is not in the position to speak with authority because he is not truthful. I am sorry for his health, but it still doesn't immunize him from being foolish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]