Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Immigration: the 'Sleeping Giant' Sleeps no More

Posted by AlterNet Staff, AlterNet at 12:51 PM on November 5, 2008.


Some early numbers on a key demographic changing the American political landscape.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

This is from America's Voice ...

Washington, DC - The power of the Latino vote is one of the key storylines to emerge from the 2008 elections. Latino and immigrant voters played a decisive role yesterday by delivering four key battleground states to Senator Barack Obama, lifting many members of the House and Senate to victory, and defeating anti-immigrant legislators.

While Latinos care about many of the major issues facing our country today, the issue of immigration both drove them to the polls and helped push this voting bloc to support Democratic candidates The relatively low level of support for John McCain among Latinos, closer to Bob Dole in 1996 than George W. Bush in 2004, is largely attributable to the fact that the Republican brand image is tarnished among Latinos - even for a past leader on immigration issues such as Senator McCain.

Below are some key data-points about the Latino vote in the 2008 election:

* The Latino Vote Surged in Size: The Latino vote comprised at least 8% of the overall electorate, according to exit polling. This works out to approximately 10.5 million voters, given the expected 130 million votes cast. This figure represents a jump of 3 million voters since 2004, when 7.6 million Latinos cast ballots, and is almost double the Latino turnout of 2000.

* The Latino Vote Broke Democratic: In 2004, Democratic candidate John Kerry won the Latino vote 56-44% against George W. Bush. Yesterday, Barack Obama won the Latino vote by a 66-32% margin against John McCain, and even won a majority of Latino support in Florida, a former Latino stronghold for the GOP. Given the increased size of the Latino electorate, this means that 2.9 million more Latino votes went to the Democratic candidate compared to 2004.

* Barack Obama Swept the "Latino Battleground" States: Both the Obama and McCain campaigns focused their Spanish-speaking advertising and outreach on four key battleground states - CO, FL, NM, and NV. Within these states, the Latino vote's rapid growth and break towards Democratic candidates played an important role in Democratic victories.

CO: The Latino vote in CO grew from 8% of the state's electorate in 2004 to 17% in 2008. Obama gained support of 73% of CO Latinos - key to his 53-46% victory in the state, as well as the Udall Senate victory.

FL: The Latino vote's shift towards the Democrats was essential in Obama's win. FL Latinos broke 56-44% for Bush in 2004 and 57-42% for Obama in 2008.

NM: Latinos comprised 41% of the NM 2008 electorate - a jump from their 32% in 2004. Latinos in NM supported Obama 69-30% -- a big jump from 56-44% support for Kerry. NM Latinos' trend towards Democrats played a huge role in the Presidential race and in handing the open Senate seat and two Congressional races (NM-1 and NM-2) to the Democrats.

NV: Latinos in NV supported Kerry 60-39% in 2004 and Obama 78-20% in 2008. Latinos in NV also increased from 10% of electorate in '04 to 16% in 2008, and played a key role in handing the NV-3 Congressional seat to the Democrats.

* John McCain's Support Among Latinos Was More Dole than Bush: John McCain's received just 32% of Latinos' support nationwide - closer to the Republicans' low-water mark of 21% support received by Bob Dole in 1996 than the high-water mark of 44% received by George W. Bush in 2004.

* Voters Broadly Rejected Anti-Immigrant Candidates and Politics: Voters defeated leading anti-immigrant crusaders such as Marilyn Musgrave (CO-4), Thelma Drake (VA-02), Lou Barletta (running for Rep. Kanjorski's seat in PA-11), and possibly Virgil Goode (VA-5) (race too close to call at press time), and supported candidates with practical and common sense approaches for fixing our nation's broken immigration system like Dina Titus (taking Rep. Porter's seat in NV-3), Bill Foster (IL-14), Jim Himes (taking Rep. Shays' seat in CT-4), Rep. Giffords (AZ-8), and many others. In the Senate, new pro-reform senators include Mark Warner in VA, Jeanne Shaheen in NH, Mark Udall in CO, Kay Hagan in NC, and Tom Udall in NM.

According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, "These results lead us to the following conclusions: 1) Republican hostility towards Latinos in general and Latino immigrants in particular is driving this fast growing group of new voters in the country into the hands of Democrats; 2) Candidates who define themselves as in favor of common sense immigration reform win their races; 3) If Republicans expect to emerge from the political wilderness, they will have to separate themselves from the anti-immigrant extremists that have hijacked most of the party; and 4) If Democrats expect to consolidate the support of these voters, they will have to deliver urgently needed policy changes - from economic opportunity to immigration reform - or risk having a growing group of voters swing back towards Republicans or become disillusioned with the Democratic Party. And these factors combined strongly suggest that neither party will want to go into the next presidential race with immigration reform unresolved."


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Legal v. ILLEGAL immigration
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 6, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is time that this very clear difference is acted upon.

Any human being who intends to contribute to a land to which he/she hopes to legally emmigrate has the moral right to seek to do so.
I'm a native American as, I am a causcasian who was born here.
I support those who I have described above as, they are attempting to BE a positive part of the society of any land.

Those who act in an illegal way are breaking the laws of whatever country into which they sneak.
They should be treated accordingly and removed/deported.

There are many Hmong in the small city in which I live.
I have gotten to know many of them and KNOW that their desires and entry into America is legitimate.
There are other ethnic groups who have do so legally also and, their presence here is also legitimate and LEGAL.

There are liars and denyers among those who support the ILLEGAL immigrants and those who speak out against them.
To support anything illegal is to aid and abet that illegality.
To speak out against it in any other way than the realities of law usually comes from those whose intentions are usually racist, etc.

If those who support immigration desire to be looked upon favorably and supported by the citizens of any target country, they ned to understand that it it incumbent upon them to do so in a positive and legal manner.

If a kid does not like liver, you cannot FORCE him/her to like it by forcing him/her to eat it.

This analogy is perfectly apt as related to immigration and its suppporters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]