Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The GOP-Terrorism Connection: It's Not 'Just' Palin

Posted by Paul Rosenberg, Open Left at 5:29 AM on October 26, 2008.


Conservatives are perfectly willing to embrace terrorism -- if it's the "right" kind of terrorism.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Noxious though it may be, there's nothing aberrational about Palin's refusal to condemn anti-abortion violence as terrorism.  The right has a long, long history of inciting violence, and excusing it, rather than condemning it.  When Clinton was President, there were frequent examples of this.  After the Oklahoma City bombing, the GOP Congress held hearings during which the "Militia" leaders were treated with deference and respect.

Then, just last fall, while Ron Paul was ramping up his "insurgent" presidential campaign--and in full denial about his past racist publications--he praised a couple who then engaged in an armed stand-off with federal officials.  I wrote about it in a diary, "Ron Paul Equates Former Militia Wingnut Tax Evaders With Martin Luther King", which included this video, so there can be no mistaking Paul's position.  The principle tax-evader in question, Edward Lewis Brown, was convicted of armed robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon in 1960, and was imprisoned until 1965.  But Paul compared him not only to Martin Luther King, but to Ghandi as well:

Hey, they's not terra-ists! They's just Gandhi with a gun!

Here's a couple of passages from Brown's Wikiedia entry I presented in my original diary.

First, the "peaceful" actions that Paul was defending:

Edward Lewis Brown (born 1942) and his wife, Elaine Alice Brown (born c. 1940), residents of the American state of New Hampshire, gained national news media attention in early 2007 for not paying their federal income tax and refusing to surrender to federal government agents after having been convicted of tax crimes.[1] After the conviction and sentencing, a long, armed standoff with federal law enforcement authorities at their New Hampshire residence ended with the arrest of Edward and Elaine Brown on October 4, 2007.[2][3][4]

And his equally Ghandian past:

Earlier felony convictions and pardon

In 1960, Brown was found guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon and armed robbery in connection with an attack on a man in Somerville, Massachusetts.[9] Brown was imprisoned at the Massachusetts Correctional Institute in Concord, Massachusetts, was paroled in January 1965, and was pardoned in July 1976 by then-governor Michael Dukakis, with the recommendation of the Massachusetts Advisory Board of Parole.[9]


As well as his "milita" connection:

Involvement in militia movement

According to an October 1994 article in the New Hampshire Sunday News,[10] Ed Brown was the spokesman for an organization called the Constitution Defense Militia and had become involved in the militia movement in late 1993. The newspaper reported that Brown designated various individuals and organizations as being part of a conspiracy to deprive Americans of life and liberty. Among the people and organizations named by Brown were then-U.S. President Bill Clinton, former President George H.W. Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev, The Council on Foreign Relations, the United Nations, the Trilateral Commission, the American Bar Association, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).[10]

Brown reportedly had stockpiled 18 months' worth of food, with weapons and ammunition, and believed that there would be a Federal government takeover of "private property, utilities, health facilities and the media." The 1994 article reported that Brown believed the militia was setting up its own "courts . . . for the purpose of taking back America."[10] The newspaper reported that Brown said he saw no way the conflict would end except in violence.[10] The paper stated: "Brown, who says he is an agnostic, admits it's easy to dismiss him as a nut."[10]

This propensity to violence is neither accidental nor incidental.  It is essential to the nature of rightwing conservatism--as opposed to the more temperate moderate conservatism of folks like President Eisenhower (or even Bob Dole, most of the time) that drives rightwingers bananas.

As I've pointed out before, political conservatism has a strong correlation not just with rightwing authoritarianism, but with Social dominance orientation (SDO) as well. And SDO is identified by scales such as this one (first 8 items are pro-SDO, the last 8 are counter, in order to cancel out "agreement bia"):

SDO-6 questions

  1. Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.


  2. In getting what you want, it is sometimes necessary to use force against other groups.


  3. It's OK if some groups have more of a chance in life than others.


  4. To get ahead in life, it is sometimes necessary to step on other groups.


  5. If certain groups stayed in their place, we would have fewer problems.


  6. It's probably a good thing that certain groups are at the top and other groups are at the bottom.


  7. Inferior groups should stay in their place.


  8. Sometimes other groups must be kept in their place.


  9. It would be good if groups could be equal.


 10. Group equality should be our ideal.


 11. All groups should be given an equal chance in life.


 12. We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.


 13. Increased social equality.


 14. We would have fewer problems if we treated people more equally.


 15. We should strive to make incomes as equal as possible.


 16. No group should dominate in society.


If you believe that "Some groups of people are simply inferior," and that "it is sometimes necessary to use force against other groups," and to "step on" them, sometimes, then terrorist violence is simply to be expected.  It's just that simple, really.

There's nothing abberational about rightwing conservative support for terrorism--provided they're the right terrorists, of course.  Such support is definitional, not abberational.

And so long as the GOP is in the hands of rightwing conservatives, it will be definitional of the GOP as well.  It is their choice.

Digg!

Tagged as: domestic terrorism

Paul Rosenberg is a regular blogger for Open Left


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
More 'Freedom Fighters' Ah?
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 26, 2008 6:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has our Water system been spiked with HGB, for a few decades?
Have we been secretly Lobotomized...Why can't some Americans REMEMBER ANYTHING BEFORE 9/11??
Why is it only a few of US can draw on Historical facts anymore.
Reason Holy rollers kNew about ayers is because they mcCain Campaign gave them a 'narrative'. I'm surprised they didn't try equating Sen Obama with the Black Panthers or Patty Hurst.
Why does it seem these people are surprised by these references...As If they can't recall them for themselves.
Why is it they can't make the logical mental connection between Alaskan Separtionists and the Ideologies of McVey?
Why does it not send Shivers down their spines when a Preacher says 'Armegeddon is coming' and WE have the Refuge....sounds alot like Charlie Mansons delusion to me!
Hell their Deductive Reasoning has been so stunted they can't even see their Religious rhetoric sounds EXACTLY Like The Islamic Radicals they are ready to 'do battle with'??
I So Appreciate Brian Williams asking about the Clinic Bombers...I thought that one Obivous nefarious connection to Palins ideas would go Unanswered. Which it was, but let US not forget, Not making a decsion IS a Decision.
Jesus Does ANY one have the Antidote to this Drug they have been slipping US since Reagan??
Funny thing is on the 'Conspriacy Theorist' sites I've read Tobbaco has 'Claritive' properties and that is WHY the Gov't is Trying to Push the Stop smoking issue.Kind of Goes hand & hand with the Fluoride 'Dumming down' Theory.I for One will not laugh at these Propositions since many of their Theories have proven themselves to be TRUE. This admin has not only blown the lid of many covert operations, but has lent credence to many other suspecions.
Of course people like Scarborough callthem 'Cheeto eating Tin hats, living at home with mom'...How to destroy resistence? undermine their creditability and Ignore the Facts. Beware 'Joe the Mouth piece' Propaganda is Illegal when paired with Subversive actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I actually met Ed Brown
Posted by: Uriahz on Oct 26, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And seriously? This is some atrocious journalism. The guy is kind of a nut, but the violence he was speaking of was violence against him and his wife by the police, who came in and took his property and his liberty because he didn't want to bow down and pay taxes for a government he didn't support. I mean, nut, sure, but it's kinda hard not to see his point. We live at the mercy of our institutional authorities, and all those who oppose the program will be severely punished, regardless of the relative merits of their position. Ed Brown was not and is not a terrorist. I mean, I know they changed the definition of terrorism so that it represents all illegal acts performed with the intention of changing political will, but that's a load of bullshit and we all know it.

Ron Paul's supporters in the GOP and among independents are NOT the problem. The problem is the actual living fascists in control of our government, in the administration, and lining up for McCain rallies. These evil plutocrats and their religious fanatic shock troops represent a clear and present danger to our democracy. Being scared of the anti-government nuts out in the wilderness is myopic-- we have bigger fish to fry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I actually met Ed Brown Posted by: mainspark
» RE: I actually met Ed Brown Posted by: Sedona96
» income tax is constitutional Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
» RE: I actually met Ed Brown Posted by: EncinoM
Compassionate Conservatism throughout history!!
Posted by: xvictor on Oct 27, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As conservative Catholics stormed a Hugenot stronghold during Renaissance France, a military leader-type cardinal was asked by his commanders how can they distinguish between catholics inside the fortress and the Hugenots, the cardinal replied: "Kill them all! God will know his own."

Terrorism wearing the face of Compassionate Conservativism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terminate with extreme prejudice
Posted by: willymack on Oct 27, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't that what our beloved sarah palin is advocating when she doesn't equate abortion clinic bombers with other terrorists? How about her "some parts of the country are more 'American' than others"? In her case, at least the extreme prejudice is literal, and not figurative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shades of Animal Farm Posted by: xvictor
The real terrorists are Republicans!
Posted by: Dana L. Stern on Oct 27, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Members of the Republican Party are the real terrorists now. I believe the Bush administration will use force to enfore it's will regardless of what the people decide in the coming election. The bush administration ignored the rule of law one thousand, one hundred times in the last eight years. I would not put it past the Bush administration to seize power and rule the country with the help of the military!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]