Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mob Like Tactics From Conservatives in California

Posted by Digby, Hullabaloo at 2:44 AM on October 24, 2008.


In California, you don't EVER go against the [religious] family.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

The bigots allegedly doing the Lord's work in California are getting really nasty. Now they are extorting money from companies that support gay marriage:

Leaders of the campaign to outlaw same-sex marriage in California are warning businesses that have given money to the state's largest gay rights group they will be publicly identified as opponents of traditional unions unless they contribute to the gay marriage ban, too.

ProtectMarriage.com, the umbrella group behind a ballot initiative that would overturn the California Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage, sent a certified letter this week asking companies to withdraw their support of Equality California, a nonprofit organization that is helping lead the campaign against Proposition 8.

"Make a donation of a like amount to ProtectMarriage.com which will help us correct this error," reads the letter. "Were you to elect not to donate comparably, it would be a clear indication that you are in opposition to traditional marriage. ... The names of any companies and organizations that choose not to donate in like manner to ProtectMarriage.com but have given to Equality California will be published."

The letter was signed by four members of the group's executive committee: campaign chairman Ron Prentice; Edward Dolejsi, executive director of the California Catholic Conference; Mark Jansson, a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints; and Andrew Pugno, the lawyer for ProtectMarriage.com. A donation form was attached. The letter did not say where the names would be published.


Is that even legal? More importantly, considering the context, is that supposed to be moral?

These people have every right to boycott businesses that support No on 8. It's disgusting that they refuse to allow their fellow citizens the right and privileges afforded by marriage, but they have a right to their beliefs. But I find it hard to believe they have a right to extort money from people who believe differently than them and threaten them with "exposure" if they refuse. When did that become SOP?

And naturally, these are the same people who have run the most dishonest campaign in my memory. I've never seen anything like it:

THE LIE: Four activist judges ignored four million voters.
THE TRUTH: Voters were far from ignored. Proposition 22, which originally made same-sex marriage illegal, was at the center of the court case. The California Constitution has not been this carefully examined since interracial marriage was made legal in 1959. Three of those four judges were appointed by Republicans.

THE LIE: Churches can lose their tax-exempt status.
THE TRUTH: Churches have the right to preach whatever they believe, and deny marriage to anyone on any grounds. This does not affect their tax-exempt status at all. Prop 8 would do nothing to protect this right any further.

THE LIE: Schools will have to teach about gay marriage.
THE TRUTH: The State of California does not control curriculum about marriage. They mandate that children are taught about the financial responsibilities of marriage, but not about what marriage is; that is completely up to the school and the parents. Parents have the right to remove their children from class any time they would be taught something about health and families that the parents disagree with. Prop 8 would do nothing to protect this right any further.

THE LIE: Prop 8 ensures religious freedom.
THE TRUTH: Considering some churches allow same-sex marriage, Prop 8 would actually take away a religious freedom. The judges in the court ruling took extra steps to ensure that freedom of religion was preserved. Prop 8 would do nothing at all to ensure religious freedom.

THE LIE: Prop 8 ensures free speech.
THE TRUTH: The court ruling did nothing to free speech, and neither would Prop 8.

THE LIE: Prop 8 means less government.
THE TRUTH: Prop 8 is an amendment to the California Constitution that dictates what a marriage is. It actually means that the government is more involved in our lives.


These people are pulling out all the stops and there is no guarantee this amendment is going to fail. California is in the bag for Obama and there's no real campaign going on here. But the "No on Prop 8" campaign is fierce and if you feel like getting involved, there are ways to do it:

Donate. The Mormons are pouring money into this thing.

Volunteer at a local campaign office. Or phone bank from your home.

One of the big problems is that many people still don't understand that voting NO is the way to support gay marriage. The least we can all do is make sure we are explicit in our conversations about that part of it.

Digg!

Tagged as: marriage, civil rights, homophobia

Digby is the proprietor of Hullabaloo.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Typical extortion practices of religionists
Posted by: Plexius2 on Oct 24, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is one thing to boycott products and even expose companies that support things you disagree with. But pressuring companies to give you money or else face exposure is outright blackmail. But this is nothing new--especially with the Catholic Church that regularly threatens its brainwashed, low-browed adherents with eternal damnation if they don't cough up some dough to support its twisted clergy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a thought... I know this won't be popular...
Posted by: Xynyx on Oct 24, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But, if this proposition fails, won't it just mean that they'll pour more money in to try to put it up a second time?

Might it not be better to kill this thing in court after it passes? It seems like it is still a blatant violation of the 14th Amendment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Your signature or your Brains will be on the paper.."
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 24, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exactly what Paulson's Organized Crime syndicate did to the Congress ( actually US- since they won't be paying the bill).Seems to me a real Public servant would forgo their pay until the mess was rectified since they LET IT HAPPEN! and Certainly a Repo of the CEO's and other Top brass's Shit would lighten the Illegally straped on Load they have placed on Our & Our kids backs.
So precendence has been made for EXTORTION- After 840 billion whats a Lil' strong arming a few hundred or thousand?
How can we continue to ignore the Unholy Union of Big Biz and the Inquisitors of the Religious 'right' when they are obviously working out of the same Handbook!
What Benefits from banning Gay marriage- certainly not me and my husband- bu the Corps who don't want to have to extend benefits to such unions! Hell the florists, the Banquet halls, the Caterers, the apparel industry Would LOVE more Weddings!
Having lived outside SF I can attest I would Love to have the benefit of their Festidious Homeownership too! I'm guessing, but probably more than I would living next to 'Joe the Six Packer Plumber'
And again what the fuck does it matter to me and my husband's marriage to have Bob & Steve living next door...It's only closet Homosexuals like Craig who must seek the anonymity of Public places
As for 'Serving'God, why does ONE passage/Line override the entire Messege? "In His Image", "Our Creator"....Seems to me nowhere does it say Satan Created Any Mortal.therefore His 'spawn' do NOT exist!
And for someone to Seize the Power of Judgement away from the 'Almighty' and lay claim to such Unknowable knowledge( How the Hell do YOU KNOW they are sinners?),they are taking Liberties and Priviledges WAY above their Pay Scale!
So their 'laws of man' are Superceding the Word of God!Not to mention the American Values which were founded on those credos..."All Men are Created Equal"?? 'With Inalienable Rights'? 'to Life Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness'?????
So go fuck yourselves Neo cons You Insult my intellegence, My Patriotism and my Humble Servitudinal Faith!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]