Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Republicans Disgusted: Palin's $150,000 Shopping Spree

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 7:54 AM on October 22, 2008.


Consider all the McCain campaign messages this steps on: "elitist," "small-town values," "big spender," "relating to 'real' America," etc.
slide46011031large

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

As Hilzoy noted last night, Sarah Palin has a new and unexpected problem -- the Republican National Committee has spent more than $150,000 on clothes and accessories for Palin and her family in just seven weeks. The figure includes more than $75,000 at Neiman Marcus in Minneapolis, and nearly $5,000 on hair and makeup. The funds were not just directed at the governor -- about $5,000 was also spent at Atelier, a high-class shopping destination for men.



The political implications are more than a little humiliating. Consider all the McCain campaign messages a story like this steps on -- "elitist," "small-town values," "big spender," "relating to 'real' America," etc.



According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, American households spend an average of $1,874 a year on clothing. The RNC spent $150,000 on one family in seven weeks. Frankly, I'm not even sure how one family can spend that much so quickly. We're talking about an average of more than $2,000 a day, every day, since late August. (Yglesias noted, "The total bill is well over double the median household income in the United States.")



Marc Ambinder reports that Republicans are pissed that Palin and the RNC could have let this happen:


There is already an attempt to blame the media -- as in, the liberal media would have looked askance at Palin if she wasn't clad in Neiman Marcus, but this won't wash. Republicans, RNC donors and at least one RNC staff member have e-mailed me tonight to share their utter (and not-for-attribution) disgust at the expenditures.


This sort of spending is without precedent -- the closest approximation for any campaign I've ever covered is make-up expenses for television interviews and commercial shoots -- and Schmitt's weakly defensive response tonight indicates that the campaign is deeply embarrassed by it and has nothing to say in their defense. Spokespeople have clammed up, a sure sign that they're trying to figure out who authorized the expenses and who knew about them. Did Palin wear all of the clothing? Where is it kept?

The Democrats are going to have a lot more fun with this than is prudent, but the heat for this story will come from Republicans who cannot understand how their party would do something this stupid ... particularly (and, it must be said, viewed retroactively) during the collapse of the financial system and the probable beginning of a recession.





And those are just Republican officials. Imagine being an RNC small donor this morning, and learning that your $20 went towards a whole new wardrobe for the Palin family, as compared to, say, helping a Republican candidate win an election. Indeed, what might "Joe the Plumber" think?



Ezra added, "Sarah Palin wasn't a beet farmer last week. She was a governor. Presumably, she had clothing already. The sort of clothing that was appropriate for giving political speeches and attending campaign meetings. You can imagine the need for a couple new things (lots of different climates, etc), but not $150,000 for a whole new wardrobe. And not $150,000 of other people's money for a whole new wardrobe."



At this point, the McCain campaign's spin machine has been very quiet, apparently still struggling to come up with a defense for this. I'm looking forward to hearing what they come up with.


AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: clothes, palin


Going Extreme: Demint Says Recruiting Electable Moderates "Doesn't Make Any Sense"
You thought only the left formed up into circular firing squads.
Post by Jed Lewison. November 8, 2009.
House of Representatives Passes Health-Care Reform Bill in Historic Vote
With the vote of a single Republican, Democrats passed the Affordable Health Care Act for America.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
lipstck...
Posted by: sherman on Oct 22, 2008 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can put lipstick on a pig, but it still a pig

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: lipstck... Posted by: kabac
» RE: lipstck... Posted by: GeorgiaBlue
» RE: lipstck... Posted by: gathaiga
» RE: lipstck... Posted by: Shey
» RE: lipstck... Posted by: Bibsisis
» RE: lipstck... Posted by: Bibsisis
Ivan
Posted by: sawdust on Oct 22, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously now, is any comment really necessary? This hypocrisy speaks for itself. This is also why I never give money to political campaigns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yes Posted by: EinMD
republicans? conservatives?
Posted by: wal55 on Oct 22, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't it Nixon who gave a speech remarking on how his wife wore a good serviceable Republican cloth coat? And that was supposed to indicate his/their careful use of money?


I keep getting the impression that Palin has found her sugar daddy and is getting hers while the getting is good....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Little Piggy Went To Market...
Posted by: gazooks on Oct 22, 2008 8:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and simply bought outfits to go with her multi hued lipstick selection.

Geez peepul, ...she's been stuck in the tundra her entire life thinkin killin stuff was fun and stuff, give the gurl a break!

To give is better than to receive, ya just can't wear it to rallies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's mean to kick a party when it's down,........
Posted by: tap17x on Oct 22, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.......but because it's the Refucklicans, I'm quite happy to join in. Ms. Kreashunist not only knows nothing about anything, her character is in serious question too. McBush really did it this time and I'm glad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No it's not. Posted by: EinMD
» RE: No it's not. Posted by: abbadon2007
Let me get this straight
Posted by: DrTony on Oct 22, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been unemployed for over a year now. We are having problems paying the mortgage and the utilities.

At least gasoline prices are going down.

Forget getting new clothes and Christmas doesn't look to be real cheery this year.

Yet, the Republican National Committee willing spent how much money for Governor Palin and her family. How are they able to do that in the first place?

Am I living in another world or universe?

Something is dreadfully and terribly wrong with this picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dude! Posted by: Ethical1
» RE: Dude! Posted by: cheryljohns
Gee, Caribou Barbie, got a new wardrobe,
Posted by: bitsfick on Oct 22, 2008 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what did Caribou Ken get? Doesn't Wasilla have a Mal-Mart. I mean that's where all the Pro-Americans shop. Every New Jersey mobster knows that you spend more on your goomah, then your wife. After all your mistress will do things your wife won't. And if you don't think the RNC is not a bunch of mobsters, you are living in a dream world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gertrude
Posted by: Charlow on Oct 22, 2008 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I imagine they had to sleek them all up to look "right" on television. Walmart clothes just don't play well on big time TV. I'm rather certain that Ms. P. and her brood take every opportunity that comes their way to get free stuff, especially good free stuff. One other thing ... I wonder where they all had to go and stay to buy all these things. You just don't make these kind of purchases online. So, another line of inquiry I think would be interesting is the additional cost incurred in actually transporting them all to these high-end shopping venues and where they stayed and at what cost. I would imagine that with those costs included, the price of all the new clothes, hair styles, makeup, etc. could easily double that $150,000.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paybacks a bitch
Posted by: AnneP on Oct 22, 2008 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been waiting for this to come out since the convention. It is obvious those clothes were all picked out by someone with real design sense and were VERY Expensive. Check out Sarah's clothes when she was Gov. and Mayor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What would a WalMart Spree have cost?
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Oct 22, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So much for that expensive John Edwards haircut--given Palin's shopping spree, only trying to help the economy. Right. Couldn't she have at least spread it around a WalMart or Target?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:No -no -no Posted by: scootenat65
Perfect symbol for the Republican party values
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Oct 22, 2008 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All show, no substance. And doesn't the Palin family have a $250,000 income? And she can't pay for her own clothes? GREED ! GREED!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Palin could have bought her clothes from WALMART like everyone else she claims to represent in
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 22, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
small town America. So to all you small town folks out there who still think Palin represents you, do you really think you can afford to pay the same prices on clothing Palin's paying to look glitzy yet sexist? And by the way, it's your tax dollars at "work". If so, you're making SPECTACLES of yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But she couldn't afford...
Posted by: kiel on Oct 22, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...birth control for her hormonal daughter?

Nice priorities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But she couldn't afford... Posted by: GeorgiaBlue
» RE: But she couldn't afford... Posted by: luzmejor
Don't forget the $300,000 banana dress on Cindy McCain!!
Posted by: Gretchen on Oct 22, 2008 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cindy McCain probably spends several million dollars on her wardrobe, being that her banana peel styled dress at the convention reportedly cost $300,000. How much do you bet their clothing was imported on top of the steep prices?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't blame the media but...
Posted by: Elmo409 on Oct 22, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can bet that if she wasn't well-dressed and well-coiffed that someone would be slamming her for looking like a frumpy housewife.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the other side?
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 22, 2008 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much are the Democrats spending for Barack Obama's clothes? He wears some mighty fine suits, although sometimes it is just a shirt and slacks, but they are made from really nice looking material. Don't get me wrong. I am voting for Obama/Biden, but let's be fair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: "Cattiness"? Posted by: Symp
» RE: "Cattiness"? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: GeorgiaBlue
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: What about the other side? Posted by: Bibsisis
» Actually, he wears old clothes Posted by: cheryljohns
But...
Posted by: johnshark on Oct 22, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why doesn't anybody understand that that $150,000 is going to trickle down and help shape the recession into a V rather than a U or an L.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But... Posted by: VZEQICVA
She can send the $$ to a VA Hospital
Posted by: weathered on Oct 22, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but that idea is way too far over her head, heart and soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about all the small businesses they ignored?
Posted by: pdxliberal on Oct 22, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're going to drop 150 grand for clothes - an obscene amount for sure - at least they could have targeted some worthy 'small business owners', the cornerstone of all their rhetoric. Then, after the campaign, auction them off for charity. But no - apparently Neiman-Marcus and Saks needed their money more!! What a bunch of stupid, self-centered, shortsighted fools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reminds me of . . .
Posted by: ConnecttheDots on Oct 22, 2008 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . the old hotrodder's creed from years ago: "If it don't go, chrome it."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All that money...
Posted by: msteryis on Oct 22, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and that's the best they could do? She still looks like she shops at WalMart! The Republican Party is obviously in dire need of a stylist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All that money... Posted by: VZEQICVA
Do they keep
Posted by: JefffromCA on Oct 22, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
their new wardrobes when they lose? And if they do, are the clothes counted as income, wages or gifts for the purposes of taxation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do they keep
Posted by: JefffromCA on Oct 22, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
their new wardrobes when they lose? And if they do, are the clothes counted as income, wages or gifts for the purposes of taxation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do they keep Posted by: peacefullaim
Do they keep
Posted by: JefffromCA on Oct 22, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
their new wardrobes when they lose? And if they do, are the clothes counted as income, wages or gifts for the purposes of taxation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do they keep Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Do they keep Posted by: peacefullaim
Clothes, condos and cars...
Posted by: USAFVeteran1966 on Oct 22, 2008 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin spent 150 grand on a new wardrobe. Her unfit running mate owns seven homes, including luxury condos, and 13 automobiles. Not exactly the way to connect with ordinary Americans.

But then, what else could we expect from "mavericks" who have their own code of hypocritical conduct?

Vietnam vet/Obama supporter
Eight reasons to vote against John McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hell, she's gotta look like a REAL Republican,
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 22, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
doesn't she? Surprised Cindy didn't take her to Paris for the full treatment. Gotta loook good among those bloodsucking CEO's and their wives that are supporting her and Ole Fly Boy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

where are the diamond studded six shooters?
Posted by: sirios on Oct 22, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, come on, don't be so hard on her, she can't travel about the country telling lies in a moose skin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American value
Posted by: ahmlco on Oct 22, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since a McCain/Palin victory is looking less and less certain, I'd say she's simply demonstrating yet another small-town American vaue....

Get while the gettin' is good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not only the "New Clothes" for the Republic EMPRESS...
Posted by: Quannah on Oct 22, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's the fact that she made the taxpayers of Alaska pay for the travel and expenses for her kids (and husband) on non-official business, after lying on her expense reports.

She's nothing more than a thief. She's willing to eat all she can from the Public Trough, just like the pig that she is. And it's only beginning! Imagine what could happen if she gets the East Wing of the White House!

There is a perfect term for her... she's "Trailer Trash" -- no insult meant for those who live in mobile homes, either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

waynep
Posted by: waynep on Oct 22, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aw come on folks. The Palin's net worth is only slightly more than a million...you can't expect them to buy their own clothes when they are that close to the poverty line. And a hockey mom has to look hot if she is going to influence those referees. (wink, wink) ya betcha.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 22, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have I got this straight? Palin goes to a governors' conference in New York, the meeting lasts four hours, she stays four nights and five days in New York, in a hotel that costs $700 a night, and has her daughter with her, and bills the State of Alaska for the nice little vacation, and this is the woman who is going to clean up corruption in government?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 22, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have I got this straight? Palin goes to a governors' conference in New York, the meeting lasts four hours, she stays four nights and five days in New York, in a hotel that costs $700 a night, and has her daughter with her, and bills the State of Alaska for the nice little vacation, and this is the woman who is going to clean up corruption in government?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lilly Posted by: VZEQICVA
Redistribution of wealth
Posted by: scootenat65 on Oct 22, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does this have something to the redistribution of wealth that Ms. Palin keeps talking about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great point, cootenat65! Posted by: USAFVeteran1966
anybody notice...
Posted by: babs on Oct 22, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... that her once-brunette hair is getting blonder?

dumb and dumber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too much irony
Posted by: SlyGuy on Oct 22, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here for words. Pig? Lipstick? Barbie? Pig-male-ian? Still a real American? All Cheney without the you know what? On and on it goes, ...

Seriously folks, everything about her says she has risen to her level of incompetence even as mayor of a small Alaska town.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A MAJOR SIGN OF INEXPERIENCE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 22, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a female politician she should have known better. It's important to look presentable but her clothes are obviously very expensive. Let's say not exactly a Mrs."Joe Six Pack" wardrobe. What also jumped out at me was the fact that this is not what she's used to. She just didn't pull it off. Actually she blew it all the way down the line. I have thoroughly enjoyed kicking this bitch around. Gonna miss her. Thank,s ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it possible . .
Posted by: Rosasharn on Oct 22, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Sarah had an arrangement with McCain, that if he would buy her new clothesy wothies, then she posie wosie for him? I mean, a girls' gotta do what a girls' gotta do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah Palin jokes
Posted by: fanny666 on Oct 22, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In general, I think some of the attacks on Palin have been a little over the top. She imposed a windfall tax on oil companies drilling in Alaska and then gave the money back to the citizens there! That's pretty cool. Certainly the rest of the Republicans wouldn't do anything that populist.

But, she'd been pretty crazy on the campaign trail and she's not very knowledgeable and I disagree with most everything she attempts to articulate, and so I will be a hypocrite and link to this list of very funny Sarah Palin jokes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sarah Palin jokes Posted by: casimmons23
» RE: Sarah Palin jokes Posted by: VZEQICVA
White trash
Posted by: frank69 on Oct 22, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
White trash = Palin. 'Nuff said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Putting it in perspective
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Oct 22, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
$150K is but 0.02% of what Obama is wasting his campaign spending on: all those TV ads and junk-mail flyers and all the rest which everyone ignores. So file this under "Mountains & Molehills" or "Missing Forest for the Trees".

And it's not like she gets to keep all the booty. The other stories I saw at least bothered to mention that it'll be auctioned off for charity after the election, though including that wouldn't have whipped people up into quite the same frenzy.

They've probably got a better shot at actually turning a profit (of sorts) on their capital than the Treasury does in taking the bailout bill money and getting into flipping depressed residential real estate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yet she calls herself a reformer
Posted by: Denver Dem on Oct 22, 2008 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This explains how she could afford Michael Jackson's jacket for that interview she did answering the 5th graders questions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From Day One
Posted by: skyeyesds on Oct 22, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew she was up to no good. She had her sites on McCains job IF he wins the campaign. Look how she got her job as mayor, then as Gov. They befriended her and wa-la, they had their backs to her and she went in for the kill.And it wasn't moose, or caribou either. She is where she is in Alaska because she is a person that knows how to use her stuff, and its not her brain.Why do you think she talks that talk, and walks that walk? UMMM I wonder?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm on a roll People
Posted by: skyeyesds on Oct 22, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope Alternet will let me vent just a little longer..Anyway for a person who has got this far and couldn't stay in one college for long, and yet made it to where she is today tells me she is a leach that looks for the prize at no expense. I believe McCain is going through the change which should have happened 30 yrs ago. Or maybe he is just who he is and seen an opportunity to allow the leach to attach herself for the ride of her life, or his one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How's this for perspective,
Posted by: Shey on Oct 22, 2008 6:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for the ticket that claims to be for "Joe six-pack" and Joe the (unlicensed, tax delinquent) plumber?
Palin's shopping spree equals my entire income for more than six years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

parrotuya
Posted by: parrotuya on Oct 22, 2008 7:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, I am tired of waiting. Where are the nude pictures of beauty queen, Sarah Palin? I know they are out there. When these pictures emerge, and I know they will...Game Over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hypocrisy
Posted by: Jeanne on Oct 22, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again, and again, and again. I find it hard to spend $30 on a blouse. My income for a year (gross) doesn't come anywhere close to $75,000 that was spent on Palin's behalf at Nieman Marcus -- the inside of which I've never seen. So, to literally put lipstick on a pig, the RNC has spent probably three to four times what the average American family earns in a year. After you set aside the mortgage payment, the car payment, the health insurance, the homeowners/car insurance, the life insurance, the property taxes, the income taxes, clothing (bought at Target) for the family, the gas bill, the heating bill, food, college tuition, etc., I'm thinking they just spent the equivalent of ten lifetimes of disposable income for most of us. That's some perspective of "real Americans."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hypocrisy Posted by: VZEQICVA
Lilly
Posted by: Lilly on Oct 22, 2008 8:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Question: The Palin campaign says it always planned to donate the clothes to charity after the campaign. (Yeah, sure they will.) Suppose McCain wins. Are we asked to believe that Palin will then start shopping at JC Penney? Or run up a little something up on her machine? No? So, with what funds will she pay to keep her family looking up to snuff? Nothing about this sounds very good. The sad thing is that yesterday at the bus stop I saw a young woman who had fixed herself up to look like Sarah Palin: upswept hair, bangs, glasses, go-go boots, and she had even dyed her hair to match Palin's. An image is being sold that has nothing to do with the reality. I think the name for that is A Lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon they had to do this...
Posted by: djnoll on Oct 22, 2008 8:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all if Sarah was not dressed as nicely as Cindy or Todd was not wearing the same blazers and dress pants as McCain, it would make it really obvious that the McCains live so far above middle America for their entire lives, they could not possibly understand the rest of us. I find it absolutely amazing that this is a topic at the moment, but when you look at how they have acted in this matter, you see a perfect example of how they will re-distribute the wealth upwards from small donors to their closets! It is a true depiction of the real agendas of the Republicans when they care more about appearances than substance. God help us off if they somehow steal this election. GET OUT AND VOTE AMERICA IN SUCH NUMBERS THAT ANY CHALLENGE WILL FAIL TO EVEN START! IT IS OUR ONLY HOPE TO STOP THESE ARISTOCRATS!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does she get to keep the clothes?
Posted by: undercover on Oct 22, 2008 8:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm guessing Sarah realizes Johnny's chances of winning are pretty slim so she figures she might as well get a nice new wardrobe for herself and the kids out of the deal.

Assuming she gets to keep everything after the election, her governor's salary should be enough to expand the walk-in closet in the governor's mansion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MAC Cain
Posted by: onevoter on Oct 22, 2008 9:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The RNC dressed up the whole "family", even the sperminator that knocked up Sarah's daughter!

It takes a lot more than expensive clothes and makeup to cover up the empty shell Palin has proven to be.

What's the difference between a slut and a whore? The whore gets paid for giving it up.
Looks like Sarah just worked her MAC-Cain Daddy!

Maybe this is the RNC economic stimulus plan...go shopping!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You think they could have afforded to xerox a copy of the Constitution
Posted by: cheryljohns on Oct 22, 2008 9:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that money for clothes - and they did not have enough to xerox a copy of the Constitution - so she could read it and find out what the VP actually does. She thinks that she will be making policy for Congress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Edwards Haircuts Vs Sarah Palin's Makeover
Posted by: cynyk on Oct 23, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone remember the field day Republicans had over the cost of Sen. John Edwards' haircuts? Payback's a bitch, ain't it?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The problem isn't the clothes, ladies and gentlemen
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 23, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is what's inside those clothes. NOTHING!!!

An empty shell of a woman who has NO CLUE as to what the Vice-President does while stirring up the worst aspects of the electorate with her divisive "real American" speeches. Her sum total of "foreign policy experience" comes to 12 hours in a 19 month period, ushering dignitaries to some fur and ice festivals (and in one case, dropping them off). She doesn't even know that the REAL dictator of Iran isn't Mahmoud Ahmadinejad(sorry for the misspelling) who was elected president, but the theocrat Ali Khamenei. She doesn't realize that her own state of Alaska has a form of that dreaded "socialism" in which the citizens there "share the wealth" of the oil companies, even those who aren't working.

That $150,000 dollars would have been better spent on a crash tutorial in Basic American and World Government 101 and a copy of the United States Constitution. I don't care what clothes she's in, the bottom line is that she's effing UNQUALIFIED and no amount of makeup or whatever is going to change the fact that she's dumber than a fence post.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

further proof that Repubs know shit about finances
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 23, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who buys their clothes at Needless Markup?

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]