Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

New Jersey Report: Sequoia Voting Machine Vulnerable

Posted by Steven Rosenfeld at 8:59 PM on October 17, 2008.


A court (finally) releases a report on Sequoia voting machines used in New Jersey and five other states detailing security flaws.
advantagemodelassetguide34a34a79bff4b7c8f0f11566853c942

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A New Jersey Superior Court judge on Friday released a report detailing major flaws with an electronic voting machine used in 19 out of the state's 21 counties -- as well as in all of Louisiana and a few counties in Colorado, Virginia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.

In addition to concluding the machine can be easily accessed by partisans who are interested in tampering with vote totals, the voting machine inspection report, "Insecurities and Inaccuracies of the Sequoia AVC Advantage 9.00 DRE Voting Machine," also described how the machine would fail to record votes unless properly activated. In other words, voters could be using the machine and would not notice that their votes were not being counted unless poll workers properly adjusted its settings.

The report, which had been withheld by the court at the manufacturer's request, adds to comprehensive studies of other voting systems done by computer scientists for the states of California and Ohio.

Voting rights advocates were quick to praise the court's action and the report's findings. They said the report underscored the need to replace paperless voting systems with back-up paper ballots, which can be audited and verified in recounts.

"As I indicated last week when the report was withheld at the request of New Jersey’s voting system vendor, if it indicated that the voting equipment was reliable Sequoia would have been eager to see it published," said Rep. Rush Holt, D-NJ. "Now we know why the vendor wanted the report suppressed."

Among other things, the report concluded:

"Anomalies noticed by County Clerks in the New Jersey 2008 Presidential Primary were caused by two different programming errors on the part of Sequoia, and had the effect of disenfranchising voters."

"New Jersey should not use any version of the AVC Advantage that it has not actually examined with the assistance of skilled computer-security experts."

"The AVC Advantage’s susceptibility to installation of a fraudulent vote-counting program is far more than an imperfection: it is a fatal flaw."

"The AVC Advantage is too insecure to use in New Jersey. New Jersey should immediately implement the 2005 law passed by the Legislature, requiring an individual voter-verified record of each vote cast, by adopting precinct-count optical-scan voting equipment."

"The State should take whatever action it can to detect and remedy these and other vulnerabilities and to provide back-up measures in time for the November election," Holt said.

Holt and others have urged New Jersey election officials to deploy emergency back-up ballots if there is an apparent malfunction of the machines on Election Day. Voters could also request an absentee paper ballot, by mail or in person, per regular absentee voting procedures, Holt said.

Other voting rights activists hope the report's release will prompt the issue of electronic voting malfunctions to be taken more seriously by election protection groups, both inside and outside of the political parties. Most of the public discussion by these groups have avoided plans to ensure the accuracy of electronic vote counts.


Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Obama Rolls Out Blair, Panetta; Vows 'No Exceptions' to US Values
"We must adhere to our values diligently and with no exceptions." --Barack Obama
Post by Spencer Ackerman. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Now we know why the vendor wanted the report suppressed."
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 18, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this election fraud?

Why isn't the vender being charged with conspiracy to commit election fraud?

I don't get why this is happening and everyone just looks the other way. It must be criminal to do what this vendor is doing. Why do they get to away with it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why?
Posted by: loxias on Oct 18, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think it through.
Last minute, the machines made by vendors chosen by republicans are found to be compromised.
It would then be easier to declare it lawful and honest to suspend elections at the last minute until a "fix" can be found.
I hope it doesn't go that far, but they are already inciting violence against ACORN and others, and they just put a military force on US soil to put down "civic unrest."
What "civic unrest" are they planning on?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is America Ready To Vote? State Preparations for Voting System Problems in 2008
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Oct 18, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday I dropped in on my local election board (serving Prince William County, VA). I asked specific questions about the integrity of the DRE (direct-recording electronic) voting machines (Sequoia "Edge" model) used; the chain of custody procedures that are intact; security, etc. I left shaking my head, confused and disappointed. The answer I received, which I expected, was that everything is okay, and "that someone would have to go to a lot of trouble, and why would they want to do that?" I reiterated my concern about the possibility of voter fraud. The few citizens there, who were casting their absentee ballots, were listening intently but appeared nonplussed. That was equally concerning.

I suggest all citizens become more knowledgeable of the type of voting systems used in their voting jurisdiction. As mentioned, my county uses a DRE system manufactured by Sequoia. Although it supposedly has the capability of VVPAT (Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail), they are not outfitted with this option in my jurisdiction. The VVPAT is a method of providing feedback to voters using a ballotless voting system, such as DRE, to assure voters that their votes have been recorded as intended. It is provided, and many experts argue necessary, to detect fraud and equipment malfunction.

Critics of DRE machines, including both activists and computer security experts, claim they open the door to electoral fraud, and if the security of the DRE software is compromised, election results could be tampered with in an undetectable fashion. In 2004, almost 29% of the registered voters in the United States used some type of DRE voting system, up from 8% in 1996. Expectedly, the percentage has increased for this election. These voting delivery systems have, needless to say, put the total electoral process into question.

For a thorough review of the current status of each state's voting readiness, go to the Brennan Center for Justice and study the recently released Is America Ready To Vote? State Preparations for Voting System Problems in 2008.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOULD IT DO ANY GOOD
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 18, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if everyone who has a cell phone took it in the polling both and phographed the screen before they submitted their vote? Then photograph the corresponding paper that comes up along side the screen. It's true that that there are more and more ways to tamper with the machines than ever before, but it's also true that there are many more watchdog groups and ways to monitor what's happening at the polls. We can't just cave into the Republican charade. Sometimes I think that's all it is. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WOULD IT DO ANY GOOD Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: WOULD IT DO ANY GOOD but some do Posted by: nochicagoboys
Action Needed
Posted by: loucity on Oct 21, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What actions are being taken to alleiviate these problems? The post talks about the problems but not the solutions - there is less than 2 weeks to resolve this for all the states mentioned. I'm in Florida so I'm especially concerned about this!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE
Posted by: zombo08 on Nov 3, 2008 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]