Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McCain's Not-So-Respectful Comment

Posted by Melissa McEwan, Shakesville at 10:20 AM on October 13, 2008.


But the Senator promises to run a respectful campaign ... right.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

John "Respectful Campaign" McCain serves up a little "respect" for Barack Obama:

Republican John McCain vowed Sunday to "whip" Democratic rival Barack Obama's "you-know-what" when the two presidential candidates meet Wednesday in their final televised debate.

…McCain said he and running mate Sarah Palin would continue campaigning hard in the three weeks left before Election Day, in places like Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado. The two planned a joint appearance Monday in Virginia, a Republican stronghold turned battleground this time.

"We're going to spend a lot of time and after I whip his you-know-what in this debate, we're going to be going out 24/7," McCain said.

…Still, McCain promised to run a "respectful" campaign in the weeks to come.
I'm sure he did.

Anybody else got a problem with threatening to "whip" the "you-know-what" of the first African-American presidential candidate in the nation's history? Sure, sure -- he didn't mean it that way, but that's what owning the context is all about. Just like it doesn't mean quite the same thing when you want to punch Hillary Clinton in the mouth as when you want to punch Bill Clinton, and just like it doesn't mean quite the same thing when you compare Barack Obama to a monkey as when you compare George Bush to one, it doesn't mean the same thing when you threaten to "whip" a white opponent as when you threaten to "whip" a black opponent, at least when you're a white guy yourself.

Especially when you're a white guy who, for example, has hosted a 2005 fundraiser for then-Alabama Lt. Governor GOP primary candidate George Wallace, Jr., a four-time speaker for the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC)—a group which Wallace calls "good, patriotic people" and was created from the mailing list of the old white supremacist White Citizens Councils, has been noted as becoming increasingly "radical and racist" by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which classifies the CCC as a hate group, opposes interracial marriage, hate crime legislation, massive immigration of non-European and non-Western peoples, and "Afrocentric" curricula in schools, and says of itself:

We believe that the United States derives from and is an integral part of European civilization and the European people and that the American people and government should remain European in their composition and character. We also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind, to promote non-white races over the European-American people through so-called "affirmative action" and similar measures, to destroy or denigrate the European-American heritage, including the heritage of the Southern people, and to force the integration of the races.
Those are the kind of friends John McCain has. (At least by the definition of "friends" his campaign uses.) I believe they're colloquially called racists.

(Which, btw, makes all of the McCain campaign's caterwauling about Rep. John Lewis comparing him to Daddy George Wallace all the more hilarious. And Obama's apologia all the more unnecessary.)

If John McCain didn't know what he was saying, or doesn't understand in retrospect why it was wildly inappropriate, then he's too fucking stupid to be president.

In addition to all the other reasons.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: debate, obama, mccain

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


Obama: 'If Paul Krugman Has a Good Idea … Then We're Going to Do It'
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman has been a frequent critic of President-elect Obama.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 9, 2009.
Kucinich Speaks Out Against Congress' Blind Support of Israel
"We must take a new direction in the Middle East.
Post by Staff. January 9, 2009.
TVA Responsible for Yet Another Toxic Coal-Related Spill
So, now is it time for clean energy?
Post by Tara Lohan. January 9, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I disagree
Posted by: Anne on Oct 13, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with the contention that it's impossible to speak to or about someone outside the context of their gender or race. (Although, obviously, I do believe that there has to be a line of demarcation for what is acceptable.)

Certain words or phrases are loaded with racist or anti-feminist baggage. A threat to whup someone's butt is not. It's a kind of quasi-folksy patois that's in common usage in a thousand ways in this country, none of which (in my experience) have any particular or specific racial context. (If I am wrong and this is an historically racist remark, I welcome correction.)

There is no statement, and especially no colloquialism, that someone, somewhere, isn't able to twist into an insult. Mature people, and I certainly count Mr. Obama as one of those, are not concerned with crying "foul!" about a common expression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I disagree: I disagree Posted by: sliver
» RE: I disagree Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Wasn't 'Whup' it was WHIP Posted by: Purple Girl
» RE: I disagree Posted by: luzmejor
Mac Playing not only a dangerous game, But an UnAmerican Game
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 13, 2008 12:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt the McCain camapign will be held solely responsible for any misfortune which may befall Sen Obama. Their Rhetoric has been an outrage and an embarassment.It Seems Mr.McCain has forgotten the inscription below Our Lady Liberty. He has Ignored the Founding adage 'All Men are Created Equal', In Fact he apparently has decided the idea that 'We are All Creations of God' is a lie.He has Rejected the Goal of remaining a 'Beacon Of Hope' for Humanity in the quest of Divine Servitude.
He spews hate regarding Race, Religion, personal choice and Political Affiliations.
This is NOT American Values.
Seems Mr.McCain does not comprehend What this country was founded on, nor any Commandments set forth by God.
As an Norman Scotch -Irish, Italian- French Luthuanian American, I will Not dishonor my Ancestors Struggles and sacrifics by committing the same Discrimation against other group as they had suffered when they arrived at the Feet of Our Lady Liberty.
McCains tactics are not just a Rejection of Our American Values, they are essentially heretical.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oops
Posted by: benzene on Oct 13, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forgot that Rev. Jeremiah Wright was holding a gun to my head when I, a white man, proposed to my black fiancee. How could I be so silly? I should be outraged and join the CCC today!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Flip the script
Posted by: Kym525 on Oct 13, 2008 2:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had Obama said that he was going to whup McCain's whatever, the right-wing wackjobs would have been all over this. It would have looked as if Obama were behaving like a thug (i.e. the angry violent black man). It's not PC to point out the difference in pereception.

I suspect that McCain was merely catering to his Joe and Jane Meth-head (oh, I meant Six-Pack) contingent, and they like that sort of bravado.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intention or Stupidity; Neither is a Good Result
Posted by: JohnJlws on Oct 13, 2008 5:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was working the Katrina shelter when a black acquaintance, a preacher, came up to me and said "You know John as much as you read, as much as you try, you're never going to be an inner-city black guy."

It was another poignant moment. I first started to become racially sensitive when as a kid I picked "Black Like Me." Later I read Dick Gregory's exceptional book, "Nigger" (even typing that word in this historical context gives me pause). I didn't have a black person in my high school until I was a senior and really only started to have more than very casual relationships with people of color when I moved to the south.

Maybe that's why I tried to learn not to pretend I know what's important to a black person and realize when I say something I might inadvertently offend. When I heard what the maverick had said I, a white person, went immediately to the "Oh my God" definition of that word "whip," especially in the context of Barack's race and the maverick's upbringing.

I believe any meaning I placed on the statement was not intended by the maverick, but that simply speaks to his stupidity rather than his intent. I'm not sure how much better that is.

I think the first step to understanding the depth of the problems we face as a nation is realizing the depths of our own ignorance, our paradigm, the framework by which we view the entire world. The maverick and the mayor have no sense of this invaluable understanding, an understanding Obama uses to drive his campaign just about every day.

I also am for a woman's right to choose for much the same reason. The vast majority of times out of a hundred, the woman is the one who cares for and raises the child. Oh, we're still needed a lot of the times to plant the seed, but after the work begins we sort of step out of the picture (not always, but mostly...still). So, I find the whole debate, when a bunch of men are involved, to be a little disingenuous.

All this to say the maverick should watch his, and the mayor should watch her, mouth. Closely. They utter some real derogatory stuff (and that perception is always based not on the person sending, but the person receiving) and I want to hope it's not intentional, but that just makes what they utter stupid. Maybe that's better, but I don't think so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CCC
Posted by: Magginkat on Oct 14, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CCC is nothing more than substituted letters for the KKK. The message is still the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]