Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The World According to Camille Paglia Is a Strange World

Posted by Kathy G, The G-Spot at 3:00 AM on October 9, 2008.


Announcing...the Camille-meter™

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 


When last we left Camille Paglia, she was in full swoon mode with the latest female celebrity who's giving her a moistie, Sarah Palin.



I must confess to wondering if La Paglia's girlcrush could possibly survive the brutal revelations of the last couple of weeks. Look at some of the things we've learned about Palin since then:


-- while mayor of Wasilla, she forced rape victims to pay for their own rape kits (at a cost of up to $1200 per kit);
-- as governor, she's made it clear that she doesn't give a shit about Alaska's epidemic of sex crimes and domestic violence;
-- she didn't know what the Bush doctrine is;
-- she couldn't name a single newspaper or magazine she reads;
-- she couldn't identify a single Supreme Court decision that she disagrees with other than Roe v. Wade;
-- asked to name what she thought was the worst thing Dick Cheney has done as Vice President, she answered, "the duck-hunting accident;"
-- she gave a disgraceful performance in the vice presidential debate, spewing out sheer gibberish and avoiding answering many of the moderator's questions;
-- she has made vicious and scurrilous attacks on Barack Obama, openly questioning his patriotism and his commitment to the troops, and all but calling him a terrorist.

Call me crazy, but I kinda thought any one of those things would give one serious pause. And that all those things in combination would most definitely be a dealbreaker. Particularly for anyone who identifies herself as a "feminist" and an Obama supporter.



Well, I thought wrong. Here's our Camille in her latest Salon column:


One of the most idiotic allegations batting around out there among urban media insiders is that Palin is "dumb." Are they kidding? What level of stupidity is now par for the course in those musty circles? . . . The bourgeois conventionalism and rank snobbery of these alleged humanitarians stank up the place. . . People who can't see how smart Palin is are trapped in their own narrow parochialism -- the tedious, hackneyed forms of their upper-middle-class syntax and vocabulary.

Oooh, she's nailed us, but good. We don't share Camille's worshipful adoration of Palin because we're elitists -- how fresh! What a searing insight! I've never heard anyone express that particular opinion before.



But she's right, of course. What snobs we are to expect a candidate for vice president of the United States to know what the Bush doctrine is. Or to be able to name more than one Supreme Court case with which she disagrees. Or to pick up a newspaper once in a while. Us with our "standards" and our totally unfair prizing of "facts" and "knowledge"! Not to mention our complete sentences and properly conjugated verbs! Who do we think we are, anyway?



I particularly savored Camille's novel theory of why Palin came off so badly in the Couric interview:


As for Palin's brutally edited interviews with Charlie Gibson and that viper, Katie Couric, don't we all know that the best bits ended up on the cutting-room floor?

Yes, I'm positive in that in the parts that were edited out, Palin shows off a powerhouse intellect that would put the likes of Hannah Arendt to shame. Katie, you conniving bitch! How could you?



But Paglia is at her most brilliantly insightful when she explains Sarah's unique way with words:

As someone whose first seven years were spent among Italian-American immigrants (I never met an elderly person who spoke English until we moved from Endicott to rural Oxford, New York, when I was in first grade), I am very used to understanding meaning through what might seem to others to be outlandish or fractured variations on standard English.    . Finally, as a lover of poetry (my last book was about that), I savor every kind of experimentation with standard English -- beginning with Shakespeare, who was the greatest improviser of them all at a time when there were no grammar rules.

Many others listening to Sarah Palin at her debate went into conniptions about what they assailed as her incoherence or incompetence. But I was never in doubt about what she intended at any given moment. On the contrary, I was admiring not only her always shapely and syncopated syllables but the innate structures of her discourse -- which did seem to fly by in fragments at times but are plainly ready to be filled with deeper policy knowledge, as she gains it (hopefully over the next eight years of the Obama presidencies).

Isn't that special? How lovely for Paglia that her many years of struggling with difficult literary texts has enabled her to figure out what the fuck this woman is talking about. Because I confess, when Palin comes out with one of her Dadaist word salad utterances, such as this, said in response to a question about "how she would help keep any new domestic oil produced in the United States," I haven't the faintest clue:

"Oil and coal? Of course, it's a fungible commodity and they don't flag, you know, the molecules, where it's going and where it's not. But in the sense of the Congress today, they know that there are very, very hungry domestic markets that need that oil first," Palin said. "So, I believe that what Congress is going to do, also, is not to allow the export bans to such a degree that it's Americans that get stuck to holding the bag without the energy source that is produced here, pumped here. It's got to flow into our domestic markets first."

Last but not least -- we all know that no Paglia column would be complete without . . . wait for it! Hey, how did you ever guess it? Madonna!:

As I said in my last column, Palin has made the biggest step forward in reshaping the persona of female authority since Madonna danced her dominatrix way through the shattered puritan barricades of the feminist establishment. In 1990, in a highly controversial New York Times op-ed that attacked old-guard feminist ideology, I declared that "Madonna is the future of feminism"-- a prophecy that was ridiculed at the time but that turned out to be quite true. Madonna put pro-sex feminism on the international map.

Oh, and there's much, much more -- for instance, you can find out why Camille thinks the comparison of Barack Obama with Neville Chamberlain is "a bit alarmist" (but only a bit).



All in all, I rank this particular column as one of her most awesome. La Paglia has truly outdone herself here. Brava once again to Joan Walsh, who a while back brought Paglia back to start writing for Salon again. Why, Ms. Walsh, you must swell with pride whenever you read her latest sublime offering.



One final note: with this post, I'm going to start a new feature every time I blog about something Paglia writes. It will be called the Camille-Meter™. With it, I will tally the number of times Paglia mentions the following, and then add it all together for a final score (though mentions of these made by the readers whose letters Paglia quotes don't count):



Madonna
Hillary Clinton
Gloria Steinem
second wave feminist(s)/feminism
"pro-sex" feminist(s)/feminism
Ivy league
elite(s)/elitism/elitist
Eastern or Northeastern
the 60s
(baby) boom(er/s) or "my generation"
post-modernism, or post-structuralism, or deconstruction, or (literary) theory
mentions or citations of her own previous writings
allusions to "my Italian and/or working class and/or upstate New York childhood/youth" (or variation thereof)



Here's the tally for this month's column:



Madonna - 4
Hillary Clinton - 2
Gloria Steinem - 1

second wave feminist(s)/feminism - 1

"pro-sex" feminist(s)/feminism - 2
Ivy league - 1
elite(s)/elitism/elitist - 3
Eastern or Northeastern - 1
the 60s - 1
(baby) boom(er/s) or "my generation" - 1
post-modernism, or post-structuralism, or deconstruction, or (literary) theory - 1
mentions or citations of her own previous writings - 5
allusions to "my Italian and/or working class and/or upstate New York childhood/youth" (or variation thereof) - 3




Total score on the Camille-meter™: 26

Digg!

Tagged as: feminism, palin, camille paglia

Kathy G Runs The G-Spot blog.


Why Dems Need Tom Tancredo to Receive the GOP Nod in Colorado
Democrats need a man that can inspire Latinos and other independents to come to the polls and vote for Democrats – Tancredo is that man!
Post by Mario Solis-Marich. November 11, 2009.
Dogs Going Crazy as Their Soldiers Return Home
Priceless.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 11, 2009.
Laura Flanders Live on GritTV: The Powerful Forces Keeping Status Quo in Place
Americans voted for change and are getting frustrated with the lack of it, but our guests have both written about the powerful forces holding the status quo in place.
Post by Laura Flanders. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Dr.
Posted by: lumenborealis on Oct 9, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the Bush doctrine?

Is it pre-emptive war?
Is it U.S. exceptionalism?
Is it the new interpretation of executive privilege and unaccountability?
Is it the professed right to undercut legislation with signing declarations?
Is it "either you are with us or you are with the terrorists?"

I share with Sarah Palin unclarity about the Bush doctrine. She should have had the courage to ask the interviewer, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dr. Posted by: wal55
» RE: Dr. Posted by: shd1230
Palin Around with Language Terrorists
Posted by: ty111 on Oct 9, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right on, Kathy G.
Maybe the reason Paglia is so quick to defend Palin, apart from her all too predictable "moistie" as you so colorfully put it, is that she too suffers from syntax reflux.

You might also want to investigate how often some of the "letters" she answers in Salon sound like they were written by her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Preposterous Paglia
Posted by: zipper696 on Oct 9, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Text of comment just posted on the Salon article:

Palin and English as a second language

Ms Paglia's spirited defence of Mrs Palin's contorted syntax and garbled sentences is extraordinary coming from someone who has to cleave to correct usage as her stock in trade.

Part of the requirements of a successful politician is the ability to communicate often complex ideas to their constituents.

Palin's stumbling attempts in the Couric interview with, surely one of the simplest of interrogators does not bode well for her performance as Veep.

If Palin were standing once more for the Governorship, or even for Congress, her folksy charm might endear her to "ordinary folks" and be tolerated by her colleagues.

But she could be, to use that tired phrase "a heartbeat away from The Presidency" and frankly, I, as a High School dropout, don't want someone who sounds like a simpleton, who thinks man and dinosaurs walked the Earth together after it was "created" 6,000 years ago and who rejoices in The End Times "in her lifetime" anywhere near the nuclear (or should that be nuke-u-lar?)launch codes.

In short, I want a President and Vice President who are more intelligent than me, and show it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sarah's a cronic yeast infection
Posted by: weathered on Oct 9, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who refuses treatment.

See Sarah for what she is; a mouthpiece for the spiritually impovershed to believe in. A country so thirsty for leadership and guidance they'll take anything that the media packages up.

Sarah is just a symptom of our soul sickness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh that Palin...
Posted by: GoLeft TV on Oct 9, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've got a great video based on the monologue from Eve Ensler, that really highlights some of the problems with Palin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b51zWRBUS2U

Enjoy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think it's an act
Posted by: eaajdjholton on Oct 9, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anyone remembers Dan Quale you should take a second look ar Sarah Palin and say hmmmmmmm...............can she really be for real?. If you remember Quale made some really stupid bizarre statements (happy campers are we?). If you track his headline catching stupidity with events at the Bush white house you start to see a pattern--every time his stupidity grabbed a headline it took the heat or the spotlight away from what was going on with GHWB. Quale was not a stupid man! Look to his work with NASA and you can see that that's a true statement! I find it hard to believe that he'd make mis-statement after mis-statement at just the right time unless it was on purpose!

Let's look at Sarah Palin--she brought life into a dying campaign--she's connecting with people in ways that McCain never could--look at the crowds she draws! She's excited the base--she's getting away with saying things that McCain never could because people think she's stupid or naive. Is she really? No way!

Her performance with Couric was a set up for the debate--as long as she was adequate she'd do fine--all she had to do was connect with the average joe that McCain was losing touch with (look at Michigan--he sure lost touch with the "average joe" there!). Now her job is to smear Obama in low ways--ways that your backwoods redneck racist conservative christain can totally identify with--but that McCain could never get away with saying outright! She's "acting" her part brilliantly!

I've always seen politicians on both sides of the aisle as duplicitious--but especially republicans--like it or not Palin could wink and gosh her way to being VP--and then she's the perfect foil to McCain's foibles while in office--all she has to do is be backwoodsy in some foreign land and all eyes will be on her instead of on him slamming his fist down on the button...................

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I can easily see why Paglia and Palin are birds of a feather
Posted by: Zenobia on Oct 9, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paglia--I am stretching back to my undergrad days, early 90s, but if I recall correctly:

Paglia said "there's no such thing as date rape." Palin refuses to pay for rape survivors' forensics kits.

Paglia likes mini skirts as "power," Palin likes to flash leg to get men to vote for her.

Paglia pushed the "pro-sex"/"sex is power" agenda that has turned American women into mere products for male consumption and has been taken so far as to result in padded bras and pole dance kits being marketed to 6-year-olds. By the height of the Iraq War, no matter what else women did or how smart we were, the DEFINITION of "female" in our culture was SEX OBJECT, undoing 40 years of hard work by equality-based feminists. Palin's being able to be taken seriously AT ALL is a result of this ideology. Palin could do ADS for ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH, wearing one of their shirts that says, "Who needs brains when you've got these?" scrawled across the boobs. Palin and her persona are the logical culmination of the "sex is power"--only if you are a woman, of course--mantra of this generation of “Sex and the City” pseudo-feminists.

--which I also call "Free Market Faux Feminists." This sort of "feminism," as I have been writing for 6 years, is very RIGHT WING. It's all about ME ME ME, my SELF-empowerment. It's all about mass consumerism to make one's self more "desirable to men," from lipstick to boob jobs. It's all about POWER OVER, a subset of militarism. It is a brand of "feminism" that gained massive popularity during a major right wing era, and an era of extreme backlash against equality for women. Dah--small wonder. This was also an era of pushing “gender difference,” male and female binaries, as loved by the Christian Right and the Third Reich. You know--binary thinking like, “You are either with us, or with the terrorists.” “There is good, and there is evil.”

Both Paglia and Palin practice this sort of right-wing "feminism." Palin is so "self-empowered" she can power-over a moose or an Iranian. So "secure in her power" she can "reclaim" "girly," winks and all, and "still be taken seriously" (by her base). Palin can exploit herself in swimsuit competitions because it is "her choice" in order to get a scholarship.

Likewise, Paglia is happy to flash leg to sell sell sell her books: It's not The System telling me I must, my internalized prescribed gender role under capitalism, no, no, no! I LOVE that I CAN’T sell my ideas without using my sexuality as defined by Madison Avenue! It's "EMPOWERMENT!" I love having to use my womanly wiles to sell shit, even my own shit! Paglia can preach her working class Italian crap all she wants, but she is 100% capitalist poster woman, showing you can sell any bullshit snake oil with a little cleavage.

Palin and Paglia are very much cut from the same capitalist, free-market faux feminist cloth. The only difference I see in their expression of "feminism" is that Palin is against abortion and against sex EDUCATION. I am not sure you can say she is anti-sex; she has a big brood! She is having lots of sex! And she seems to enjoy flaunting her sexuality to win friends and influence people, since she sure as hell can't do it with her intellect.

My biggest hope for this election is that Obama wins it. But my second biggest hope is that the Free Market, "Sex is Power," Archie Bunker (“goyles were goyles and men were men/Mr. we could use a man like Herbeht Hoover a-gaaaaaain) Faux Feminists finally REALIZE that their perspective is that of FREE MARKET, LIBERTARIAN, SEXUALITY COMMODIFYING/EXPLOITING, POWER-*OVER*, HYPER CAPITALISM. Palin is the logical culmination of their very ANTI-FEMINIST, shallow, uncritical, "Sex and the City"---bull pucky, you betcha!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Zenobia... Posted by: Genevieve
Gibberish As Performance Art
Posted by: CatRambo on Oct 10, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've got to admit that the thought of a VP candidate who is a performance artist, spewing gibberish in an attempt to deconstruct the political process is kind of awesome. I wish that were truly the case. Unfortunately, we all seem to be living in a bad parody of a Phillip K. Dick novel lately.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Camille who?
Posted by: crucigrama on Oct 10, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had, happily, forgotten all about Camille Paglia. Why did you have to resurrect her? Who gives a flying fig what she thinks or says?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Camille who? Posted by: realmuzik