Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Palin Used Exxon, Oil Industry-Funded Scientists for Global Warming Study

Posted by Tara Lohan, AlterNet at 4:28 PM on October 1, 2008.


No wonder her science is a little fuzzy.
pbear
bear

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

As we've published before, Sarah Palin is not exactly on board with the rest of the world when it comes to the basic science behind global warming. It turns out that might be because she's getting her numbers from a rather shady source.

The London Guardian published a story today about how the Alaskan governor came to the conclusion that global warming did not pose a threat to polar bears. Apparently, she relied heavily on global warming deniers funded by Exxon Mobil and other oil insiders for a study by the Alaskan state government.

As the article says:

Her own Alaskan review of the science drew on a joint paper by seven authors, four of whom were well-known climate- change contrarians. Her paper argued that it was "certainly premature, if not impossible" to link temperature rise in Alaska with human CO2 emissions.
I guess she must have missed the world's leading scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change coming to a consensus on that one already.

Why is this a big deal? From the Guardian again:
The status of the polar bear has become a battleground in the debate on global warming. In May the US department of the interior rejected Palin's objections and listed the bear as a threatened species, saying that two-thirds of the world's polar bears were likely to be extinct by 2050 due to the rapid melting of the sea ice. Palin, governor of Alaska and the Republican nominee for US vice-president, responded last month by suing the federal government, to try to overturn the ruling. The case will be heard in January.
What's at stake of course is money. Oil money, that is.
In its lawsuit, Alaska said it opposed the endangered label partly because the listing would "deter activities such as ... oil and gas exploration and development." Oil companies recently bid $2.7bn (£1.5bn) for rights to explore the Chuckchi sea, an established polar bear habitat.
Here's to hoping that Gwen Ifill asks Palin about this one in Thursday's debate.

Digg!

Tagged as: global warming, election08, climate change, polar bears, sarah palin

Tara Lohan is a managing editor at AlterNet.


Breast Flaunting for Jesus
The life of a failed California beauty pageant contestant gets even weirder.
Post by Thers. November 11, 2009.
Dobbs to Quit CNN
Dobbs, under fire, to seek greener pastures.
Post by Staff. November 11, 2009.
Under Pressure From Tea Party Activists, Charleston GOP Censures Lindsey Graham For Bipartisanship
Part of the fury from the right against Graham is being spurred by the oil and coal industry.
Post by Lee Fang. November 11, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
margo
Posted by: jbro434 on Oct 1, 2008 10:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The next time one of your right wing friends or family members sends you an article on why global warming is a hoax, how organic foods are unsafe or not as healthy,why DDT is the answer to malaria,etc. Go to the website www.sourcewatch.org and check out the background info on the author. It is fun to debunk a story that they send you when you can point out what organization or think tank the authors of the "research" is a member of and where they get the funding. Now my brother only sends me funny photos of water skiing goats and cars in swimming pools rather than those "scientific" fact articles that he used to email me every week. This woman needs to stand up and tell the world "Thanks but no thanks. I now realize I am not and never will be qualified to hold an office greater than County Clerk."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: margo Posted by: launcher