Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Michael Moore: Congratulations, We Stopped the 'Inevitable' Bailout for the Rich

Posted by Michael Moore, MichaelMoore.com at 11:13 AM on September 30, 2008.


This is rare and historic; few can remember a time when a bill supported by the president and the leadership of both parties went down in defeat.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Friends,

Everyone said the bill would pass. The masters of the universe were already making celebratory dinner reservations at Manhattan's finest restaurants. Personal shoppers in Dallas and Atlanta were dispatched to do the early Christmas gifting. Mad Men of Chicago and Miami were popping corks and toasting each other long before the morning latte run.

But what they didn't know was that hundreds of thousands of Americans woke up yesterday morning and decided it was time for revolt. The politicians never saw it coming. Millions of phone calls and emails hit Congress so hard it was as if Marshall Dillon, Elliot Ness and Dog the Bounty Hunter had descended on D.C. to stop the looting and arrest the thieves.

The Corporate Crime of the Century was halted by a vote of 228 to 205. It was rare and historic; no one could remember a time when a bill supported by the president and the leadership of both parties went down in defeat. That just never happens.

A lot of people are wondering why the right wing of the Republican Party joined with the left wing of the Democratic Party in voting down the thievery. Forty percent of Democrats and two-thirds of Republicans voted against the bill.

Here's what happened:

The presidential race may still be close in the polls, but the Congressional races are pointing toward a landslide for the Democrats. Few dispute the prediction that the Republicans are in for a whoopin' on November 4th. Up to 30 Republican House seats could be lost in what would be a stunning repudiation of their agenda.

The Republican reps are so scared of losing their seats, when this "financial crisis" reared its head two weeks ago, they realized they had just been handed their one and only chance to separate themselves from Bush before the election, while doing something that would make them look like they were on the side of "the people."

Watching C-Span yesterday morning was one of the best comedy shows I'd seen in ages. There they were, one Republican after another who had backed the war and sunk the country into record debt, who had voted to kill every regulation that would have kept Wall Street in check -- there they were, now crying foul and standing up for the little guy! One after another, they stood at the microphone on the House floor and threw Bush under the bus, under the train (even though they had voted to kill off our nation's trains, too), heck, they would've thrown him under the rising waters of the Lower Ninth Ward if they could've conjured up another hurricane. You know how your dog acts when sprayed by a skunk? He howls and runs around trying to shake it off, rubbing and rolling himself on every piece of your carpet, trying to get rid of the stench. That's what it looked like on the Republican side of the aisle yesterday, and it was a sight to behold.

The 95 brave Dems who broke with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd were the real heroes, just like those few who stood up and voted against the war in October of 2002. Watch the remarks from yesterday of Reps. Marcy Kaptur, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Dennis Kucinich. They spoke the truth.

The Dems who voted for the giveaway did so mostly because they were scared by the threats of Wall Street, that if the rich didn't get their handout, the market would go nuts and then it's bye-bye stock-based pension and retirement funds.

And guess what? That's exactly what Wall Street did! The largest, single-day drop in the Dow in the history of the New York Stock exchange. The news anchors last night screamed it out: Americans just lost 1.2 trillion dollars in the stock market!! It's a financial Pearl Harbor! The sky is falling! Bird flu! Killer Bees!

Of course, sane people know that nobody "lost" anything yesterday, that stocks go up and down and this too shall pass because the rich will now buy low, hold, then sell off, then buy low again.

But for now, Wall Street and its propaganda arm (the networks and media it owns) will continue to try and scare the bejesus out of you. It will be harder to get a loan. Some people will lose their jobs. A weak nation of wimps won't last long under this torture. Or will we? Is this our line in the sand?

Here's my guess: The Democratic leadership in the House secretly hoped all along that this lousy bill would go down. With Bush's proposals shredded, the Dems knew they could then write their own bill that favors the average American, not the upper 10% who were hoping for another kegger of gold.

So the ball is in the Democrats' hands. The gun from Wall Street remains at their head. Before they make their next move, let me tell you what the media kept silent about while this bill was being debated:

1. The bailout bill had NO enforcement provisions for the so-called oversight group that was going to monitor Wall Street's spending of the $700 billion;

2. It had NO penalties, fines or imprisonment for any executive who might steal any of the people's money;

3. It did NOTHING to force banks and lenders to rewrite people's mortgages to avoid foreclosures -- this bill would not have stopped ONE foreclosure!;

4. It had NO teeth anywhere in the entire piece of legislation, using words like "suggested" when referring to the government being paid back for the bailout;

5. Over 200 economists wrote to Congress and said this bill might actually WORSEN the "financial crisis" and cause even MORE of a meltdown.

Put a fork in this slab of pork. It's over. Now it is time for our side to state very clearly the laws WE want passed. I will send you my proposals later today. We've bought ourselves less than 72 hours.

Yours,

Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com


Jon Stewart Takes on Israel's Attack on Gaza
He’s braver than me, that’s for sure.
Post by Holly. January 9, 2009.
In Defense of the Sanjay Gupta Appointment
I understand the critiques launched by Paul Krugman, John Conyers and others -- but I think Gupta is an inspired choice.
Post by Jane Hamsher. January 9, 2009.
Report: Obama Prepared to Talk to Hamas
Barack Obama is reportedly planning to ditch President Bush's strategy of isolating Hamas, and will instead move to open contacts with the group.
Post by Faiz Shakir. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Spot On, The Clock Is Now Running
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 30, 2008 11:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over on CNBC (Conservative NutBall Channel), they are already spinning that the majority of Americans want the bailout and the phone calls and e-mails were from small 'fringe' group of liberals and tin-foil hat wearing right wingers. Otherwise, the disinformation campaign has begun.

Tomorrow is another day and members of Congress scared in an election year are extremely pliable. Even as we speak the lobbyists and big money contributors are twisting arms and calling in I.O.U.s.. The only way to counteract this spin is to DO IT AGAIN.

Make it clear- tell your representative that if they vote for this they are politically dead to you. No money, organization, vote or anything else. Make sure they know it is a time for choosing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's one thing McCain won't be talking about this week.
Posted by: mjinterest on Sep 30, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the mess in his own back yard. Polygamy thrives in Colorado City, Arizona (McCain's home state) where thousands of American families (10,000 people) are systematically stripped of their democratic rights and women & children are abused. John McCain hasn't lifted a finger to stop it. What qualifies McCain to be president when he can't even clean up the Taliban in his own backyard? Take a look at the trailer for the recent alarming documentary, BANKING ON HEAVEN. http://www.bankingonheaven.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Does the Fat F@#$ Have to Worry About
Posted by: EncinoM on Sep 30, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His home is paid off, he can sit back and like a pied piper lead the populist rats against Wall Street. Be damned that these actions will lead to suffering on Main Street, he's safe in his estate, far removed. And better yet he can direct a moving on the collapse and reap millions from the useful idiots he leads.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pay attention Encino Posted by: Alohajnc
» RE: Pay attention Encino Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Pay no attention to Encino Posted by: weathered
» Physician heal thyself! Posted by: Cathyc
» Useless idiot Posted by: leafsong1
Why not throw up a "mission accomplished" banner while you are at it?
Posted by: rickiey on Sep 30, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because this isn't over. As much as I hate to agree with Mr. Moore (and I do), he's right about this being the financial crime of the century.

But he's wrong about the little guy winning. So far, we've merely post-poned the ball game.

Way, WAY too many of supposedly "our own" democrat representatives voted for this bill. And now they simply want to make a little change and send it back up.

Yeah, we won this battle, but the war is long and quite frankly, Wall Street only needs one win to rape the rest of us.

Stay strong, progressives, and push your legislators, both democrat and republican. Remember, they are supposed to work for US, regardless of party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So Proud
Posted by: EJW on Sep 30, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm elated that this bill went down, who knew it could happen. My Representative, who usually votes for monied interests, did me proud and voted, even organized, against this bill. Ye-Haa

All my calls and emails were heard. Keep calling, keep writing .... send flowers, candy, anything to those who, for whatever reason, voted against this bill.

Happy happy, joy joy!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

now is the time
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Sep 30, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for americans to stand up and say NO, NO MORE THEFT !
Show us that you're not spineless idiots and take back your country's control.

But I doubt anything will change...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: now is the time Posted by: Lauren
» RE: now is the time Posted by: Junior Barns
» RE: now is the time Posted by: Lauren
» RE: now is the time Posted by: Lauren
Please calm down.
Posted by: Lauren on Sep 30, 2008 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha! I found it! Not a Bailout - A Rescue

Here's what happens if we do not get some sort of a plan through Congress. Credit dries up. This means that if you want to get a car loan or a home equity loan or a student loan for your son or your daughter, you may not be able to. If you want to get a mortgage, you will have to come up with a more substantial downpayment - 20 percent in some parts of the country - and you will have to pay more.

I don't know what her qualifications are, but mine are I was a loan officer for the financial aid office at UC Davis for about 7 or 8 years. After looking a a LOT of tax returns I took a class on real estate finance and have managed a rental house.

I think the dire warnings you state are EXACTLY THE RIGHT THING TO HAPPEN. A 20% down payment is considered standard and prudent. That some people may not be able to get loans is a GOOD thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please calm down. Posted by: CTvoter
The REPUBLICANS blocked the bailout!
Posted by: oregoncharles on Sep 30, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats in Congress, with 95 exceptions, tried their best to make it happen. What's wrong with this picture? Bizarre, huh? Something going on that doesn't really make sense, and Democrats like MM resorting to fiction to "explain" it:

"Here's my guess: The Democratic leadership in the House secretly hoped all along that this lousy bill would go down. With Bush's proposals shredded, the Dems knew they could then write their own bill that favors the average American, not the upper 10% who were hoping for another kegger of gold.

"So the ball is in the Democrats' hands. The gun from Wall Street remains at their head."

With an imagination like that, he should be writing thrillers.

The DEMOCRATS tried to screw you blue, everybody. Sound familiar?

How many betrayals does it take?

Check out the alternative at www.gp.org.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Idiot Republicans...
Posted by: sausage on Sep 30, 2008 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...did the right thing for all the wrong reasons.

Dopes said they voted against McCain, Dubya and Boehner because there are plenty of "free market" solutions. But it was all just show and tell for the folks back home.

Really, now, folks, it doesn't hurt me one bit if a few stock brokers go on unemployment and a few mortgage brokers lose their homes to foreclosure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Beginning and The End
Posted by: Godfather89 on Sep 30, 2008 2:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do not think that the people pushing for this bailout will take it hands down, their will be more political pressure on the Nay-Sayers. However, in some sense it is over. How so? Those who Paulson-Bush-Fed Trio decides who still belongs and who will go under, may hopefully spur revolution and the shattering of illusions as to who is a real friend of the elite and who has been used. Greed divides, Hate Divides... This is the beginning of the end for the elite, if we continue to say NO! If people are united and say NO again and if they let it pass than you have reason to fear revolution from the people...

These guys walk on a tight rope, one wrong move is political and economic suicide for them and their backers. I say lets push these elitists off their tight rope!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

now let's round em up
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Sep 30, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and hang them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

72 hours indeed....
Posted by: blogbooks on Sep 30, 2008 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't much time.

We could collectively scream "hell no" and prevent disaster but can we do anything more than that?

I'm not so sure.

The fact is that 85% of Americans didn't lose jack on Monday while the top 15% "lost" a small portion of their immense wealth.

The people cannot be threatened because WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE.

Screw you wall street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

as obams stumps
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Sep 30, 2008 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FOR the bail out

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would love to know . . .
Posted by: eaanders on Sep 30, 2008 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would love to know how many congress critters were voting their own Wall Street portfolio.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the alternative is?
Posted by: Hans B on Sep 30, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore, I love you and admire you, but I don't think you know what you're talking about in this case. Neither do I, for that matter, and you won't hear me say the bailout bill was fantastic, necessary, or bad. I just don't know.

What I do know is that the fat cats are not the ones risking anything. They didn't buy their houses with mortgages. If credit gets tight or nonexistent, cash will be king. Guess who has it.

What I'm really worried about is that the gap between rich and poor will grow if the credit crunch is not contained. The fact that the rich make the most money shouldn't make us forget that value is mostly contained in houses and land - owned for the most part by ordinary people. Take farmers. The era of overproduction and low prices is over, and agriculture is probably the best economic bet that can be made, but it's hard to buy in because of the nature of ownership. (Kuwait bought a share of Cargill, but you and I can't because it's not publicly traded.) Farmland is worth a lot now, and will be worth a lot more tomorrow. But farmers are still indebted. What happens when their interest rates rise steeply? A lot of them won't make it. Guess who'll be there to buy their land. Those who possess cash.

Homes, ditto. Foreclose people's homes, buy them for a pittance, then rent them back to them. Who wins? The people who have cash at hand. Meanwhile the people who lost their homes will be paying interest on their debt and a rent.

So a credit crunch/depression can easily lead to an even bigger concentration of wealth. Let's stop partying with the fallacious notion that Wall Street fat cats just lost out. Their companies did, perhaps, but not the rich guys who were wise enough to hang onto cash and other safe forms of property. They'll be picking up the pieces at rock bottom prices, and some of those pieces used to belong to people like us.

And let's not forget why the bill didn't make it. Because most Republicans were holding out for an alternative bill that would have given even more money to the rich, with no public ownership of assets whatsover. The tabled bill wasn't defeated by them because it was too unfair; it was defeated because it wasn't unfair enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And the alternative is? Posted by: CatDad
Michael Moore
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Sep 30, 2008 6:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore is Da Man! He is good at bringing the TRUTH to the spotlight, its what he does best.

Jiff
Privacy Center

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do we do next?
Posted by: Spot on Sep 30, 2008 6:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
check THIS out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cracker Jack
Posted by: Direct Democracy on Sep 30, 2008 7:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They'll slather on some candy coating, turn up the Fear Machine (tm) and cue the talking points chorus.

The important thing to understand and believe is that Wall Street, Congress, The Executive Branch, the media, AIPAC and the sprawling international right wing cabal are all working together to push through a bailout.

Hold the line.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tbpmom
Posted by: tbpmom56 on Sep 30, 2008 8:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey I was elated that the bill went down!!!
Let those rich S.O.B.'s have and stolen off myself and other common clock-punching, working class people learn to do with out like the rest of us.
No glorious welfare check for the white-collared, million-dollar bastards of Wall Street.
And to think Hanky Paulson and his good Wall Street buddies were panning it all out so well. BULL SHIT!!!!

Stop all the deregulation. Look after your fellow Americans. Be the United States of America, not the Land of Greed and Corruption......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Nonsense From Democratic Hack Moore
Posted by: jooljetkmae on Sep 30, 2008 10:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's my guess: The Democratic leadership in the House secretly hoped all along that this lousy bill would go down. With Bush's proposals shredded, the Dems knew they could then write their own bill that favors the average American, not the upper 10% who were hoping for another kegger of gold.

Here's my guess: The Democratic leadership, and the Party in general, are a bunch of shameless shills for Wall Street, and need to be punished next month for it. How else to explain 140 Dems voting for this awful legislation, and only 95 against? Leave it to a Democratic Party hack like Moore to spin such a record of shame in a positive light.

Here they had almost universal public backing to do the right thing and help join the House Republicans to vote the thing down even more overwhelmingly, and they didn't do their part. But they secretly yearn to do the right thing, as long as we keep unequivocally voting for them, no matter what they do in office, the pied piper Michael Moore tells us. They really want to write a bailout bill that helps Main Street, the working class and the poor, the pied piper Moore tells us. Well, then why the hell haven't they already done it!? Such legislation would have had no trouble passing the Congress and would help instantly change the terms of the debate on this issue. This is absolute nonsense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too Many Democrats were using Bush Tactics Too.
Posted by: weslen1 on Sep 30, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had just READ the part pertaining to executive salaries, and took particular NOTE that executives would lose NOTHING if this bill was passed. Limits on "compensation" would ONLY apply to the FUTURE, not anything that led up to this mess. So I was FURIOUS when the Democrats came out one by one touting the "caps on executive compensation" and "accountability" and "investigations" and more. ALL LIES! BUSH PLAY BOOK! EXCEPT THEY DIDN'T LEARN WELL ENOUGH. We've had enough lies and BS from Bush HIMSELF. We sure don't need to be treated like 5 year olds by the Democrats too.
If someone who'd lied to me over 900 times about war, torture, Iran, and more and now came to me with a proposal that I give one of his buddies $700 BILLION dollars with "No strings, no oversight, no investigation by any body, be they congress, law OR the courts, I would have told them to take a hike, in no uncertain terms.
Unless Bush uses this to call off the election, the power of which was given to him by the Republicans in congress, he and all his cronies will be gone in 3 months. It makes no sense to give them unlimited cash and unlimited power for a giant spending spree for those last 3 months. But that's exactly what this bill would have done and without the fat cats paying a dime out of the money they've stolen for so many YEARS.
Even if this bailout is necessary at all, I would have at least called in independent experts with NO ties to the Bush Administration to tell me if the Liar in Chief was miraculously telling the truth for once and, if so, the best way to go about fixing the problems WITHOUT the Bush Administration involved in ANY way.
It's too bad that Barack Obama has jumped on the Bush Bandwagon too. And the Democratic "leaders" holding the hearings in secret, out of the public scrutiny was all the proof I needed to tell ME it was a SCAM. They didn't want us to know they were just giving it all away. Bush/Cheney/Bernanke/Paulson and the Wall Street crowd would have a field day splitting up all that money without anyone from congress to the FBI to any court in the land being the wiser AND the FBI investigation that has been ongoing since MARCH would have come to a halt as well. ENOUGH!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would you die protecting the USA?
Posted by: drblack on Oct 1, 2008 2:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you believe in Freedom,The United States and the Constitution you will put your money where your mouth is.
Freedom is gained by people willing to die for it. All you have to do is risk money.
This is your chance to take back your country.
Do you have the courage to stand up for Freedom and America?

No bailout unless regular Americans are given help,regulations are placed on ALL financial systems(hedge funds included.)
Bankruptcy law is put back to where it was before it was changed a few years ago in favor of the credit card companies. No one should go broke getting medical attention and strict limits are placed on interest.
Foreclosures are to be stopped and loans renegotiated.
No business can be "Too Big To Fail" and those that are to be broken up.
Business must pay its taxes and NO ONE can have secret off-shore accounts.
Those who created this mess should be investigated and treated like the criminals they are. No more shielding of the rich.
There must be harsh penalties for anyone who breaks laws related to finance.

This is your chance to save the USA and restore Freedom,Justice and the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not over, round two on the way
Posted by: warrior woman on Oct 1, 2008 4:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not over, the Senate is going to vote Thursday ahead of the house on who knows what? Get your phones on and all the petitions signed that you can, cause here they come again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michael - Help Us again - Please - People - Take America Back from Corporate State!
Posted by: Lifesabeach on Oct 1, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please consider the following suggestions to help solve the economic crisis:

1. END THE WAR IN IRAQ - Use the money saved to create emergency jobs for Americans to reduce our dependence on foreign oil through green energy expansion AND secure American jobs that pay a living wage in America!

2. Improve Education through innovation - setting up a cabinet position that finds new fields of study ahead of the curve, increases apprenticeships for high school, etc.

3. ESTABLISH A TRUE LIVING WAGE SCALE- rewarding corporations for providing a living wage, full health care benefits, matching retirement funds, family/wellness/sickness leave plans with healthy tax cuts.

4. REGULATE ALL MORTGAGES - PROVIDE A FIXED RATE OF 3-4% to all Americans as an emergency stimulus package, temporarily reducing our output until income catches up to expense inflation.

5. CREATE A NEW HOMESTEAD ACT and IMPROVE HOPE for HOMEOWNER's ACT - providing homes and jobs for all American's through Ameri-Corp, cleaning up America, improving our infra-structure.

6. FREEZE FORECLOSURES - get people back in homes they have lost through #5 above.

7. CREATE REGULATORY LEGISLATION ON BOTH PROFITS AND WAGES thus allowing the American people to earn a living wage now and in the future.

8. BROKER A DEAL WITH AMERICA'S WEALTHIEST to buy out the failing Wall St. giants and let them govern it's recovery with their experience and new regulatory controls.

Thank you for listening! Now this would give McSame a reason for rushing to Washington wouldn't it?

While we're at it shouldn't we IMPEACH Bush for trying to rob the American' taxpayer during his dictatorship?

Do we need to march in the streets and shut down America - as they did in France in 1968?

Use your voice with us Michael - get us out there! Thanks for all you do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MOORE - THERE WAS NO VICTORY
Posted by: ashbaines on Oct 1, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WAIT JUST A MINUTE -- Bush and the FED pumped $630 billion into the sytem Monday morning... just before the vote. Not a peep anywhere but a Bloomberg story... like the weather.

The NEXT DAY - Bush signs a $630 billion dollar spending bill... WHAT? we are supposed to think it's the same money?

And now we are still hearing about the $700 billion bailout.

They've spent 1 TRILLION, 260 BILLION in TWO DAYS !?!?!? and they want MORE????

Why are these men still breathing? -- Where are the gallows? the pitchforks?--the Jacobins??? --

NOt a PEEP anywhere but Crooks & Liars and Bloomberg.... not a fucking peep!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's n ot over yet
Posted by: Outspokengrandmother on Oct 1, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can't relax yet. The Corporations are now bein offered tax cuts (more tax cuts) in order to ram this aberration through....We have to let those criminals in Washington know that we don't want this bill and we don't trust them and especially Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a moment to gasp for a last breath
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 1, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The shitstorm isn't going away and now that we're past or nearly past petro-peak it'll get worse. I don't trust a rich person any farther than I can spit on them.

They'll be back, and with a vengeance. This weekend was weird because I got phone calls from conservative ex-friends I haven't spoken to in decades... they smelled something we had in common even though we share that common view of no bailout for extremely and diametrically opposed reasons.

The freakfest is only begun and now it's more dangerous to the little guy because now the whackjobs'll come out of the closet and write all kinds of psycho bullshit into law on the backend.

behind every rich person is a crime... just look for it, you'll find it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We Didn't Stop A Thing; Bailout Will Happen
Posted by: cherylholmes on Oct 1, 2008 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We didn't stop a thing..this was all posturing and a ploy to get us sufficiently riled up so the govt can put those troops on us Oct 1st. We have become a police state. This debacle facillitated the transformation.

I've read more guns have been purchased in the last 10 days than in anytime in history...people appear to be arming themselves for phase 2.

MSNBC reported yesterday the government has already borrowed the money to pay for the bailouts and that 2 foreign banks are the first to be bailed out.

I hope everyone, especially the Rethugs enjoy their new found poverty status and and enjoys being totally screwed in the ass like we all are now. I'm sure Blackwater is also on standby..get ready amerikkka...change is coming sooner than you think...

[