Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

If CNN Reported the Basic Facts, McCain's Craziness Would Be Obvious to All

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 12:55 PM on July 15, 2008.


John McCain couldn't restart the Cold War if he tried ... and apparently he will try.
ussrmap
ussr

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

A note. They gave me the keys to the blog again. I don't know what they're thinking -- clearly, I'm just gonna make trouble. Anyway, check in frequently over the next few weeks; should be a fun ride. And if you're going to be in Austin for Netroots Nation, make sure you catch the immigration panel I'm moderating on Friday, and then be sure to swing by the happy-hour party we're throwing on Saturday. You can meet Atrios and Jim Hightower! Did I mention that the margaritas will be on AlterNet (and various co-sponsors)? It’s our way of giving (alcohol) back to the community and all that.

*****

So, CNN's Situation Room was on while I tried to burn some blubber at the gym the other day. Worked off 400 calories, and I think Wolf Blitzer knocked about five points off my IQ in the process.

The subject: McCain and Obama on foreign policy -- or FoPo, as we FoPo nerds like to call it.

One of the policies they touched on was McCain's proposal to kick Russia out of the G8. Blitzer had Very Serious Foreign Policy Analystâ„¢ Fareed Zakaria on. Here's their exchange:

BLITZER: Let's get your analysis right now, what we just heard. Because as far as John McCain is concerned, we're hearing a very different stance from Barack Obama as far as Russia and its involvement in the G-8 alignment.

ZAKARIA: I think they're two very different visions of how to deal with the world, Wolf. I think on the one hand, you have McCain, who is suggesting, in a sense, a new division, a new Cold War, if you will, between the democracies and the autocracies.

What Obama said to me was, look, you can't solve the world's problems that way, we have got to deal with the issues of global warming, issues of nuclear proliferation. On nuclear proliferation, on loose nukes, you need the Russians. On any economic issue, you need the Chinese. So it's a vision of drawing in the world's major powers, whether or not they're democracies, which is a kind of more ideological view, you know, which is sort of democracy versus the rest.

BLITZER: So basically the major difference between Barack Obama and John McCain is, McCain wants to expel Russia from the G-8 and Barack Obama says keep them in, keep them in this tent, because the U.S. needs them.

ZAKARIA: Exactly. Draw these guys into the tent so we can solve some of the world's common problems together.

So, to recap, the "best political team on television" -- they're humble, too -- told me that McCain never got the memo that the Cold War is over, and Obama wants to keep the Russkies in the tent, whatever that means.

Here's what they failed to tell me, and the millions who rely on the pabulum broadcast by CNN for their political information:

The G8 is an organization that functions on a consensus basis. Therefore, Russia itself would have to vote 'yea' to any plan to boot Russia out of the group. Therefore, McCain's proposal is batshit insane, and Obama's feelings about the matter are irrelevant. But Blitzer and Zakaria couldn't bring themselves to mention that simple fact, so many viewers were left with the impression that this is a less-than-batshit-insane proposal, one worthy of cable TV airtime.

I have no idea how we got such an incompetent media, but it's clear that I have to start watching cable news again. The blog fodder is just endless.

I'll keep a look-out for McCain's proposal to boot China off the UN Security Council.

*****

I know we shouldn't chide McCain for his age -- that's uncouth -- but, seriously, he does seem to be seriously out-of-touch with the modern world. Steve Benen caught this one:

At a press conference in Phoenix today ... McCain referenced Czechoslovakia. Again:

"I was concerned about a couple of steps that the Russian government took in the last several days. One was reducing the energy supplies to Czechoslovakia. Apparently that is in reaction to the Czech's agreement with us concerning missile defense, and again some of the Russian now announcement they are now retargeting new targets, something they abandoned at the end of the Cold War, is also a concern. So we see the tensions between Russia and their neighbors, as well as Russia and the United States are somewhat increasing."

[...]

Russia can't "reduce energy supplies to Czechoslovakia." Czechoslovakia, of course, doesn't exist. It split into two countries more than 15 years ago. McCain has actually been to the Czech Republic and Slovakia since they became independent countries, and he's met with their leaders.

So, McCain slipped up. He's 71 and this is going to happen from time to time, right? Well, there's a little more to it than that.

First, as Greg Sargent noted, McCain has made this same mistake more than once during the campaign. About three months ago, McCain vowed to "work closely with Czechoslovakia" on missile defense. Last fall, during a Republican debate, McCain said: "The first thing I would do is make sure that we have a missile defense system in place in Czechoslovakia and Poland, and I don't care what his objections are to it."

Second, before Republicans condemn Dems for being picky on this, let's not forget that in the 2000 campaign, when McCain also screwed up Czechoslovakia, it was none other than George W. Bush who said it deserved to be a campaign issue: "A guy gets up and quizzes me [on world leaders] ... but John McCain says something about the 'ambassador to Czechoslovakia.' Well, I know there is no Czechoslovakia [there's a Czech Republic and a Slovakia], but yet it didn't make the nightly national news."

AlterNet is a non profit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by our writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, cnn, mccain, g8

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.


Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Well duh
Posted by: FairnessDoctrine on Jul 15, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see, Blitzer is AIPAC and Time Warner is still trying to figure out how to hide and spend the $2B bribe the government gave them, so what else do you expect?

Even from the "most trusted name in news". God, I long for the days of John Holliman and Bernard Shaw and so on. Back when there was integrity and truth.

CNN is nothing but a bad alternative to Entertainment Tonight, which is pretty hideous in and of itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well duh Posted by: desidid
» RE: Well duh Posted by: Lauren
Races Need Hype
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 15, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MSM can't tell the whole story because it wouldn't be a race if they did; if there isn't a race, they don't get viewers; if they don't get viewers, they don't sell advertising; if they don't sell advertising, they don't make any money...So the wheel goes round and round, and we end up with inane 'discussions' and juicy topics that are meant to draw in viewers -but have NO bearing on the candidates actual positions.
...If they did talk about the candidates & their positions, they wouldn't have a race to sell; It's in the MSM's interests to make sure the race stays as close as possible, and may the truth be damned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: aces Need Hype Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Pagans? Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: aces Need Hype Posted by: oregoncharles
ON THE SUBJECT OF TENTS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 15, 2008 2:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harry Truman said it best also referring to the Russians. He met with Joseph Stalin in an effort to befriend him and people asked him why. He said, "Because it's better to have him inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in". It still makes sense. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ON THE SUBJECT OF TENTS Posted by: billgee
» RE: ON THE SUBJECT OF TENTS Posted by: surfreality
Thanks for the blog J.H.
Posted by: bookie on Jul 15, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing I'm hearing lately that really irks me about McCain is people talking about his military service. I'm sick of hearing that he's a hero and a patriot. His service record doesn't mean shit for running a country. And a large number of people are buying into the rethug notion that McCain's military service was stellar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thanks for the blog J.H. Posted by: the man with a dog
» RE: Thanks for the blog J.H. Posted by: Quannah
Great to see you back on Peek Josh....
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale on Jul 15, 2008 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, please be careful. Remember the anti-drug ads from the '80's?
I have no idea how we got such an incompetent media, but it's clear that I have to start watching cable news again.
Red alert.
VIDEO: Egg being fried in pan.
VOICEOVER: "This is your brain on MSM".
Don't let too much cable news viewing turn your brain to mush! Maybe Hazen should think about testing you for cognitive dissonance every month or so.
Today's blog had me LMAO.

The MSM is letting McClone slide just the way they did Bush. And the same mindless, unquestioning percentage of the population will vote for him too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Even worse... Posted by: Ethical1
Age
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jul 15, 2008 10:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm ten years younger than McCain, which is old enough to know that it does matter.

For instance, although I remember the split in Czechoslovakia, I might still refer to the former name out of sheer habit. On the other hand, I'd correct myself. McCain apparently isn't doing that, which is fairly serious, but not as serious as thinking Russia can be expelled from the G8. He sounds a lot like W, who didn't have his excuse.

From long observation: Presidents age very rapidly. Compare pictures of W before and lately. McCain wouldn't survive, which means his choice of VP is especially important - if he had the slightest hope of becoming President.

His age will also matter a great deal in the campaign. I doubt very much that many people will vote for a feeble old man, which he obviously is in every video feed.

He's a sacrificial lamb: the Repubs know they aren't electing anybody this year, they don't even want to, so they let poor old John have the nomination. It's a consolation prize: he tried so hard!

So don't worry too much about pointing out his age, Joshua. It matters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

democratic nations? what democratic nations?
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Jul 15, 2008 11:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now wait a second there, McCain!
how can we have a cold war between democracies and autocracies when there arent even any democracies around? surely you dont mean AMERICA, the so-called "republic" whose flag we used to pledge our allegiance to?

of course if it was even a republic, wouldnt the government have to represent the wishes of the people? that sure as sh*t isnt happening, what with the neo-liberal fascist globalist takeover in both the white house and congress.
(both sides of the aisle, by the way: think pelosi, clinton, gore, obama...)

hey, isnt that why thomas jefferson said we should have a revolution every 10 years? he knew that we would find ourselves in exactly the position we are in today, and he told us how to deal with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]