Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Shifting the Blame in Gender-Motivated Violence

Posted by Lucinda Marshall, Feminist Peace Network at 8:02 AM on May 7, 2008.


How the media's use of the passive voice skews coverage of violence against women.
violenceagainstwomen

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

Anna Greer has a very thought-provoking piece in Wo! Magazine about the use of the passive voice in describing gender-based violence. She writes:

“One of the first things journalism students learn is to avoid the passive voice. So, you have to wonder why journalists are drawn to using passive voice when the subject of their article is male violence against women. What classically happens is that the actors in these stories are sidelined and we’re left with the women who get raped, sexually harassed, or beaten.”

“A recent story in the Sydney Morning Herald was a perfect example of passive voice subverting the object/subject relationship. ‘Don’t Want to Be Harassed? Stop Acting Like a Man’ read the headline. The article reported on a Canadian study which found that, in the workplace, men were more likely to sexually harass women who didn’t conform to traditional gender roles. In the process, it used passive voice to shift blame from the perpetrators of sexual harassment and placed it squarely on the shoulders of the victims.”

“The use of passive voice in articles such as this, subconsciously shapes the way people view violence against women. It is an insidious and unquestioned practice. In the passive voice version of the above story, men apparently don’t harass and intimidate women, women just run around getting themselves harassed. If active voice had been used, would the same conclusions be drawn? Would it have the same headline? No.”

“This is not merely an isolated incident or slip of the sub-editor’s metaphorical knife. It is a wide-spread practice - in news articles on the subject of rape, sexual assault, sexual harassment and domestic violence - to have the perpetrators painted out of the picture, either partly or completely.

Positioning a male abuser as the actor in a news article on sexual assault isn’t accusing all men of being abusers, just as identifying women as victims doesn’t imply that all women have suffered from sexual harassment or intimidation in the workplace. But let’s be real here. Men are the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of violence against women — as they are the overwhelming majority of perpetrators of violence against men, for that matter. And using the passive voice in articles on gendered violence positions female victims as somehow the root of the problem. It shifts the responsibility and blame from the actor to the person on the receiving end of the abuse.”

“When women are identified as the victims of gender-motivated violence and intimidation, the perpetrators must be identified as the actors. The use of passive voice cloaks this reality. Let’s place the blame where it belongs — squarely on the shoulders of the abusers.”

Kudos to Greer for totally nailing it. We cannot hope to end gendered violence until we accurately report and name what is happening and like UK activist Jennifer Drew, Greer is absolutely right that we have to place the blame on the perpetrators, not the victims.

Digg!

Tagged as: women, violence, gender, media


Fox News: 'McCain's TV Commercials Contain ... Out-Right Lies'
Wait, we're seriously talking about Fox News? The Fox News?
Post by Steve Benen. September 5, 2008.
Van Halen, Heart, Others to GOP: Stop Using Our Songs!
GOP ignores copyrights, raises ire of multiple recording artists.
Post by Dave Burdick. September 5, 2008.
Jon Stewart Thrashes Rove, O'Reilly For Palin Hypocrisy
How do you spell 'double standard?'
Post by Staff. September 4, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unfortunately...
Posted by: carolcarre on May 8, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the passive voice is used a lot in journalism. Cars have accidents. People get hit by cars. People are assaulted. I don't think it is just gendered, it is part and parcel of the loss of the ability to understand relationships between actor and acted upon. Vehicles don't drive themselves. People don't run around getting assaulted. Women don't run around getting raped.

I think that sloppy thinking is the bane of our society and most particularly of journalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Violence in epidemic proportions
Posted by: Babygoat on May 8, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has been a stance of the patriarchal socities for a very long time. All of the major religions and many of the lesser religions as well use "control" tatics to keep women subjective. The Stockholm Syndrom teachs the victim to be sympathic to the abuser. Sexism and violence are societal norms and were effective for too long a time. One of the more diffecult concepts men have had to realize-to be taught is that WOMEN ARE PEOPLE.
When Dr. Martin Luther King marched in support of the strike of Sanitation Workers they wore signs around their necks "I AM A MAN"...Maybe this is a bit off the main subject however, until women and children become "valued" and full participants in society , we are left to the old ways of violence-rape-harassment-discrimination and not allowed to learn (be educated) and/or full participants in a society that desparately needs, has to change! War is not the only way to survive, actually at the rate of violence in epidemic proportions that we are in now, has escalated "all" of us nearer to oblivian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

other things to consider
Posted by: eddiehuff on May 8, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I generally agree with carolcarre's comment, and part of the problem here is simply lazy writing on the part of journalists, I think. But I believe the writer of this piece is imagining sinister motives. There are a couple of reasons reporters use the passive voice when writing about sexual assaults, I think. One, they have to be careful about libel issues. When a man is merely a suspect in a crime and hasn't been convicted, a reporter can't write, "He raped her." Two, the issue of protecting the identity of sexual-assault victims also makes for some convoluted writing. If a reporter could simply write "John Smith raped Jane Doe," I suspect he or she would. But the rules of the game make it more complicated than that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rules of the game! Posted by: henderson
I AM A MAN!
Posted by: Andrew_S on May 14, 2008 10:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not a perpertrator or an abuser, so take this shit rolls down hill philosophy, and stick to abusing kids and animals. Just west of this continent is another, and it's HQ is somewhere in DC, I suggest you consult with your masters on how to promulgate orwellian speake a little better, I don't buy it. If someone paid this persons wage, I would reconsider getting someone a little more subtle and more party orientated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]