Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Geraldine Ferraro Defends Her Racist Remarks on Obama

Posted by Adam Howard, AlterNet at 2:13 PM on March 11, 2008.


Samantha Power quit. Guess who won't.
Ferraro on FOX News

EDITOR's NOTE: This blog features several posts covering the ongoing controversy surrounding racially insensitive remarks made by Hillary Clinton supporter and fundraiser, former Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro.

****

Chris Bowers @ Open Left:

This is sad:

"Any time anybody does anything that in any way pulls this campaign down and says let's address reality and the problems we're facing in this world, you're accused of being racist, so you have to shut up," Ferraro said. "Racism works in two different directions. I really think they're attacking me because I'm white. How's that?"

At what point, exactly, did Geraldine Ferraro become a Reagan Democrat? when you lose to Republicans that badly, Do you get turned into one in some sort of Borg-like fashion?

Mainly, this response depresses me, since it comes from someone who is otherwise known as a trailblazer fighting the good fight at a time when it was unpopular to do so. I don't want to think of Geraldine Ferraro this way, but this response is crazy.

I guess that Ferraro thinks, as Marc Ambinder wrote, that "running as a black guy named Barack Hussein Obama is soooo easy." Or perhpas she thinks that the only reason Obama is winning the campaign is because so many African-Americans are voting for him. Even if that is true, doesn't it occur to Ferraro that one of the main reasons African-Americans are voting overwhelmingly for Obama is because of statements like this from Clinton surrogates? Here is some love from Ferraro from Jack and Jill politics:

So, being Black is now a CONCEPT.
A CONCEPT, People.
Well, she can CONCEPT this.

Kiss.My.Lucky.Black.Ass.

This is pretty depressing, but it makes me feel even stronger about my Reagan Dem post from Friday, and the implications it has for the campaign. And Ferraro's inability to win Reagan Democrats despite statements like this is a perfect case in point of my central thesis.

****

Paddy @ Cliff Schecter's Blog:

Last night I posted this. Now Barack Obama's campaign responds:

A senior adviser to Barack Obama's presidential campaign called on Hillary Clinton to "repudiate" a comment by one of her top fundraisers that Barack Obama would not be a major presidential contender if he were not black.

"I think if Sen. Clinton is serious about putting an end to statements that have racial implications," Susan Rice, an Obama foreign policy adviser, told MSNBC Tuesday, "...then she ought to repudiate this comment."

Indeed she should.

Ferraro, a member of Clinton's finance committee and a top fundraiser, said the New York senator had suffered because the press "has been uniquely hard on her. It's been a very sexist media. Some just don't like her. The others have gotten caught up in the Obama campaign."

"I was reading an article that said young Republicans are out there campaigning for Obama because they believe he's going to be able to put an end to partisanship," she added. "Dear God! Anyone that has worked in the Congress knows that for over 200 years this country has had partisanship - that's the way our country is."

Ferraro could not be reached for comment, but Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson has said the campaign disagrees with her remarks.

Samantha Power quit. Guess who won't.

****

UPDATE: Hillary Just Lost Every Black Vote (by Trish @ Pensito Review)

At least I would hope so. This is outrageous.

In an interview with ABC News affiliate WHTM, Clinton, D-N.Y. ignored calls from the Obama campaign to remove Ferraro from her campaign, saying, “Well, I don’t agree with that and I think it’s important that we try to stay focused on issues that matter to the American people.”
In a relatively mild response, Clinton continued, “And both of us have had supporters and staff members who’ve gone over the line and we have to reign them in and try to keep this on the issues. There are big differences between us on the issues — let’s stay focused on that.”

You wish. Let’s take a moment and recall what Geraldine said.

“If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position,” Ferraro told a local California newspaper last week.
“And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept,” Ferraro said…
Ferraro’s comments appeared to highlight her frustration with Obama’s campaign. The Illinois senator is leading Clinton in popular support and pledged delegates, according to ABC News’ delegate scorecard.

But wait. Let’s also remember what happened just last week when an Obama aide called Hillary a monster.

“Last Monday, I made inexcusable remarks that are at marked variance from my oft-stated admiration for Senator Clinton and from the spirit, tenor and purpose of the Obama campaign. And I extend my deepest apologies to Senator Clinton, Senator Obama and the remarkable team I have worked with over these long 14 months.”

Power’s statement came scarcely an hour after congressional supporters of Clinton demanded that Obama fire Power for the remarks.
In a conference call organized by the Clinton campaign, Democratic Reps. Nita Lowey and Gregory Meeks of New York, and Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, decried the remarks made in The Scotsman by Power, 37, a Pulitzer-Prize winning professor at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at Harvard University.
“This is an important test for Senator Obama, ” said Lowey. “It’s really a test of character ... You really wonder how Sen. Obama can have a person like that, as bright as she might be, advising his campaign.”

Yeah, you wonder. You wonder how Hillary Clinton became such a driven asshole.

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!

Tagged as: samantha power, clinton, obama, race, racism, ferraro

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.


Jon Stewart Thrashes Rove, O'Reilly For Palin Hypocrisy
How do you spell 'double standard?'
Post by Staff. September 4, 2008.
Scarborough, Buchanan Completely Reverse Positions On Palin In Just Five Days
Yesterday Scarborough and Buchanan sang a different tune about Palin then they were while waiting McCain's VP announcement on Friday.
Post by Ali. September 4, 2008.
Rachel Maddow: 'I Have Never Watched More Than Three Consecutive Minutes of Fox News Ever.'
Ain't she great?
Post by Faiz Shakir. September 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fair Play
Posted by: OldRedleg on Mar 11, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose one could logically and fairly ask in counterpoint if Hillary Clinton would be a major presidential contender if she were not a woman and her family name was not overwhelmingly associated with DLC political insiders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fair Play Posted by: OldRedleg
» RE: Fair Play Posted by: Vik
Hillary is a Monster?
Posted by: foreverhope on Mar 11, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary is a Monster?

Get with what is important! Get with the Program! Hillary is the VICTIM of an ATTACK by that mean ole Obama that my be a Muslim, as far as she knows or doesn't know at least she hasn't heard otherwise.... A mean black Muslim man is attacking a poor defenseless white woman here. Justice must be served before...
Its all too disgusting to think about.

Enough is enough.

Super Delegates-Get Up Sack Up and Kick the Traitor Hillary Clinton out of the party and kick her degenerate husband out too.

PHONE THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, ASK FOR HOWARD DEAN:

1-202-479-5100


Yes, Hillary is worst than a monster, she is a vampire who wants to suck Obama's blood.

I would rather loose with an honorable Obama than win with a Traitorous McClinton.
Enough is enough. Set some standards of decency. Stand up to the Clinton slime machine. Get a grip and make a stand.

"Racism is man's gravest threat to man - the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason.

~Abraham Joshua Heschel~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hillary is a Monster? Posted by: drmflorida
» really sorry Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: really sorry Posted by: wagadog
» RE: really sorry Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Hope, Honey! Posted by: Longdream
» Longdream Honey! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: really sorry Posted by: rinpochet
» But PLEASE do Posted by: Aimleft
» RE: But PLEASE do Posted by: andrushka
» RE: But PLEASE do Posted by: Lauren
» RE: really sorry Posted by: Lauren
Maven
Posted by: maven on Mar 11, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am 58, old enough to be totally engaged in the second wave of feminism and eligible and did vote for Geraldine Ferraro and the other guy. I am also a Chicagoan (home of some well known sleazy politics) who has lived in Arkansas for 30+yrs, clearly during Bill and Hill running AR as well as the White House. With all that, I have to say that it breaks my little feminist heart not to be able to support the first viable woman candidate, because I do know her and I do not agree with her and Bill's sellout to corporate interests and politicking. I had wanted to believe, but NAFTA, the welfare bill and so much more ended that. I am done with Clintons.

There is NO Doubt that sexism is playing into the treatment and coverage of Hillary and that saddens me greatly. It was also ironic, that at first with all my alternative choices, I was rooting for the white guy, John Edwards, who did seem to have to me the most progressive message. But now Barack is my first choice, as the only best hope for fresh air in Federal govt. I wish I could be a strong supporter of Hillary, but I feel like I know better. I am ready for the Bush and Clinton dynasties to ride off into the sunset. And I do not believe that it betrays any of my core feminist beliefs to say that. As a matter of fact, it supports the whole idea of equal treatment for every one that I can look at a woman candidate, and say not good enough. Not that she is not twice as good as the male choice, just not as good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maven Posted by: g50
» RE: Maven Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Maven Posted by: noir
im loving this
Posted by: Joe on Mar 11, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
another person exposed their true thoughts. clinton, rendell, ferraro. of course since all these people are of a certain political stipe they probably assumed they were making highly intelligent point that only thinking and intelligent people like themselves would notice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well
Posted by: g50 on Mar 11, 2008 1:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Turnabout may be fair play. I thought at the time, "but Hillary IS a monster," which I think is true, but I guess you shouldn't say it, and stick to the issues.

Of course, this Ferraro remark is pretty low. I used to have a lot of respect for her, but this is straight up racist BS. Maybe more subtle than what you get from the right but very representative of a certain kind of privilege.

For example, that Tina Brown article. She talked about "invisible" women over 50. All right, I know the sentiment. But frankly, her examples were the director of an oceanographic research team, the owner of a technology development company, and the owner of a yoga studio. Sorry, but that doesn't seem invisible to me - sounds like the kind of person I would listen to. Sounds like the kind of person who has worked hard and succeeded and is so heralded in America.

You want invisible? The invisible man? Black men, and latinos, are pretty damned invisible throughout society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well Posted by: Lauren
GERALDINE SHOULD JUST GET OUT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 11, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She hasn't had any attention in years. This is not the way to get it. The stakes are high, Mrs. Ferraro. Just shut up and go home. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tit for Tat
Posted by: kite38 on Mar 11, 2008 4:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Samantha Power respectfully apologized and resigned after making her inappropriate comment.

Sigh...another double standard for "Queen Hillary".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more 3 a.m. dreaming...
Posted by: noir on Mar 11, 2008 4:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was 3 a.m. and as I fumbled for the phone I knew, with a sinking feeling, that I was Barack Obama, and the only reason it was me answering that phone call was my race....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: more 3 a.m. dreaming... Posted by: wagadog
» Subliminal message? Posted by: rinpochet
"Yeah, you wonder."
Posted by: g50 on Mar 11, 2008 5:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Yeah, you wonder. You wonder how Hillary Clinton became such a driven asshole."

I really think she may be an evil person. I am seriously concerned about whether or not she would sell her soul to be president? Because she seems to have sold everything else she could have.

This is really so sad. Hillary was once someone who I really admired. I thought she was such a bad ass, even when she made some decisions I didn't agree with.

Now I think - was I duped by this all along? I guess I can say I was young & didn't know any better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Black? White?
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Mar 11, 2008 5:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
maybe people are voting for obama because none of these other fucks have ever done anything for anybody as far as they can see. I'm going to vote for obama because hilary has proved what an insider she is and a corporate hack to boot. Just like that loser in the white house, if she can't win fair and square she will do anything, no matter how disgusting and irrelevent to win. that is the perfect definition of a loser

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has the Clinton campaign decided to sacrifice the Black vote
Posted by: xconservative on Mar 11, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in order to gain more white votes? When this race started, Clinton and Obama were pretty much splitting the Black vote in the polls. After Bill cut loose in South Carolina, Obama started winning about 80% of the Black vote. Now, after Ferraro's remarks, he's getting about 90% in Mississippi. But Clinton picked up more white voters than usual in Ohio, and whites in MS are voting for her almost 3 to 1.

Did the Clinton people look at the numbers and decide there are more whites than blacks, and deliberately decide to try to drive a wedge between the races to increase her chances of winning? I would hope she is not that Machiavellian, but I'm beginning to wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Transparent
Posted by: Fishbone Soldier on Mar 11, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think what xconservative indicates above is transparently clear. There are only two ways to read this:

1) Ferraro is a racist and an imbecile. She believes her comments and truly thinks that if Obama were white, he would have been voted out of the campaign long ago.

2) This is a calculated strategy on the Clintons' part - the ultimate kitchen sink strategy to turn white people away from Obama's campaign. They would like nothing more than African Americans picketing in the streets, and they are hoping for black outrage here. Senator Clinton's lack of action or response speaks loudly and clearly.

I'm going with a little from column A and a little from column B. She equates Obama's rise to hers, yet her position as VP candidate was picked by Mondale, or a party, or whatever. Obama has earned everything he's gained, so she's at least a bit of an imbecile.

I'm just really appalled. This is sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, sad, and pathetic. Hillary Clinton is an embarrassment to the year 2008. I just hope it blows up in their faces. I have to think that most white Democrats won't tolerate this.

Fight the Youth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Transparent Posted by: gjohloc@hotmail.com
» RE: Transparent Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Transparent Posted by: g50
» And another thing Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
» RE: And another thing Posted by: Lauren
» RE: And another thing Posted by: Longdream
Obviously tapping
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 12, 2008 12:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
her kids' supply of blow these days.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ferraro is right on the mark!
Posted by: mstenger on Mar 12, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought that what she said was already a given? Of course Obama wouldn't be as popular if he were white. Because he is black is a big part of his popularity. I've heard many comments about his race and Hillary's sex throughout the campaign. This is no different. I don't think Ferraro's comments are out of line at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WTF? Posted by: rinpochet
» RE: WTF? Posted by: andrushka
» RE: Ferraro is right on the mark! Posted by: Fishbone Soldier
I won't say Ferrarp was "on the mark"
Posted by: EdinIowa on Mar 12, 2008 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But at least in one respect Ferraro was right, whether she was aware of it or not. IF Obama had been just another white senator up on that stage among Biden and Edwards and Dodd and the rest, it's a big question mark whether he would be where he is today.

But that is BECAUSE of the way the media - the corporate mainstream media - has been presenting this campaign for a long time. It was the MSM that insisted on making this a 2 person race between the Woman and the Black man. It was the MSM that relegated Edwards to the sidelines - even though he came out of Iowa in second place. The MSM made this race a 2 person race even when it wasn't and they are the ones who thought it would be great if it were a race between race and gender and they insured us that it would be - to the detriment of all the other candidates.

It may be that it would've shaken out this way anyhow. I'm not in any way denigrating Obama as a candidate. He is the best candidate we have today - both in experience and judgement.

But at least in respect to the treatment he has gotten from the media, I think it's very true that this campaign would've been much different if Obama were a white male. Whether that is at all what Ferraro was trying to convey I have no idea. It's doubtful though.

(Of course that same media will also step up to destroy him when it serves their purposes)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Privileged white women behaving cluelessly--again
Posted by: Kym525 on Mar 12, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's think about Ms. Ferraro's statement a little, shall we?

A half black/half white guy with a weird and definitely not "american" name of "Barack Hussein Obama" has a better chance of being president than someone named "Hilary Rodham Clinton"? Really? Would he have a a harder time if his name were "DeJuan Derrick Johnson"?
Think about the fact that young black males are considered threatening by society at large (even those in three piece suits), somehow blackness is an advantage?

On what planet, pray tell.

I'm a black WOMAN and both race and gender are used against me and they are the things I struggle against daily. Once again Ms. Ferraro, like so many of her privileged second-wave feminist ilk play oppression politics while ignoring (or simply not giving a damn) about how racism is just as much a stumbling block as gender. It's really quite apparent that white women (SOME, not all) really don't care anything about race because it has NOTHING to do with them. They didn't attack Don Imus because his comments were racist; they went after him because they were sexist against female athletes. The racism thing just happened to attach itself, but race was never the focus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tell it like it is, Kym Posted by: Longdream
Birds of a Feather....
Posted by: seacaptdon on Mar 12, 2008 12:00 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that both Hillary Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro have things in common...

Both are monsters!

And both fit into Webster's definition of a bitch! (Webster: 1. the female of a dog; 2. a bad-tempered, mean or spiteful woman: a course term of contempt; 3. a complaint or to complain/whine...)

It is amazing that they are the ones who have to keep getting the attention off of the issues with attacks (racial, gender and otherwise) on their opponent.

If Hillary had anything in the positive realm of accomplishment she could be touting that instead of trying to degrade her opposition. No matter how many times I ask Hillarites to name even one credible accomplishment she has done that qualifies her to be president and even more critical Commander-in-Chief no one can list even one.

It seems to me that she is the one who can only give speeches with nothing to back them up. Where is her Resume? What are her qualifications? What is her alleged experience??? Someone please tell me?

I can think of many things that dis-qualify her to be president, but none that do qualify her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How sad, and how pathetic, that you people so easily fall into this trap
Posted by: johnp on Mar 12, 2008 1:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this rabble-rousing piece of gargabe; is a liar and a creep, calling Clinton an "ass hole." That
AlterNet permits a low life like yourself to lie and manipulate people this way, is astonishing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The article "states" that Ferraro's remarks are racist. You are being had.
Posted by: johnp on Mar 12, 2008 1:15 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean to say, that because an asshole comes to this site and
"says" that Ferraro made "racist" remarks, you all believe him? You are a bunch of imbeciles, and deserve the right wingers that always end up pushing suckers like you around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whose being had? Posted by: foreverhope
Todd
Posted by: ToddSmith on Mar 12, 2008 2:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that Ferraro's comments were unnecessary and detracted from the campaign.

I hope that Hilary distances herself from Ferraro's comments so that emotions do not have a deciding factor in this election.
We should not get caught up in deciding who should be the next President based upon a desire to have the first Woman President or the first Black President.
This is not about entitlement, we cannot afford that. It should not be about who we think would have the better chance of beating Senator McCain. Polls have proven to be invalid in predicting the future outcome of a campaign as witnessed by the results of the Texas and Ohio primaries.
I believe that feelings should not be a substitue for objective analysis when choosing an elected official. Most of us choose an attorney or a doctor based upon reputation and ability rather than likeability. Why would we not give the same consideration in choosing the President?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ferraro's true colors
Posted by: Figfest on Mar 12, 2008 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I honestly don't believe that Geraldine Ferraro is racist, but her remark definitely was. Ferraro was a pioneer and deserved our admiration.

But she is a Beltway insider and a party hack and, in recent years, mainly a lobbyist. I think her remarks reflect a desperation in the Clinton camp who expected a coronation and couldn't hide their feeling of entitlement.

I still mourn the old Ferraro. What a shame that this becomes her legacy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If we really end up with a President McCain ...
Posted by: realmuzik on Mar 12, 2008 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... the idea of moving outside of the USA sounds ever-so-wonderful. Many municipalities are very welcoming of American ex-pats who have left their homeland because they are fed up with how their government is treating them. I'm in-communicado with several of my overseas friends on this matter, too. Nothing will change when McCain becomes President. Nothing. Our country desperately needs change and as a citizen who cares deeply about it, I can no longer be a part of it if all the grassroots organizing I do is doing nothing but going in and out the ears of those who need to benefit from it the most. Our self-serving selfishness is doing us in. I will leave in protest if I absolutely must.

DEMOCRATS, YOU ARE WARNED. THIS INFIGHTING AND CATFIGHTING MUST STOP!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE AS IT IS
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Mar 12, 2008 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never was a Clinton (Hillary) backer until the mainstream media AND AlterNet shut out the best candidate running this year, Bill Richardson, and other good ones.

Now, with two left, we are left with the large numbers of self proclaimed "progressive" voters and bloggers who are intimidated into backing Obama in order to prove their own "progressiveness."

Put another way, Obama's campaign, language and demeanor all suggest that the Democrat who does not vote for him is 'not progressive enough to vote for a Black candidate.'

From the beginning there has been that (mostly) unspoken burden of proof put on the voters: You have to PROVE that you are progressive enough to vote for and elect a Black President.

The hypocrisy is that Obama claims never to use the race trump in the campaign; he has used the race trump from the beginning and every step of the way. He plays the race trump to white and mixed audiences all the time, claiming that his election to the White House represents adequate change in America away from the practices of the Establishment in Washington.

It does not. An end to racism in American would mean that the United States is ready and willing to accept a merger with the thirty-one States of the Republic of Mexico into a single Republic over the period of several decades. Only racism here stands in the way of this progressive direction.

He plays the race trump to Black audiences by claiming that he is one of them, and they deserve to be represented in the White House, as if to say, "It's about time."

The same tactics used by Ole-Time Preachers are being used today in the Obama campaign: If you don't say Amen, you must be planning to sin again and you'll burn in hell for that.

Translation: If you don't vote for Obama you must be a racist, a Republican, or part of the corrupt Establishment . . .or all three.

If enough voters are gullible enough to put this man in the White House, four years from now they will be told: Keep hopin' for change for the better, and it might come to you. I never told you what I would actually do if I get the power, I just told you to believe.

Yet, for all these words from supposedly "progressive" voters and concerned citizens who have joined the Obama mania, why is it that no one seems to raise the question of Obama's silence on the single most pressing issue of this election year?

Hint: It is not immigration, the Wars in the the Middle East, or race, or any of the top ten on the issues list.

These are the words of Thomas A. Nagy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THIS! Posted by: foreverhope
I. Don't. Care.
Posted by: 2dogarage on Mar 12, 2008 8:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a bunch of babies. Stick to the issues and fuck this distraction.

Whoever is even talking about this shit should stick to solid reporting.

I'm sick of hearing about the mean-spirited sparring between the two media-appointed candidates for the Democratic nomination. I hate them both by now. Luckily not as much as I hate McCain.

If I wanted to watch "American Idol" I'd just watch it, OK?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OK! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: OK! Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: OK! Posted by: foreverhope