Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Unfairly Attacked for Crimes He Didn't Commit (Again)

Posted by Bob Cesca, Huffington Post at 10:11 AM on December 11, 2008.


We've seen this show before: the Right try to connect Obama with a controversial figure in Chicago and the Media go nuts.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

We've seen this show before: specious attempts to connect Barack Obama with corrupt or controversial figures in Chicago, followed, then, by a Republican and establishment media outcry for the president-elect to denounce and reject them.

A friend wrote earlier today:

I'm pretty sure you can tie Obama to the first Daley administration and its attendant corruption. Also, wasn't Obama somehow connected to Chicago crime boss Al Capone? And are you going to tell me that Chicago-based Obama was never involved in milking Mrs. O'Leary's arsonist cow?

We just can't be sure, can we? To be on the safe side, perhaps the president-elect ought to denounce and reject the cow anyway. Forcefully. Several times. While he's at it, how about rejecting Principal Rooney from the Chicago-based movie Ferris Bueller's Day Off? Breaking and entering the Bueller household through the dog door? I mean, come on, Mr. President-elect! That's not only a felony but also an egregious abuse of high school administrative power, sir, and you must denounce it.

It began yesterday with the RNC demanding to know the full extent of the president-elect's relationship with Blagojevich even though Patrick Fitzgerald was perfectly clear about the relationship when he said on national television that the president-elect had nothing to do with any of it. But to suggest that the former junior senator from Illinois never communicated with the governor of Illinois is ridiculous on its face -- of course there was the usual level of professional communication there, though it entirely fails to prove or even implicate any corruption on the part of Barack Obama. Then again, since when does reality matter?

Meanwhile, the Politico and numerous other news organizations have been attempting to make this the first "scandal" of the Obama presidency as if Blagojevich is somehow a member of the transition or an appointee to the future administration. The truth is Obama never endorsed Blagojevich and Blagojevich never endorsed Obama. Unless you consider Blagojevich's obnoxious "fuck him" remark to be an endorsement, that is.

Sean Hannity last night played the preemptive Minority Report card by suggesting that the president-elect could, some day in the future, become involved with the Blagojevich pay-or-play scam. In the future, Hannity said from the cockpit of his time-traveling DeLorean, Obama might grant favors to Blagojevich. And then he'll be doomed! Sometime in the future. Maybe.

On the clearly "liberal" MSNBC, daytime anchors went from not being able to pronounce the Illinois governor's name yesterday to repeatedly suggesting this morning that the president-elect wasn't forceful enough in his initial denouncement. Odd, considering this was exactly what RNC chairman Mike Duncan said in his statement.

Speaking of MSNBC, the word of the day in the establishment press? "Taint." To wit, my inner Beavis & Butthead giggled at this actual on-air MSNBC exchange:

NORAH O'DONNELL: Can Obama avoid being tainted by all of this?

CHUCK TODD: It depends on your definition of taint.

Huh-huh. Seriously, the only taint here is the taint that's being forced upon the president-elect by, well, all of the aforementioned taint... mongers? Taint merchants?

Nevertheless, as I write this, the president-elect has released a new statement calling for the governor to resign. This of course begs the establishment press topic for the rest of the day: Was Obama's statement calling for the governor's resignation strong enough? Should Obama release a third statement demanding that Blagojevich be launched into space inside of a creepy Phantom Zone square like the one from Superman II?

Really, is there anything the President-elect can do to satisfy these people?

Let's check the recent historical record. When former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay was accused of ethics violations and money laundering, and then was indicted on charges of conspiring to commit campaign finance fraud and consequently resigned from Congress in disgrace, President Bush publicly denounced and rejected DeLay -- a fellow Texan.

Oh. Wait. President Bush didn't denounce DeLay at all. In fact...

Bush Expresses a Belief in DeLay's Innocence
New York Times
President Bush Shows Support to Embattled DeLay
The News Hour
President Says DeLay Is Not Guilty of Money Laundering
The Washington Post
Bush Declares DeLay Innocent
The Washington Post
Lott urges Bush to give DeLay 'aggressive support'
The Washington Times
Bush to Give DeLay a Lift to Show Support
The Los Angeles Times

Read that last headline again. Not only did President Bush not denounce and reject the corrupt Republican leader, but DeLay was literally rewarded with a free ride aboard Air Force One. Both men wantonly tainting each other aboard the presidential aircraft.

Contrastingly, Obama can't even live in the same state as Blagojevich without having to emphatically denounce the governor's crimes and stupidity. And even when he denounces and rejects Blagojevich, he's still defined as tainted.

The double standard confounds reason. Once again, Digby's prescient use of the phrase "intellectual violence" applies here: the shameless ability of the far-right and certain members of the establishment press to violently ignore reality and embrace dishonesty and hypocrisy at a level far beyond that of normal silly-season discourse. A while back, for example, I wrote that it was only a matter of time before the far-right attacked the president-elect for taking a vacation, even though President Bush set a White House record for vacations. And sure enough, it happened.

It appears as if in this post-Bushie universe, the president-elect doesn't have to be involved in corruption in order to be pegged as corrupt. Indeed, he can be entirely and vigorously declared corruption-free and still be tagged with a scarlet letter "T" (for "taint"). This is what we can expect for the next four years. The crazy has only just begun.

Digg!

Tagged as: corruption, obama, chicago, illinois, gov. rod blagojevich, corrupt establishment

Bob Cesca is a writer, director and producer, and the founder of Camp Chaos, an animation studio based near Philadelphia


Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
WOS of TMIC
Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal on Dec 11, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too much of our media is a wholly owned subsidary of the military industrial complex.

The media is who actually led us to war based on lies. I believe it is time for a class action lawsuit against them for taking us to war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WOS of TMIC Posted by: jvaljon1
» RE: WOS of TMIC Posted by: jvaljon1
There's no "there" there
Posted by: ohb0b on Dec 11, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As usual.
Newsmax ran an article asking "What did Obama know, and when did he know it?" accusing his staff, of all things having contact with the Illinois governor's office concerning his Senae replacement.

Well, duh! You would expect the president-elect to be in contact with the governor to find a replacement for his Senate seat.

What is important is:

The Obama staff refused to play ball with them, and in fact, may have been instrumental in notifying the Justice Department.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BEING REALISTIC
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 11, 2008 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not possible to emerge from Chicago without having known some of the wrong people. That's true of all big cities. The 'association' thing' has to be taken with a grain of salt. I grew up in Newark NJ and remember when 24 public school teachers were arrested and fired for being members of the Communist Party. That doesn't make me a Communist. I still say there's nothing like growing up in a big city. I wouldn't have it any other way. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BEING REALISTIC Posted by: 2thepoint
Well said
Posted by: janelynne on Dec 12, 2008 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Intellectual violence" doesn't begin to explain what is going on. The content of journalism is getting underwritten by special interests, and has transformed from an analysis and information based model into a messege driven advertizing model. The talking heads on television are being fed these questions by their producers, ad infinitum. It doesn't matter if the question gets answered. The message is actual the goal.

If one notes of the sponsors who sell air time, and one notices who runs and owns the networks, one can cobble together who is trying to use the news to get out the message. It is the same people who gave Bush an eight year honeymoon, and who are dogging Obama, even before the nuptuals.

Bloggers, intellectuals, and people who think, all need to become the actual purveyors of information, to provide the background, offer analysis, and they need to stand up to the exaggerations and false associations that mainstream press will continue to churn out. The taint of "message" is rampant, and will not be going away anytime soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well said Posted by: munchkinpup
Anyone see that bus!
Posted by: 2thepoint on Dec 12, 2008 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people will Obama toss under that bus!

Obamas problem is two fold. First, he has denied obvious facts for two years.. Rev Wright ( I never heard him utter those words...) Bill Ayers liberals most beloved terrorists, Franklin Raines - the million$ criminal of Fannie Mae, Antoin Rezko - criminal who was close enough to Obama to help make a deal for his below market purchase of his house.

No one really believes his denials any more. One just figures like most politicians he lies and he has relationships he'd rather not talk about.

Second, Obama is a product of the Chicago political machine and the nations most corrupt state. Their former gov is in jail,, the current gov is going to jail and the Lt gov can't be trusted. It's so bad they will probably have to call another general election to try to restore public faith in their political process..what a joke.. The democrats control this entire mess so nothing can be done in that state without tainting your hands, Obama's included.

Obama's chief of staff is known to have had meetings with Blagojevich concerning the senate seat (who knows what was discussed).

So , yes, Obama will be POTUS, but one cannot wonder how far his connections will go to insulate him from all this. After all..a lot more is at stake than a senate seat. Our nation !

Amazing that for all of Bush's screw ups he's looking pretty honest compared to what might be hidden in Obama's closet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and then you woke up... Posted by: surfreality
» RE: Anyone see that bus! Posted by: Shey
» RE: Anyone see that bus! Posted by: VZEQICVA
not fair, but that's politics
Posted by: ayala on Dec 12, 2008 4:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is a pretty whiney article. of course it is not fair, but this is how politics go. think of all of the millions of articles that linked bush to scandals that he wasn't a part of in the last eight years. both parties do this to each other and it seems that even obama understands that this is part of the job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have a bridge I'd like to show you!!!
Posted by: Pegaleg on Dec 12, 2008 4:53 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think Bush looks pretty honest you surely have been drinking the KoolAid. People like you hope for Obama's failure. Shame on you. Eight years with a fool in the White House is coming to an end. To think Obama is tainted by the actions of the Illinois governor is wishful thinking on your part. Wishing won't make it so. I believe we have Obama's Chief of Staff to thank for the feds closing in on "the idiot Governor" and his attempted sale of a Senate seat. Emmanuel put a stop to the madness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tintone
Posted by: abdo46 on Dec 12, 2008 8:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AS it looks now the attack machinery that took on the Clinton's started already. But Obama are able to defend himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tintone Posted by: VZEQICVA