Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The AP and CNN Get 'The Huxtable Effect' All Wrong

Posted by Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez, Brave New Films at 1:30 PM on November 13, 2008.


Why the mainstream media got 'The Huxtable Effect' wrong.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

Sigh. The good thing about having a blog is that you have a blog. The bad thing about having a blog is that news reporters can take your theories and mangle them all to hell and publish it all over the world.

Today, the Associated Press had a piece crediting me with something I never did. They claim I have a theory that The Cosby Show is why Obama was elected.

What I actually posited was much more complex than that. I said that the social norms of a population are generally formed through its popular culture.

I also said that many social scientists agree that political movements of sweeping scope must be rooted in prior cultural movements, in order to prime the public for the change. Most notably this theory was put forth by Harold Cruse in his book The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual.

Cruse points out that the Civil Rights Movement in the US needed the Harlem Renaissance in literature, art and music to prime the next generation to truly believe themselves capable of producing the political change they sought was possible. The one helps the other.

This pattern of political change echoing cultural change happens across the world, in every culture. It adheres to the concept in social sciences that in order for the status quo to actually change in a society, many sectors of the public must coalesce around that change.

Popular culture and entertainment tend to be the most effective tools for changing public perception. (Sorry news media!)

The US government knows this; that is why it has, over the years, spent billions on covert propaganda, such as the "good neighbor" Hollywood films starring Carmen Miranda, coming at a time when our nation sought to make inroads in Latin America.

There are endless examples of this, and they continue to this day. I am a TV writer, and in my circle it is well-known that the networks were all waiting until the elections to decide which shows that were in development would be put into production.

The independence movements in Latin America are beautiful examples of poetry preceding politics, with poets and musicians often leading the way to a new sense of national identity through their work. It is no mistake that in much of Latin America the revolutionaries have also been poets or singers. No mistake that when Pinochet rounded up those most dangerous to his regime, it was the artists and writers he killed first.

It is only in America that we pretend the arts and culture are separate from politics, evidenced clearly in the AP's profound misinterpretation of my words today, and in the supposedly unbiased article's dismissive last line, aka "kicker."

By having Cosby himself joke about the Bart Simpson voter, the AP not only did not understand the nuance of what I had put forth (or the fact that it is not ME saying it, but the discipline of sociology), they managed to make what they thought was my point (but was not) look idiotic. By going to Cosby himself and saying "are you responsible for Obama?" the AP not only misses the point that both men are part of greater movements, they neuter the thesis.

Ironically, the AP has taken a stark, datedly individualistic approach to this piece (one man's work begets the next?) rather than the community approach that both movements in question present.

This is disappointing, but not surprising. The news media have, throughout American history, been woefully behind the ball on these issues. If you want to know the truth of a time, I say, look to its popular culture - to it's novels and movies. If you want to know the myths of a time, look to its "objective news."

What I actually said: I believe Cosby was part of a massive movement in US pop culture, begun in the mid-1980s, that elevated the mainstream image of African Americans in TV, movies, music and literature. This movement included talk show host Oprah Winfrey, singer Whitney Houston, the entire mainstream hip-hop and rap movement, Denzel Washington, Will Smith, and many others; and it continues today. (It even, for better of worse, included the Carlton dance.)

That a generation grew up with these images as the norm contributes greatly to that generation's ability to see other African Americans as not only being part of their daily lives and "just like us," but as being smart, capable leaders. The cultural movement went a long way toward chipping away at the racist attitudes of the past.

It would be absurd and stupid for anyone to say Bill Cosby's show alone was the reason for Obama's presidency. The only person I have heard say that is Karl Rove -- him and the Associated Press, which, we should remember, is not a person.

For my part, I have said that Obama is one part of a political movement made possible in part by a massive cultural movement begun in the mid 1980s. It takes a village to raise a president.

The NY Times also sort of mangled my ideas when they tried to run with it last week (the AP then likely copying them). Both the Times and the AP -- and, I am now told my a friend, CNN -- have grossly over-simplified what I wrote.

But then, that's what corporate media do all too well: oversimplify complicated issues. The result, in this case, is to make the argument look stupid.

Both the Times and the AP missed what I thought was the most important point of my argument: most other oppressed minority groups in America have not had the type of pop culture movement needed to prime the population to accept their equality at a political level.

In particular, Latinos have had essentially no dignified presence in pop culture and, in fact, we face a staggering rise in hate crimes against us at this time in history due to the scapegoating and nativist fearmongering that, sadly, almost always accompanies an economic downturn in any society.

It is therefore dangerous for the AP, Times and other media to proclaim Obama's presidency the sign that "race" is over in America.

For many of us, the "race" has just begun.


Absurd: Joe 'the Plumber' to Become War Correspondent
Samuel "Joe" Wurzelbacher is heading to Israel as a war correspondent for a conservative website called pjtv.com.
Post by Isaac Fitzgerald. January 7, 2009.
The GOP and Technology = Water and Oil
It's just awkward (and funny) to listen to Republican leaders talk about how hip they are to the tools the kids are using on the tubes.
Post by Steve Benen. January 6, 2009.
Fox News Claims 'Magic Negro' Text Was 'Inadvertently Cleared for Air'
Fox New has a history of allowing racially-charged language aimed at Obama and his family to make it on air and then claiming it was simply a mistake
Post by Matt Corley. January 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cosby proved Blacks can be boring too .
Posted by: Kahoneez on Nov 13, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the Cosby show proved was that a black family can be every bit as bland and boring too as white people, but then again that's narrow view of the media . Look what the coz open the doors to today , has been rappers like Coolio with his with reality show , ice-T doing a crime show , Ice Cube doing comedies, (that's a freakish thought) and the dozens of Mama house movies, copying each other faster than a Chinese computer company .
Cosby had no more to do with Obama making it , than the Kind he smoked growing up in Hawaii .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just. Odd.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 13, 2008 3:11 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Both the Times and the AP missed what I thought was the most important point of my argument: most other oppressed minority groups in America have not had the type of pop culture movement needed to prime the population to accept their equality at a political level.

What of Chinese immigrant citizens? Korean immigrant citizens? Japanese immigrant citizens?

You really need to delve into lots and lots of subjective qualifiers--

"oppressed"

"minority groups"

"pop-culture"

needed to "prime the population?" (what the Sam Hill does that even mean, in English?)

"to accept their equality at the political level"

--to begin to understand the author's opinion. I mean, seriously: if you were a "social scientist", you could write a dissertation on any of these memes, these tools of opinion-oriented dialogue.

Can someone explain, concisely what the author is on about?

In particular, Latinos have had essentially no dignified presence in pop culture and, in fact, we face a staggering rise in hate crimes against us at this time in history due to the scapegoating and nativist fearmongering that, sadly, almost always accompanies an economic downturn in any society.

What exactly does the author consider "dignified", and what exactly does she demand in a society that values freedom of expression? If she is subject to a hate crime--i.e., somebody beats on her, is she not also entitled to prosecution of that _sshat for hitting her? I'm not afraid of immigrants--we've (literally) built our country! I'm not afraid of the idea that those who deprive of others of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness through violent means ought to be locked away to think about what they did! We have to get violent _sshats off the streets, even racist ones! Punish those that perform "hate crimes" just as you would those that do "crimes". They're criminals!

What's her problem? Why the focus on race? And why should her ignorant opinions matter, more than say your average klanners ignorant opinion? So yeah, I see the beef with why the sound-bite oriented MSM picked it up. Racism sells.

Was there any sort of argument here? Or was it just yellow* bogg(er)ing begetting yellow journalism?

*no pun intended

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Every Article Put Forth Posted by: desidid
P. dam S. : What the hell did the Carlton dance ever do to you?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Nov 13, 2008 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People around the world who can't dance feel discriminated against because of your hate speech*.




*used in the same sense as "speech i hated to hear", "stupid speech", "speech i wish I hadn't heard" and other contemporary forms of "hate speech".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Explains a lot...
Posted by: madmac10 on Nov 14, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This theory goes a long way toward explaining what happened to Pop Music. A couple of years back some nutcase brought suit against George Bush (Sr.?) for co-opting the music industry with Cointelpro. While his assertions may have been grossly exaggerated, I do believe that the dominant culture neutered the poignancy of Pop Music after Woodstock. It has been starkly evident over the past decade how weak the cultural underpinnings of popular culture has been in effecting immediate change the way it did in the sixties.

I mean, god! Except for a notable few (e.g., Radiohead,) have y'all noticed how emasculated Pop music is these days? Remember Grandmaster Flash? Now we have hyper-masculine stereotypes spanking booty-bumping gold-diggers with fans of dollar bills. You think that's an accident? Likewise, the consequences will be felt in about a decade.

Perhaps my advancing years has taken my eyes off what is really happening in today's underground (I know! and perhaps it causes me to look back through rose-colored glasses.) No, I'm fairly sure that fascism has finally learned something: instead of assassinating the artists, suborn them instead. And their fruit will be strange indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Check Out Flobots! Posted by: desidid
» RE: Check Out Flobots! Posted by: DaBear
» RE: xplains a lot...Not Popular Posted by: blackie4aces
Thanks for the clarification, Alisa.
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 14, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The whole Huxtable thing was really annoying me. Everytime the talkingbots dig into something like this you can bet there's some form of craptastic stoopid going on in the feeble minds of the overly-primped and overly-paid.

I'm glad to know what the hell it was underneath it all and how it actually makes sense coming from the source rather than the beautiful mind of some owning-class simp.

For those who didn't understand the point of Alisa's article... I feel for you. Don't worry, it's probably just a senior moment. Get some coffee, a bagel, maybe a doughnut... then re-read. I'm sure it'll snap into focus for you. We all have bad mornings.

I thoroughly enjoyed the Carlton dance... made my morning. Whatever happened to that guy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pop culture is the lead?
Posted by: bemidjigreen on Nov 16, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the author is offended that the media oversimplified his theory. Hmm.

Does it occur to the author that his theory itself (correctly elaborated or not) is rather simplistic in the first place?

So how does civil rights, integration, busing, affirmative action, etc. play into an Obama rising to political power in America. How about the rise Oprah, or Denzel, or Cosby, or any of the other pop icons listed by author.

Do you think any of these people would have risen to national prominence without major shifts in policy intended to undo decades of oppression?

Pop culture does not LEAD anything other than fads. If you want to toss Obama on the dunghill of rubics cube, pet rocks, line dancing, etc. its your choice. But his rise is much more relevant than that.

Your little theory is as shallow as its reflection in the media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]