Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Network Feud Fuels O'Reilly Attacks on GE, Olbermann

Posted by Mike Connery, AlterNet at 8:32 AM on May 19, 2008.


A TV-made political feud has morphed into a proxy battle between executives at the highest levels of Fox News and NBC.
olbermannoreilly
O'Reilly Olbermann

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

There's an interesting article by Howard Kurtz in today's Washington Post detailing how a feud between TV pundits has morphed into a proxy battle between executives at the highest levels of Fox News and NBC. That feud is in large part fueling the recent attacks by Bill O'Reilly on the GE corporation:

Bill O'Reilly, the Fox News star, is mounting an extraordinary televised assault on the chief executive of General Electric, calling him a "pinhead" and a "despicable human being" who bears responsibility for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq.
On the surface, O'Reilly's charges revolve around GE's history of doing business with Iran. But the attacks grow out of an increasingly bitter feud between O'Reilly and the company's high-profile subsidiary, NBC, one that has triggered back-channel discussions involving News Corp. owner Rupert Murdoch, Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes, NBC chief executive Jeff Zucker and General Electric's CEO, Jeffrey Immelt.
Ailes called Zucker on his cellphone last summer, clearly agitated over a slam against him by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann. According to sources familiar with the conversation, Ailes warned that if Olbermann didn't stop such attacks against Fox, he would unleash O'Reilly against NBC and would use the New York Post as well.
Both Fox and the Post are owned by Murdoch, who complained about Olbermann's conduct in separate calls to Zucker and Immelt.
The high-level appeals failed, and O'Reilly has escalated his criticism of GE in recent weeks, declaring, "If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt."
Not to whitewash GE's record on Iran, which I know little about, but I think Attaturk at FireDogLake has the proper response the Bill-O's attacks. That's all secondary, though. The real meat of the piece outlines how the O'Reilly/Olbermann feud has become something of a proxy war between executives at the highest levels of both networks struggling for a ceasefire, even as they disclaim any responsibility for the escalation of rhetoric on the part of Olbermann and O'Reilly.

What began four years ago as a colorful feud between rival commentators, instigated by Olbermann as a way of drawing attention, has become a tale of bruised egos and secret maneuvering at the highest levels of two multinational giants.
Fox News spokesman Brian Lewis said Ailes never offered a "quid pro quo" involving a cease-fire by O'Reilly and Olbermann. "That's editorial control of Bill's show, and we don't do that," he said. "Bill doesn't run topics by Roger, or anyone else for that matter."
Lewis dismissed the notion that Ailes has ever suggested using Murdoch's tabloid for revenge, saying: "Roger doesn't control the editorial policy of the New York Post."
....
Asked about O'Reilly's motivation, Sheffer said that executives at Murdoch's News Corp. "tell us if the attacks on O'Reilly end, the attacks on GE will end. They've had conversations with our news executives saying, 'If you stop, we'll stop.' " An NBC spokeswoman confirmed the calls.
Fox would not comment on the criticism of Immelt, and O'Reilly declined to be interviewed.
....
Early last year, the sources say, Capus called Ailes to say that O'Reilly had gone over the line with reckless attacks on Engel. But, the sources recounted, Ailes said he agreed that NBC was against the war and had aligned itself with Olbermann's mockery. Capus, he said, had the power to shut down the situation by telling Olbermann to back off.
The conversation grew tense as Capus asked whether Ailes was threatening him with retaliation by O'Reilly and News Corp. if Olbermann kept up his criticism. Ailes kept returning to highly personal comments by Olbermann, whom he referred to with an expletive, and the impasse remained. The sources declined to be identified furnishing details of private conversations.
In last summer's conversation between Ailes and Zucker -- the two men have known each other since Zucker tapped him as a commentator for the "Today" show in the early 1990s -- the onetime Republican consultant asked whether NBC still cared about the truth. Olbermann had inaccurately called Ailes "the lead political consultant for Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign." Ailes worked for Giuliani's New York mayoral campaign in 1989, but no evidence has surfaced that he played a role in the presidential bid.
Zucker did nothing as a result of the call. "I have never asked Keith Olbermann to tone anything down," he said in a brief interview.
Even Rupert Murdoch has intervened in the feud, notably after blogger/activist Mike Stark had some success in drawing attention to O'Reilly's hypocrisy:
Murdoch's call to Zucker, which was polite in tone, involved a request that Olbermann not air video from a Daily Kos blogger who had made a scene at O'Reilly's Long Island home. That, Murdoch said, should be off limits.
Considering the implications of network heads exercising such control over editorial content, Howard Kurtz does a pretty poor job of plumbing below the surface in his article. Nevertheless, the reporting provides an important peek into the kind of manipulation and horse trading that goes on at networks over sensitive topics - particularly when the credibility of the network or one of its reporters is on the line.

Digg!

Tagged as: iran, media, o'reilly, olbermann, fox news, nbc


Fox Mogul Rupert Murdoch Echoes Glenn Beck, Calls Obama a Racist
So much for the supposed "truce" between Fox and the White House.
Post by Steve Benen. November 10, 2009.
Woops! Bill O'Reilly Doesn't Remember What the Public Option Is Called, or That It's Pretty Popular (Video)
Big Bill was shut down unexpectedly last night by fellow Fox Newser Brit Hume. Go figure.
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 10, 2009.
Bill O'Reilly Goes After Sesame Street: ‘We May Have To Ambush Oscar’
"Add one more soldier to the Left's war on Fox News: Oscar the Grouch."
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Now this is interesting . . .
Posted by: Scientz on May 19, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . a proxy-war between corporations waged by their most visible news personalities.

Sounds like something out of Jeffrey Archer's The Fourth Estate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

entertainment vs information
Posted by: carbon-based on May 19, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what our media has come to.. they are more interested in what the other guy is saying about them then what is actually happening outside their little world. They are truly in the entertainment business.. not the information business

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And we claim to have 'free press'?
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on May 19, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of us have long known that TV pundits are nothing but Corporate hacks doing the bidding of their pay-masters.

And yet, majority of Americans still believe the 'news' from the cable/network TV.

No wonder we are a crumbling empire in its last throes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

O'Reilly is sad
Posted by: RobNLA on May 19, 2008 12:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently O'Reilly can dish it out but can't take it, so he tries to attack NBC and GE instead.

It's sad really.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"If my child were killed in Iraq, I would blame the likes of Jeffrey Immelt."
Posted by: bitsfick on May 19, 2008 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like a rich white repubican would have a child in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: orally is a dumbass
Posted by: hermjo on May 20, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith Olbermann is a real man, a brave man with integrity who seeks and tells the truth. He gives NBC cachet and he is the future husband of Stephanie Miller. Bill O'LIEly is "a lying sack of crap, a lying sack of crap, a lying, stinking, nasty, steaming sack of liquid crap!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HAH!
Posted by: Longdream on May 19, 2008 7:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is pretty funny, I must say.

I can just see Ailes and O'Reilly waving their little fists in the air with all the dignity of month-old infants. Yaaah! Yaaah!

Silly asses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the shape of the times
Posted by: talkville on May 20, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is to be expected. The Right will become even more shrill as election year approaches towards November. It would be well not to under-estimate it too much. When Badgers and Savage Barbarians and Pirates get cornered......

Well, I'm just saying: it would be a mistake to expect civility, humanity, integrity or justice from this sector of the populace. Historical evidence overwhelmingly points other-wise. Plus they enjoy a finely-honed propaganda network including PR firms, radio, tv and internet and have lots and lots and lots of money (or 'loot' or 'booty' as it is expressed in the vernacular). They have developed well the instrumental aspects of language and of texts, both secular and sacred, in the service of Power.

Demagogues like O'Reilly and Limbaugh are but the lower rungs of their "message-multiplying' forces. But best not to ignore them; the 'fuel' is plentiful in more obscure and darkened places: the Academy, the Think Tanks, the Media Organizations (why C-Span, privately funded, and not PBS?), etc. etc.

All signs point towards a shrillness of the Right, crude or savvy, but shrill nonetheless. It's the shape of the times THEY brought us all into by Hook and by Crook(s).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hobgoblins
Posted by: frank69 on May 20, 2008 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FOX Network: The hobgoblins of little minds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor Billo
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 20, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billo has the right to criticize anyone he wants....name calling, degrading remarks, outright lies....

But no one can criticize him?

Please. Bill O'Reilly deserves all the criticism we can heap on him. He is a bully and propaganda artist of the highest order!

Which is one reason I made this silly video asking bill why he likes loofahs so much!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKu8iqIuXHM

Enjoy the video. Pass it around! Let's humiliate Bill O just as much as possible!

Luv,
Granny

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Faux News is just pissed off...
Posted by: Quannah on May 20, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that their Complete Media Control Plan isn't working quite as quickly as they planned.

Bill-O is pissed because Keith has come from way behind in the ratings war, and, on some occasions - especially the nights he issues his Special Comments - has beaten O'Really in the "key demographic of 25-48" and Keith continues to gain ground. I see absolutely nothing wrong with Keith's criticism of Bill-O. He points out his hypocrisy and his lies and his distortions and his lack of journalistic integrity. He doesn't lie about Bill-O. And if he puts O'Really in a bad light, it's only because of some incredibly stooooopid thing Bill-O himself said or did.

They also hate Olbermann because he is very critical (to put it mildly) of this administration, this war, and they are the mouthpiece of this administration, this war. It puts them at odds automatically.

And as for Howard Kurtz? NO ONE in their right mind would believe anything he writes. His claim to be a "media critic" is laughable. He's a joke. If you want a real media critic, read Eric Alterman or read the Columbia Journalism Review. But certainly don't take the word of Howard Kurtz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NBC vs. CBS
Posted by: Sissy on May 20, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all remember how Dan Rather got the boot after decades working for CBS. The White House went whining to his bosses and they folded like a tent, dismissed a man of integrity and superior skill at ferreting out "the story". It will now be interesting to see if NBC will stand by their people in a way that CBS failed utterly. Of course there is a different climate now and perhaps The Texas Turd's threats no longer hold any water, but if Richard Engle goes, so will go the very last of any faith I have in MSM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NBC vs. CBS Posted by: Longdream
» RE: NBC vs. CBS Posted by: Sissy
All I have to say is that ...
Posted by: realmuzik on May 20, 2008 2:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... I'm lovin' this! It's the Feud of Feuds, and it's no contest as to who's "true colors" are really showing on this one. ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]