Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Five More Advertisers Abandon Michael Savage’s Hate-Filled Radio Show

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 5:11 AM on February 12, 2008.


The companies dropped their commercials after being contacted by visitors to the newly-created "No Savage" website.
Michael Savage Hates Muslims

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

In November 2007, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) kicked off a campaign urging "radio listeners of all faiths to contact companies that advertise on Michael Savage's nationally-syndicated radio program to express their concerns" about the conservative radio host's anti-minority tirades. Since then, Brave New Films and a coalition of interfaith leaders have joined CAIR in the campaign under the banner of Hate Hurts America.

Savage responded to the campaign by suing CAIR for copyright infringement and Fox News rose to his defense. But the advertisers have been paying attention to the Hate Hurts America initiative. On Friday, the group announced that five more advertisers have dropped "The Savage Nation":

The Hate Hurts America Community and Interfaith Coalition (HHA) today announced that five more radio advertisers have joined a growing list of companies that have stopped advertising or refuse to place their ads on Michael Savage's "Savage Nation" radio program.
HHA said the advertisers - ITT Technical Institute, Chattem, Inc. (owners of Gold Bond, Icy Hot, and Selsun Blue), Union Bank of California, Intuit (parent company of TurboTax and QuickBooks), and GEICO Insurance - dropped their commercials after being contacted by visitors to the newly-created "No Savage" website.
According to CAIR, "US Cellular, Sprint Nextel, Sears, Universal Orlando Resorts, AutoZone, Citrix, TrustedID, JCPenney, OfficeMax, Wal-Mart, and AT&T" have also stopped advertising on Savage's show. Brave New Films has a list of contact info for advertisers who are continuing to advertise with Savage.

Here are a few examples of the hate Savage has spewed over the years:

- "90 percent of the people on the Nobel Committee are into child pornography and molestation." -- Michael Savage [12/12/07]
- "Notice what this double-talking slut just did, this mind-slut Barbara Walters. And I stick by those words. She's an empty mind-slut." -- Michael Savage [3/16/07]
- Madeline Albright is "a traitor. In my opinion, she should be tried for treason, and when she's found guilty, she should be hung." -- Michael Savage [10/9/06]
- The U.S. Senate is "more vicious and more histrionic than ever, specifically because women have been injected into" it. -- Michael Savage [9/12/06]
- To "save the United States," lawmakers should institute an "outright ban on Muslim immigration" and on "the construction of mosques." -- Michael Savage [11/27/06]
Hate Hurts America's petition calling for advertisers to boycott Savage is here.

Digg!

Tagged as: radio, broadcasting, savage, right wing media

Matt Corley is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Fox Mogul Rupert Murdoch Echoes Glenn Beck, Calls Obama a Racist
So much for the supposed "truce" between Fox and the White House.
Post by Steve Benen. November 10, 2009.
Woops! Bill O'Reilly Doesn't Remember What the Public Option Is Called, or That It's Pretty Popular (Video)
Big Bill was shut down unexpectedly last night by fellow Fox Newser Brit Hume. Go figure.
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 10, 2009.
Bill O'Reilly Goes After Sesame Street: ‘We May Have To Ambush Oscar’
"Add one more soldier to the Left's war on Fox News: Oscar the Grouch."
Post by Ben Armbruster. November 10, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
hopefully proof that people are getting tired of this type of 'conservatism'
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 12, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
however this is just 'jiggling the handle' on this toilet talking trash on the airwaves. I, however, look forward to Mr. Ann coulter getting the heave-ho (pun intended). that would be a true sign of intellectual progress in political punditry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» aristotle in his 'Politics' Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Ha! How simple.
Posted by: PJAW on Feb 12, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally someone thought of the way to counter these hatemongers, cut off their money. The right wing has been "boycotting" people they dislike (progressives) for years. For some reason the "left" has never adopted this tactic (that I'm aware of) til now. I think all sponsors for all of these types of programs ought to be contacted and made aware of what they're supporting with their advertising dollars. I'm sure some sincerely don't know and simply spend money where statistics indicate there is an audience. But once they know, if they continue to spend money there, then the rest of us ought to stop buying their merchandise, and let them know why.

Good job by the HHA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real counter
Posted by: willyd1962 on Feb 12, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real way to counter these people is with truth. Shuting down free speech is not the way to do it. Them today, us tommorrow. Counter untruths with truths not by trying to shut up your opponent.

Bill moyer is almost as hateful on other people. Will he be next?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real counter Posted by: Quannah
» Free speech = red herring. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: The real counter Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: The real counter Posted by: Thucy
» RE: The real counter Posted by: Thucy
» RE: The real counter Posted by: Quannah
» RE: The real counter Posted by: Thucy
It's about time!
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 12, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get these hate-mongers off the air by using the one weapon they absolutely WORSHIP (and would never expect progressives to use against them)!

The "free market"!

The market has spoken - Goodbye!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poor Mikey
Posted by: Musked on Feb 12, 2008 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poor Mikey . . . so misunderstood. *snicker*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Small steps forward..
Posted by: boydranchitos on Feb 12, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am proud to have had a hand in this campaign. I have been emailing the hatemonger's enablers... the sponsors who promote this stuff (through buying ads) and I have been boycotting products and vendors when I am made aware of the connections..
Little by little, let's take our nation back from the robber barons and miscreant criminals that call themselves "conservatives'. If all this utter rot from the head down is "conservative", then love is indeed hate, war is peace, etc.
Thank you to all great Americans like Robert Greenwald who help us find ways to be heard .....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I want to hear it. And so should you.
Posted by: rickiey on Feb 12, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me start off by saying I don't like Savage. I don't like what he thinks. I don't like what he says. I don't like the way he says it. I haven't met him in person, but I'm assuming I wouldn't like him then, either.

But I want his words out in the open. I want him to use his right to free speech to the fullest extent. And when he wants to spew hate-filled rhetoric, I want it HEARD.

I want it opened, I want it diagnosed, I want it in the public consumption.

The last thing I want is for hate-filled rhetoric to be driven underground. It needs to be out in the open where we can keep an eye on it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let him rant
Posted by: grethart on Feb 12, 2008 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
let him rant....everyone's entitle to their 'rants..freedom of speech...boycott him...sponsors are not supporting him now...don't listen to him....someone will 'take care' of him anyway, dontcha think?....This man's rantings are LEAST of our worries right now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ninethreeone
Posted by: ninethreeone on Feb 12, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting. Any specific info on why CAIR would be objecting so strenuously to Savage? What does he say about Islam/Islamists? Any connection?
All you have to do is not listen--but also you need to know exactly why someone objects to another's free speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's objecting?
Posted by: ninethreeone on Feb 12, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting. Any specific info on why CAIR would be objecting so strenuously to Savage? What does he say about Islam/Islamists? Any connection?
All you have to do is not listen--but also you need to know exactly why someone objects to another's free speech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Evidently, Some Pathetic People Like What Savage Has To Say
Posted by: hadashito on Feb 15, 2008 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Savage did not have an audience, he would be popped of the air quickly. The really sad truth is that there is a sufficient number of people who tune in to this loudmouth moron to allow him to continue his hate filled diatribes - along with Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, the Sean Hannity/ John Gibson/Fox News "pundits", and the rest of the idiot fringe of radio/TV hatemongers representing the Repulican Party neocon wing.
Savage does not engage in the "free speech" honored in the Constituition; he spews only hate, bigotry, and stupidity. And it must be realized that his audience loves to hear it. Make no mistake, they are a prominent sector of our society - those who revel in Savage's gutter mentality because it complements their own.
Why does Savage have an audience at all ? Because his followers are stupid. Yes, STUPID. As is true of Savage and his ilk themselves, they are ignorant of facts, and incapable of, or refuse to employ, critical thought. That's a good definition of STUPIDITY. Savage and his audience display it in abundance; they are America's shame.
The monied interests who have sponsored his broadcasts are only now beginning to recognize their mistake - - and that fact is also a sad commentary on our society today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

zephyr
Posted by: zepher on Feb 15, 2008 9:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I learned of this action from Brave New Films and give them credit for doing what they've done. It was totally easy to call the advertisers supporting his program and totally edifying. All of them were very polite. This is a way to speak to bad people/orgainzations. We did it in the 60's and it worked. I have debated the free speech aspect of this, but have decided that Savages' hate talk is so damaging to so many that he will not be missed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well...
Posted by: sinfony78 on Feb 15, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i do agree with him about madeline albright, altho it's most likely for different reasons...for someone to say that the US sanctions against Iraq in the 90's that led to 500k plus deaths of civilians due to starvation and lack of medical supplies in order to teach Saddam some kind of lesson..u just can't be human

and then witnessing firsthand the results of the atrocities in Rwanda and then saying "Never again" only to sit idly by for Darfur

it just goes to show that any white house administration thinks they are far and above the civilian population and that they can maneuver policy for US interests (read: US corporate interests) not heeding any population that would be affected adversely by this policy...

i have no words to describe how i feel about these types of "leaders"

sorry for going off on a tangent, but fuck madeline albright

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]