Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

MSNBC's Brewer Adopts Anti-Gay Rhetoric

Posted by Jamison Foser, Media Matters for America at 2:53 PM on November 4, 2009.


Anchor Contessa Brewer's introduction of a segment about Maine's repeal of a law allowing same-sex marriage is right out of the right-wing playbook.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

I have frequently noted that, in addition to the three hours a day in which MSNBC is hosted by a former Republican congressman, the cable channel's daytime news reporters often adopt conservative framing.  Here's an example, from anchor Contessa Brewer's introduction of a segment about Maine's repeal of a law allowing same-sex marriage:

Contessa Brewer: "And today you can add Maine to a long line of states, about 30 so far, where voters have chosen to define marriage traditionally: The union between one man and one woman."

"Define marriage traditionally" is straight out of the anti-gay movement's talking points.  They work the phrase (and variations of it) into everything they say about the subject.  

And it isn't accurate or neutral language.

It is telling that the construction "Define marriage traditionally" is a relatively new one.  If you go back a decade, you'll be hard-pressed to find many uses of it (or variations of it) in the media.  A Nexis search for "marriage w/5 tradition! w/5 defin!" returns only 317 hits from prior to the past 10 years.

No, the phrase is new -- cooked-up by anti-gay activists, because they know "deny gay couples the right to marry" doesn't poll as well.  So why is an MSNBC anchor adopting it?

It's not like it's accurate.  It wasn't too long ago, after all, when laws in America defined marriage as the union of one white man and one white woman, or of one black man and one black woman.  That was the "traditional" definition of marriage in America, until people saw the light.  Now they want you to believe marriage has always been defined the same way, so they can claim tradition is on their side.  It isn't true -- but MSNBC anchor Contessa Brewer parrots their rhetoric

If Brewer had introduced the segment by saying that Maine voted to "discriminate against gays," you can be sure the Right would be apoplectic -- and other reporters would point to it as evidence that MSNBC is a left-wing channel.

But that isn't what happened.  What actually happened was that Brewer adopted anti-gay talking points as though they were neutral descriptions.

And Howard Kurtz, Campbell Brown, Ruth Marcus, David Zurawick and the rest of the "MSNBC-is-the-liberal-Fox" crowd won't say a word about it.

Digg!

Tagged as: gay, gay rights, gay marriage, msnbc


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post
Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009.
Hmmm ... Why Do So Many Wingnuts Have Such an Obsessive Fear of Being Raped?
It's all they can talk about in the right-wing media.
Post by Staff. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
It's too bad that MSNBC doesn't provide news in the traditional sense.
Posted by: pelican beak on Nov 4, 2009 4:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where can I go for that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Define Marriage Traditionally
Posted by: Cwood on Nov 4, 2009 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we're going to argue for tradition, we should take all of history into account - marriage should be defined as the sale of an unwed virgin girl to the parents of an unwed son for the proper exchange of rights and dowries. All this "love" crap and free choice of whom to marry is a direct offense at traditional marriage!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America is STILL not ready to join in . . .
Posted by: newsound on Nov 4, 2009 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Add Maine to the list of Ignorant States.
It's too bad that a slight majority of Americans are not ready to join a civilized world of equality and diversity . . . while believing in talking snakes, Noah's Arc and treating science and common sense as evil.

I guess it's gonna be at least 20 more years of ignorance. Can I just be frozen until then?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti Gay Comment
Posted by: dunivant66 on Nov 5, 2009 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCWFdQ9KLA4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Anti Gay Comment Posted by: KRC
Re-define marriage -
Posted by: leland61 on Nov 5, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is just more Xtian crap from the Xtian medieval playbook. Time to call religion what it is - a sickness that blocks reason, fairness, justice from consideration by infected brains.

Time for a national innoculation program - using reason and science to dispell the dark,foul clouds of religious nonsense. The ingredients for the cure are simple - reason and science. In the end they will triumph over superstition, ignorance and fear. Of course we have to remember that many of the practioners of religious trickery and thuggery thrive and make millions on these two viruses - fear and superstition. So when you attack this superstition, you attack a giant money machine that feeds these blood suckers hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking Of Gay-Marriage
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 5, 2009 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In all 31 states that have had votes on gay-marriage, gay-marriage has lost in ALL of them. Maybe this should be a lesson to all of us: Americans are for the most part hateful bigots. Real people's lives have been destroyed by these votes. No one (NO ONE) would have been hurt, on the other hand, if any of the votes on gay-marriage had gone the other way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brewer
Posted by: bettyn on Nov 5, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is the daughter of a Southern Baptist preacher. That tells you all you need to know about her.

As for me, I do not understand HOW allowing people who are attracted to those of their own gender to marry hurts anyone. It's beyond stupid and intolerant and all goes back to Rick Santorum's "man on dog" stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brewer Posted by: KRC
» RE: Brewer Posted by: