Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Former Bush Press Secretary: Obama's Criticism Of Fox Akin To Chavez Tactics

Posted by Amanda Terkel, Think Progress at 7:30 AM on October 26, 2009.


Dana Perino claims the White House attack on Fox sets a bad example for "emerging democracies."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

On Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace made sure to devote plenty of time to covering President Obama's "war on Fox News"; he even played a clip of Sean Connery as Jim Malone in The Untouchables talking about "the Chicago way" of getting things done. Former Bush press secretary Dana Perino sharply criticized the Obama administration's tactics and expressed absolute shock at the example the United States was setting for "the free press in emerging democracies," comparing the criticisms of Fox News to when "Hugo Chavez shuts down television stations":

PERINO: That was a coordinated, calculated attack. It was unbecoming. And if you look at some of the coverage of what mainstream media covers when, for example, somebody like a Hugo Chavez shuts down television stations, he calls them illegitimate.

Now, I'm not suggesting that this White House believes that they are going to come over here and shut down Fox News. But they are defining a narrative in their first year, and it's going to be very hard to recover from it. [...]

Through our State Department, we are trying to help emerging democracies get journalists and government officials to talk to one another, because freedom of the press is essential to any democracy. Believe me, they are watching this, and they have -- surely are raising questions.

Watch it:

The Obama administration, according to Reporters Without Borders, is actually setting quite a strong example of press freedom for the world. In 2008, the organization found that in terms of press freedom, the U.S. ranked 36th out of 173 countries. Its report singled out "wars carried out in the name of the fight against terrorism" as a cause for the steep decline in press freedoms around the world. Just one year later, the United States has jumped from 36th to 20th. "Barack Obama's election as president and the fact that he has a less hawkish approach than his predecessor have had a lot to do with this," concluded Reporters Without Borders.


So what type of example did the Bush administration set? A few lowlights:

-- The Pentagon had a secret program to use retired military analysts to "generate favorable news coverage of the administration's wartime performance." Most of these analysts had “ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air." When the "message machine" became public, Perino defended the program as "absolutely appropriate."

-- The U.S. military was "secretly paying Iraqi newspapers to publish stories written by American troops in an effort to burnish the image of the U.S. mission in Iraq." The articles contained anonymous quotes from U.S. military officials -- which may or may not have been authentic -- and "read more like press releases than news stories."

-- The Education Department paid conservative pundit Armstrong Williams hundreds of thousands of dollars to promote Bush's No Child Left Behind law. Even after the corruption was uncovered, the administration defended it as "a permissible use of taxpayer funds."

-- The Government Accountability Office found that the Bush administration violated anti-propaganda laws when it disguised two promotional ads -- on federal drug policy and Medicare -- as news reports. The "reports" aired on dozens of stations, and the GAO “faulted the administration for distributing seemingly independent, ready-to-air reports that did not inform viewers that they came from the government."

Bush also called a New York Times reporter "a major league asshole" -- and never apologized. In fact, Bush never gave the NYT a single interview throughout his presidency. The White House frequently went after NBC News, and Perino has admitted that they essentially froze out MSNBC "towards the end."

Transcript:

More »

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, fox news, dana perino

Amanda Terkel is Deputy Research Director at the Center for American Progress and serves as Deputy Editor for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress.


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post
Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009.
Hmmm ... Why Do So Many Wingnuts Have Such an Obsessive Fear of Being Raped?
It's all they can talk about in the right-wing media.
Post by Staff. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
This just in from the fascist front woman
Posted by: HillbillyRob on Oct 26, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the GOP that brought our government and freedoms down by claiming Iraq had WMD(which it did before they were destroyed by Sodam insanes son in law who was wildly misquoted by the Bushwhack white house)
The same folks that called us unpatriotic while installing the so called Patriot Act, that invaded my home for daring to call foul when I saw Jeb Bushes bois in Fort Lauderdale shredding ballots at our polling place, that intercepted my phone calls and emails, and put me on the no fly list for telling the truth. From the same folks that went into hiding on 911 instead of into action to defend what they KNEW was coming for the Clinton Admin (not that I'm a fan of Slick Willy)warned them and turned over to them paper work covering what they had found out because they hated our way of life and the Clintons so much that they would let it happen rather than be seen to even hint at any cooperation.
How many innocent dead and maimed? How many into the future will die from depleted uranium armor 'shielding' used in Hummers and also the ammo used will die from cancers and father or give birth to monsters from DNA damages by radiation that the bush kkklan says is 'depleted to the point of harmlessness'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just imagine
Posted by: jebpgh on Oct 26, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If CNN had led a coordinated national demonstraton against the war in Iraq during the Bush years. Can you even imagine the outcry or the level of response? But of course, Fox is just a legitimate news organization trying to hold the president accountable. No wonder it's so hard for them to figure out how to do it after all these years of sucking the last president's you know what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just imagine Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Why are Republican women mostly blonde,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 26, 2009 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
stupid parrots? Except for one brunette, the biggest idiot of them all, right Sarah? I never see an African American female right winger-I do see a few House N---ers occasionally, always men.

Just noticed thats all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

same old same old...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 26, 2009 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I don't wanna say he is like X... but he is just like X"

The difference between real comparisons and scare tactics? You don't have to make excuses for a real and accurate comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I remember Bush closing Sadr's paper because it printed stuff Bush didn't like
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 26, 2009 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. Closure of Sadr's Newspaper Elicits Shiite Fury in Iraq If I remember right it was bombed too.

I don't see the Obama administration's complaint that FOXN is not news as equivalent.

It is my opinion under Bush leadership, that US forces manufactured that war every step of the way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Venezuelan Media
Posted by: Alexander on Oct 26, 2009 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since it wasn't mentioned in this post, I want to remind folks that Chavez shutdown one TV station by not renewing its television license (remember the airwaves used by networks are public). The reason cited by the Chavez administration was the network openly supported the 2002 coup that kept Chavez out of office for a couple days. Openly supporting or asking for a coup on television is a very serious crime. And it is undeniably true of this station and others which are still allowed to continue on with their broadcasting.

Check out analysis of the media in Venezuela
here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Utter nonsense Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Utter nonsense Posted by: Sunnydayz
» RE: Utter nonsense Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Utter nonsense Posted by: Sunnydayz
» Are You A Chavez Propagandist?? Posted by: ChicagoWay
Why?
Posted by: charemor on Oct 26, 2009 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do people keep dragging our Dana Perino as if she has words of wisdom? She was nothing but a dumb bimbo mouthpiece, paid to vomit out the Bush and GOP bullshit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rare sighting, 'liberal' news
Posted by: Sister_Lauren on Oct 26, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh wait, it is just an editorial.

Accusing Obama of continuing Bush cover ups. Maybe this is news.

The Cover-Up Continues

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something smells froggy
Posted by: eddie torres on Oct 26, 2009 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Putting the news-model robot known as 'Dana Perino' aside for a moment, Amanda Terkel points out that the US has jumped from #36 to #20 in the Reporters w/o Borders 2009 Press Freedom Index.

In a country where countless major newspaper operations have gone bankrupt or initiated corporate slash-and-burn life support tactics over the past 4 years, how is America's press considered 'more free'?

Considering the conglomerated corporate media operations that constitute the US press, the Press Freedom Index questions relating to "financial pressure" on media are a little thin:

"During this period [9/1/08 to 8/31/09], was there (Yes/No):"

"15. Important news that was suppressed or not covered because of political or business pressure? Give examples."

"25. Use of the withdrawal of advertising to pressure news media (in which the government or state agencies stop buying advertising space or the government gets private firms to do this)?"

"27. Serious threats to news diversity, including threats resulting from narrow ownership of media outlets? Give a score from 0 (no threat) to 5 (very serious threat)."

Where answers like "Hell, yes, the US media is a corporate business model gone Orwellian" could be inserted, instead there are "1 to 5" scales.

The report is clearly looking for examples of government interference with the press. What if government operations are owned by the same oligarchs who own the press? Why should US government officials even bother interfering with their co-employees in the press when corporate for-profit business models and "The Market" have already done such a spectacular job of eviscerating the 4th estate?

Above all, there is only one question regarding the key issue of 'advertising revenue = corporate message control'. This report fails its US constituents miserably. The US government doesn't force private firms to pressure US media coverage with advertising revenue - it stays well away while drug, insurance, and carbon firms do it on their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wish Obama would employ "Chavez tactics"
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 26, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on a few more corporations staffed and run by walking, talking pieces of shit.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eduardo Real (Argentina)
Posted by: Eduardo Real on Oct 26, 2009 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Obama administration properly identified Fox News as the Media branch of the G.O.P. and that's right. Btw, they excluded the Fox in media briefings and meetings in which journalists can be summoned. If they're not journalists but political foes, they ought be treated as such. It is not enough to have a media to be considered a journalist. It's ludicrous.

In a brilliant article in The Nation titled "Just Don't Call it 'Journalism'", Eric Alterman says:

"It's a sad symbol of the state of contemporary American journalism that the White House communications office is doing more to maintain the honor of the profession than are many journalists. But that's just what's happening in the contretemps over Fox News. Interim White House communications director Anita Dunn has explained to the press that the White House plans to treat Fox "the way we would treat an opponent.... As they are undertaking a war against Barack Obama and the White House, we don't need to pretend that this is the way that legitimate news organizations behave."

Now, former Bush Press Secretary Dana Perino, says as a derogatory: "Obama's Criticism Of Fox Akin To Chavez Tactics". But... wait: Who, if not the Bush croonies, are less entitled to use the word 'Chávez' as a derogatory word? It is? Why? Please, do yourself a little survey: Look how Chavez is treated in The Nation, Salon, Alternet, etc., and then look the same in the Washington Post, Politico, Mo-Jo, Media Matters, Fox News and so.

Then, again: SOME press do not behave as the press is intend to. And when they behave that way, they can't pretend to be treated as such. They must be keep away from the real press treatment. Press criticism is OK and should be encouraged. Rol's usurpation, attacks and ouster attempts is another very different issue.

Such three items in the press behaviour, i.e., rol's usurpation, attacks and ouster attempts, often is known worldwide as 'Colour Revolutions' (CR) or 'Velvet revolutions' or Soft Coups.

To the classical (and successful) CR acknowledged worldwide, i.e., Yugoslavia, Georgia, Ukraine, Lebanon, Kyrgyzstan, etc., many others were tried (without success yet) in Bolivia and Argentina (2008) and Iran 2009, but they're far from concluded.

In the Argentinian case (where I live), at least, the mainstream media is owned by the rich class, and the message they air say is what the rich class and landowners expects to be assimilated by the masses: Israel is OK, but Palestinians are not, Iran and Venezuela are nearby the evil's axis, Chávez and Ahmadinejad ought to be viewed as cockroaches, and so on.

Is this message familiar to you, live you where you live? Yes, the "World Press Message" reach te Argentinian tarmac pristine and without any noticeable distortion. Our 'free press' are no more than local amplifiers of The Global Voice the owners try to sell us.

The Argentinian main media operator, owner of the 73% argentinian licenses share is Clarín. And they ought be charged mainly on ouster attempts they did against our elected President, in a no-yet-so-successful Colour Revolution they tried last year and that they still now try to carry out. Clarín is the Argentinian Fox News Obama's equivalent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A dangerous precedence, but necessary
Posted by: ProudLiberal1947 on Oct 27, 2009 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they confess to being yellow journalism. If they confess to being a arm of the Right Wing Hate Machine. If they confess that Sensationalism, distorted Facts, Half Truths and news Manipulation is what they are about. If they confess they are pundits and NOT REPORTERS or JOURNALIST, I say put them on 90 day probation they go back to their lying, manipulating ways yank their Licenses.

All of this would end if they brought back the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE and most of these WING NUTS would disappear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BS AND MORE BS
Posted by: shd1230 on Nov 1, 2009 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHAT UTTER UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]