Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Peggy Noonan Recalls When Bush Wrapped Himself in His Own Failure

Posted by Steve M., No More Mister Nice Blog at 7:48 AM on October 24, 2009.


It's as if she still can't face the fact that what we need to talk about is responsibility for what happened on 9/11.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Politics in your
mailbox!

 

It's hard to have a simple response to Peggy Noonan's opening paragraphs this week:

At a certain point, a president must own a presidency. For George W. Bush that point came eight months in, when 9/11 happened. From that point on, the presidency -- all his decisions, all the credit and blame for them -- was his. The American people didn't hold him responsible for what led up to 9/11, but they held him responsible for everything after it. This is part of the reason the image of him standing on the rubble of the twin towers, bullhorn in hand, on Sept.14, 2001, became an iconic one. It said: I'm owning it.

"I'm owning it." Noonan's partly right about that: after running scared on 9/11 and ducking the situation for a couple of days, Bush began on that Friday to act as if having presided over the worst act of terrorism ever on U.S. soil was a mark of virtue.

In retrospect, it's as if he was pleased about it -- proud of it. Eight years later, I can't help thinking he really was pleased: now he'd be consequential, rather than the no-account black sheep of his family.

It's true that he wasn't held responsible for what led up to 9/11 -- his administration and its propagandists took great pains to shift the blame to his predecessor -- but it's odd how Noonan puts that. She mentions responsibility for what went before (presumably so her right-wing base can think about how it's all Clinton's fault) and responsibility for what came after (it's OK now, if you're a Republican, to say bad things about Bush), but it's as if she still can't face the fact that what we need to talk about is responsibility for what happened on 9/11. Yes, I'm playing with words a bit -- but it's as if Noonan doesn't want to address the point that something unspeakably horrible happened that day -- and on whose watch? It's as if she can accept the build-up (all the fault of the Democrats) and the aftermath (so much failed Republican promise), but looking at the actual event is unthinkable. Which it wouldn't be if it had happened in a Democrat's administration; then failure to obsess over the awful day would be unthinkable.

Noonan pivots to Obama:

Mr. Bush surely knew from the moment he put the bullhorn down that he would be judged on everything that followed. And he has been. Early on, the American people rallied to his support, but Americans are practical people. They will support a leader when there is trouble, but there's an unspoken demand, or rather bargain: We're behind you, now fix this, it's yours.

President Obama, in office a month longer than Bush was when 9/11 hit, now owns his presidency. Does he know it? He too stands on rubble, figuratively speaking -- a collapsed economy, high and growing unemployment, two wars. Everyone knows what he's standing on. You can almost see the smoke rising around him. He's got a bullhorn in his hand every day.

It's his now. He gets the credit and the blame. How do we know this? The American people are telling him. You can see it in the polls. That's what his falling poll numbers are about. "It's been almost a year, you own this. Fix it."

"It's his now." The first eight months of Bush's presidency weren't his, and that's fine, but rubble from a collapse that began long before Obama became president is his rubble. Bush chose to own his rubble (actually, he chose to milk it for sympathy and to wave it like a bloody shirt that justified unrelated foreign adventurism, and inept adventurism than that). But Obama doesn't have agency. We tell him -- or, rather, Noonan, purporting to speak for us, tells him -- what's his responsibility and what isn't.

If you want to use a 9/11 metaphor for Obama, compare him to the people in charge of rebuilding on Ground Zero. Blame him for failing to get that job under way quickly enough. I blame him for not doing enough by now to rein in the fat cats, and not enough to jolt Main Street's economy until we can feel a pulse. And the public is, yes, blaming him for that, too. But, sorry, Peggy: it's not his rubble -- and the public knows that, even if this self-appointed spokeswoman for the public doesn't realize that.

55% Still Blame Bush for Economic Problems --Rasmussen, October 5, 2009

If even Rasmussen gets numbers like that, it's Bush's rubble, even if it's Obama's job to clean it up.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, obama, noonan

Steve M. blogs at No More Mister Nice Blog.


Tea-Parties so Diverse, They Had to Use the Same Black Guy in 5 Different Scenes of Tea-Bagger Movie
Really, you know a black tea-bagger named Nate?
Post by Oliver Willis. November 20, 2009.
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post
Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009.
Hmmm ... Why Do So Many Wingnuts Have Such an Obsessive Fear of Being Raped?
It's all they can talk about in the right-wing media.
Post by Staff. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Focus
Posted by: QQOblivion on Oct 24, 2009 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. I know Rove focus-grouped the idea of spinning 9-11 as a + for the Bush presidency -- just like he focus-grouped the idea of Bush acting arrogant as if he had a mandate, both after the 2000 election and the 2004 election.

And Americans ate it all up.
Stupid idiots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Israel didn't help engineer 9/11
Posted by: weathered on Oct 24, 2009 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they sure as hell were the cause of it as stated by 'terrorists to the bone'.

Only America and Israel were named as the target of 9/11 by those claiming responsibilty and for both its been a MIC windfall.

W/out 9/11 we wouldn't be in Iraq/Afgn.
W/out 9/11 we wouldn't be handcuffed to a patriot/homeland insecurity.

WE were set-up like a bowling pin and bushcon sodomized this once far better Country in broad daylight while MSM drove the getaway car.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ENOUGH PSYCHOBABBLE, MS. NOONAN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 24, 2009 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And nobody is wrapped in anything. I think the word you want is 'responsiblity'. Sept.11 happened and Bush seized the opportunity to use it to his advantage. He 'used' 9/11 as his reason to start two wars, both of which go on to this day and continue to be a huge drain on our economy. Bush appears to have had some kind of an awakening. He's back. Laura and George will 'motivate' people for the low, low price of $100 grand a pop. He's not sorry for anything and he has no regrests. I question how much of his presidency he actually remembers. Booze does that to people. As for Obama, well he's not wrapped in anything either. He sees the job for what it is, overwhelming. There is no parallel to be drawn from one to the other. No similarities. Bush's presidency is over, Obama has just started. As for 'owning' it, well let's just say that Obama sees the gravity of what he does everyday and is well aware of his responsibilites. Bush, never really cared and still doesn't. That's the biggest difference between the two men. I find the comparison to be unfair and without basis. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ENOUGH BUSH WORSHIP, MS. NOONAN Posted by: Sister_Lauren
If Barack ought to resist droppin' his 'g's,
Posted by: Longdream on Oct 24, 2009 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peg ought to resist trying to use her own pink, cloudy personal logic to draw political conclusions.

It's fun to make stuff up, but she should write fiction and leave politics to the big girls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Noonan is afraid of
Posted by: wwittman on Oct 24, 2009 10:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What Noonan and her right-wing loony friends are AFRAID of is the picture of Obama standing on the success of healthcare reform and owning THAT in the minds of the American people.

that's why they are trying as hard as possible to see that not happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]