Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Actually, Comparing Sonia Sotomayor to Sarah Palin Is Kind of Insulting

Posted by Jill Filipovic, Feministe at 12:20 PM on May 29, 2009.


No, Sotomayor is not getting Palin-ed.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Media and Technology in your
mailbox!

 

No, Sotomayor is not getting Palin-ed.

I’m the last person who is going to stand up for the media’s crappy treatment of Sarah Palin during the Presidential elections, but I do think intelligence and achievement are fair issues to bring up when considering an elected official or a Supreme Court justice. And while I don’t think Sarah Palin is dumb, do think it was pretty clear that she did not know the necessary basics to fulfill the role of Vice President (I also think it’s pretty clear that Bush didn’t know the necessary basics to fulfill the role of President).

It’s ridiculous to compare someone like Sarah Palin to someone like Sonia Sotomayor. Yes, they have both endured sexist attacks. But suggesting that they’re being attacked in the same unfair way? No. It’s a little more complicated than “Sarah and Sonia are both being called dumb.” The reality is that Sarah Palin was a governor with very limited political experience who sold her candidacy on her “values” and attacked intellectualism as “elitism.” Sonia Sotomayor has more experience than nearly any other current member of the Supreme Court at the time of their appointment. She got into Princeton by the sheer force of her hard work and intelligence — not an achievement that many (or even most) college students can claim. She graduated at the top of her class, and went on to Yale Law, where she was an editor of the Law Journal. She was appointed to the federal district court by George HW Bush, and then to the Second Circuit by Bill Clinton, where she penned hundreds of opinions and heard thousands of cases.

It’s a slap in the face to mention her name in the same sentence as Sarah Palin, let alone argue that the two women are intellectual equals. I have no desire to discuss Palin’s intelligence or to bring her down, but I’m confused as to why we’re bothering to bring her up here.

Add into that the fact that Sotomayor isn’t being attacked just on gender lines — the right-wing assault on her has been deeply racist. The argument that she’s “stupid” is both gendered and racialized — no white man with her legal pedigree would be called “stupid,” but you can bet that a man of color would.

She’s not being “Palin-ed.” She’s being subjected to racist, sexist attacks. We can address and respond to those on the merits without bringing Sarah Palin into it.

Digg!

Tagged as: gender, racism, obama, supreme court, sarah palin, sotomayor, sexist attacks

Jill Filipovic is a New York-based freelance writer and a law student at NYU. More of her writing is available online at her blog, Feministe.


The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Palin Getting Paranoid? Alaska Quit-Bull Bans Laptops, Cell-Phones During Speech
A national candidate?
Post by Staff. November 7, 2009.
Pat Boone Wants to Rid the White House of "Vermin"
Eliminationism much, Pat?
Post by David Neiwert. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
PALIN SHOULD NOT BE PART OF THE DISCUSSION
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 29, 2009 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's an insult to the Judge and to the rest of us. Anna

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rush Limbaugh's Comment was Racist as Well...
Posted by: Xynyx on May 29, 2009 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rush asserted that Obama was being a reverse-racist by appointing her... which was the same as saying, "She couldn't possibly simply have the necessary qualifications."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unfair to Palin -- how?
Posted by: astockton on May 29, 2009 6:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You all but say that Sarah Palin was unfit to be a heartbeat away from the presidency. How, then, was the media unfair to her for pointing that out?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Unfair to Palin -- how? Posted by: gathaiga
Which of these idiots was it insulting to??
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on May 30, 2009 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neither one of these imbeciles is qualified to be in the UNITED STATES government.

See this:

A REAL RACIST

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PALIN AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THIS WOMAN SAID
Posted by: joeocho88 on May 31, 2009 1:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Out of her own mouth, she says that an experienced Hispanic woman can make better decisions than white male judges.

The ONLY basis of comparison for her and Palin is that they are both WOMEN but they have NOTHING else in common.

This is as ignorant as suggesting that ALL people with Spanish surnames ARE THE SAME...

People have some very WEIRD STEREOTYPICAL IDEAS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WHAT THIS WOMAN SAID Posted by: zipper696
what's dumb is liberal irrelevance
Posted by: corylus on Jun 1, 2009 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comparisons of Sotomayor and Palin...is this really the current state of "liberal" dialogue? How can a website that identifies itself as progressive, and a columnist who presumptuously considers herself a feminist, waste space and time on such a worthless distraction as this? This "debate" speaks volumes about the ineffectual vapidity of AlterNet and why I've taken 99.99% of my reading time to other blogs and sites.

While the entire planet staggers under the bludgeons of rampant imperialism, while the ecosystems upon which we depend for life deteriorate with each passing second, America indulges the grand distraction of a meaningless debate on the reputations of a capitalist foot-soldier who will do nothing to promote equity (Sotomayor) and a moronic fundamentalist religious ideologue (Palin).

If Alternet and the author had any clue whatsoever, they'd be attacking the very basis of a culture that allows itself to be distracted by this sort of drivel. This debate is completely without merit or value, and anyone truly interested in moving the debate forward should see this for what it is: another useless distraction while the warlords and imperialists suck the planet dry.

Alternet is functioning very well as yet another uninspiring cog in the facilitative machinery designedt to delude us all into thinking we're debating important issues. How about debating the relevance of the entire U. S. government, including the corporate-beholden Supreme Court and the entire classist, racist judicial system of which both Palin and Sotomayor are proponents and participants? How about a debate on the entire criminal history of the U. S. Supreme Court and its cozy relationship with the corporate purveyors of death and poverty? From what I can see, both Sotomayor and Palin are fascists, and that's all we need to know.

Uck Falternet!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is the opposite of empathy?
Posted by: rickiey on Jun 2, 2009 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Objectivity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]