Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Priceless: 'English-Only' Supporters Hold Conference, Can't Spell 'Conference'

Posted by Lee Fang, Think Progress at 12:00 PM on June 22, 2009.


Speaking under a misspelled banner, right-wingers who want to make English the official language of the U.S. showed no sense of irony.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Immigration in your
mailbox!

 

On Saturday, Pat Buchanan hosted a conference to discuss how Republicans can regain a majority in America. During one discussion, panelists suggested supporting English-only initiatives as a prime way of attracting "working class white Democrats." The discussion ridiculed Judge Sotomayor for the fact that she studied children’s classics to improve her grammar while attending college. The panelists also suggested that, without English as the official language, President Obama would force Americans to speak Spanish.

One salient feature of the event was the banner hanging over the English-only advocates. The word conference was spelled “Conferenece.” View it here:

Pat Buchanan and Peter Brimelow

The panelists pressed on with their anti-bilingualism diatribe without noting the irony of the obvious misspelling on the banner:

PAT BUCHANAN: Judge Sotomayor is up there at school in New York, she gets a scholarship to Princeton, she’s graduated with all these big honors and awards they said she never won. What’s she doing there in the summer? They said her adviser told her to read children’s classics so she can learn English better. How do you graduate number one in Princeton if you’re in the summer and you’re reading Rumpelstiltskin and Snow White? [laughter] [...]

PETER BRIMELOW: I really do recommend the language issue because you know that polls better than immigration and affirmative action. Eighty-five percent of Americans say they would favor official language policy. The wonderful thing about this issue if you look at what’s going to actually happen here is you’re going to find that the Obama administration is going to gradually institute institutional bilingualism in the country. It’s going to be required to speak Spanish in key positions, the police force and so on. This is a direct attack on the American working class because they are not going to be bilingual.

ThinkProgress attended the event and obtained audio of the panel. Listen here:

Mocking Sotomayor’s struggle to learn English has become a habit for Buchanan. On CSPAN a few weeks ago, Buchanan tried to undermine Sotomayor’s qualifications by saying she had read Pinocchio as a part of her “college work.” Buchanan was referencing a New York Times article, which talked about how hard Sotomayor had to work to graduate at the top of her class from Princeton. The article stated that she “spent summers reading children’s classics she had missed in a Spanish-speaking home and ‘re-teaching’ herself to write ‘proper English’ by reading elementary grammar books.” Sotomayor never read children’s books as part of her “college work” and the books consisted of classics such as Huckleberry Finn and Pride and Prejudice -- not Snow White, as Buchanan contends.

Peter Brimelow, one of the panelists to the event, is the editor of Vdare.com. He has written extensively against immigration and has long advocated that the GOP must “appeal to its base: white Americans.” Brimelow has defended accusations that he writes and publishes white supremacist material by declaring his content to be merely “white nationalist.”

Digg!

Tagged as: affirmative action, pat buchanan, english-only, sonia sotomayor, peter brimlow, white nationalists


We Can Fix a Broken Immigration System... Here's How
Outside pressure is the key to finally winning this fight.
Post by Rachel LaBruyere. November 20, 2009.
News Flash: Christians Still Not Victimized by Hate Crimes Legislation
Nor, obviously, hate crimes themselves.
Post by Steven D.. November 19, 2009.
Tea Party Protests Get Violent in Arizona (Video)
When two Tea Partiers entered an area designated for those protesting their presence, they were assaulted with signs.
Post by Dawn Teo. November 17, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Probably none of those "morans" even noticed.
Posted by: sasquuatch55 on Jun 22, 2009 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pat Buchanan's Library
Posted by: robert.noll on Jun 22, 2009 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tragically, Pat Buchanan's library burned down over the weekend. Both books were completely destroyed. Sadly, he hadn't even finished coloring the second one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» High Five!!! Posted by: CanuckKid
» RE: Pat Buchanan's Library Posted by: Freticat
» RE: Pat Buchanan's Library Posted by: marletat
Idiots on parade...
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 22, 2009 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
n/c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

priceless!!!!!
Posted by: ellie on Jun 22, 2009 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
got past the artist, design team, banner company, the guys that hung the banner... the no one will notice crowd!!!!!

this kind of ignorance is rampant in text and getting worse... makes me nuts...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: priceless!!!!! Posted by: Dak
» RE: priceless!!!!! Posted by: Dak
» Have You Seen "Idiocracy"? Posted by: iolanthe
I cain't beeleeve youse guys...
Posted by: proudleftist on Jun 22, 2009 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see nuthing rong with the baner! Lookes jist fine to me.

Whut are you all cumplayning abut?

Buy the way, the Englush Only Conferenece was fun and we had a relly gud time. I got Pat Buckanun's ottograf!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» hilarious comment! Posted by: zola77
Hire "W"
Posted by: Hiroak on Jun 22, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP neads to hire George W. Bush as their new proofreaderer!!!

I hear he is currently unemployed and waiting to do some speachifying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hire "W" Posted by: blitzmesser
Spellcheck??
Posted by: Jennie on Jun 22, 2009 2:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did they never hear of spellcheck?

BTW I live in a country with 2 official languages - English and Te Reo Maori - and it really isn't a problem. Government messages are printed in both languages, and several more besides, and translaters must be provided in official situations eg. Parliament or courts of law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spellcheck?? Posted by: Freticat
» RE: Spellcheck?? Posted by: babs
Well....
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jun 22, 2009 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess when you can't deal with any of the actual problems your country faces... most of which your party had a hand in creating, why not worry about paranoid fantasy and the purity of a language few of you actually read or speak with true fluency to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well.... Posted by: Curio
» RE: Well.... Posted by: MT512
Sad decline
Posted by: Swatopluk on Jun 23, 2009 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time when the US provided official translations of its national anthem in all major (and some minor) languages spoken in the US and its territories, so even those citizens that not yet spoke English could join in a meaningful way (I have seen the Hawaiian version). Today the right demands a law that punishes the use of any non-English version of the same anthem.
If there should be any law then it should be one banning people that can't keep the tune from public performance (extra fines for "Jose, can you see?" ;-) )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somewhat indicative of their targeted "base"
Posted by: hardwroc on Jun 23, 2009 1:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a Fruedian indication of just exactly the group they aim their rhetoric to.
The undereducated, underinformed, fearful as a result of the endless barrage of blaming the minorities and immagrants for all of the countries ills.
Did illegal aliens run our industry into the ground? Did Mexicans over leverage our banks and give mortgages to people that were NOT qualified so they could reap obscene bonuses?
Was it a Mexican, that emptied our treasury to BUY votes in 2000? OR attack a country we had surrounded and quarantined over made up charges and threats?

Hint: NO ! It was republicans ! Maybe we could form an anti Republican program to save our nation.....something like "make Republicans speak in truths and NOT innuendo, disinformation, or outright lies"
That would help! And when one of the idiots spouts that Obama is going to "force Americans to speak Spanish", we don't listen, we slap him really hard and send him to a small room to think about his misbehavior.

And the idiots that have already accused Obama of "planning to take away our guns", they should be handed the costs of the policemans families now without a wage earner, to support for their disinformation campaign that brought about the nutjobs anxieties and explosion of needless violence, over NOTHING but GOP paranoia and fearmongering!

If you agitate a lynch mob, you are guilty of it's crimes!
Hear that BECK, LIMBAUGH, OReilly, and GOP/FOX?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bring on the Institutional Bilingualism!
Posted by: sboo_urns on Jun 23, 2009 11:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd rather have institutional bilingualism than institutional racism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sign Making
Posted by: BobNoxious on Jun 24, 2009 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, not only did some neo-con dope misspell a rather common English word, they hired a printer/signmaker who is so remarkably unprofessional that not only can he or she not spell, but cannot proofread or even turn on their spellcheck.
Absolutely hilarious from so many angles.
(Yes, I am a graphic designer. I know what I'm talking about.)

BTW - In reference to Peter Brimelow, "nationalist" is the new code word for neo-nazi. Uncle Pat has so many friends in low places.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More Hilarity Posted by: BobNoxious
» RE: Sign Making Posted by: Lilly
» RE: Sign Making Posted by: MT512
The Use of English
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jun 25, 2009 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not everyone loves language or finds its proper usage to be important. I come from a family in which the love of language was simply part of life. My parents, both of whom came from working class parents, were well-educated (thanks in part to the GI bill), and both of them stressed speaking well. All three of their children and most of their grandchildren learned to speak and write well.

It's interesting that none of us are particularly interested in having English become a national language. It's the beauty of the language itself that fascinates us. Like the rest of my family, I pretty much find most languages to be quite wonderful and believe that our American schools do a great disservice by not teaching foreign languages beginning in a very early grade. And although I do realize that grammar and spelling are somewhat arbitrary and not mandated by God, somehow I still see a certain loveliness in the rules that constitute "proper" English.

What strikes me about the English only people is that they don't really love English. They often have horrid grammar, can't spell, and have a very limited understanding of words with more than two syllables. It's some kind of pseudo patriotism that drives them, not an inherent fondness for the rules and cadences of English.

It's likely that many readers of Alternet have seen my posts correcting other posters' grammar. I get a lot of 1s and 2s for doing so, so I know people read them. I'm known at work for being the "grammar cop," and I've been called pedantic even by members of my own family, who are generally vigilant about their own use of the language.

The problem with poor writing that the public can see is that it makes one seem ignorant or, at the very least, careless. When a rightwing nutjob misspells a word, it's laughable, and we progressives can rally and say, "Hey! See how stupid they are!"

But here, in these blogs and even in articles, the very liberals who are making fun of the wingnuts are writing "it's" as a possessive, "alot" as a word, "Clinton's" as a plural, and, in the case of some bloggers, absolute garbage (think PurpleGirl) apparently on purpose. A very recent article from HuffPost here on alternet about Stanford's affair said, "The GOP is starting to look like a collection of Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale's out of Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter." ("Dimmesdale's" is a possessive, not a plural.)

It is, of course, fun to see those who champion English only making fools of themselves. But it also makes those of us who use poor grammar while poking fun at them look like hypocrites. Isn't that what we are saying about them? They want to speak English exclusively, but they can't use the language properly.

I'm well aware that my emphasis on good writing involves an opinion and not a virtue. There are many people who find good grammar far less important than I do, and there are even those (again, think PurpleGirl) who seem to purposely trash the language for some unknown reason. We're all entitled to our opinions, and I have no problem with anyone's disagreeing with mine. I'm simply making some observations.

And I do think the misspelled sign is hilarious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Use of English Posted by: iolanthe
» Great story! Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: Great story! Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: The Use of English Posted by: popham
» RE: The Use of English Posted by: inprov73
» RE: The Use of English Posted by: MT512
» RE: The Use of English Posted by: Collielady
» RE: The Use of English Posted by: Collielady
» I hate to be picky, but.... Posted by: babzter
Ain't Nobody Can't Spell No Good
Posted by: Lilly on Jun 25, 2009 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are speaking of a gang that disdains educated people ("elites"), hates teachers and professors, and wants to shut down the public school system. They champion homeschooling. Check out state requirements for the homeschooling parent; in some states you can be an 8th-grade dropout and still homeschool your kid in 12th grade. And no, a lot of the right-wingers can't spell. A lot of them can't write a coherent sentence. Here's a townhall posting as a sample:

"The debackle of moral intigerty have been given up in the name of mercy and grace."---Patrick, TX, 6-19-09 posted to townhall.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Conferenece
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 26, 2009 2:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because Republicans are idiots doesn't mean that having a common language and expecting everybody--including immigrants--to be at least minimally coherent is a bad idea. If you've ever had to deal with tech support, had a TA for a technical subject in a college course, or tried to explain to your landscaping service that they're digging up the wrong tree, you might know what I mean.

Ironically, the corporate wing of the Republican party is behind the outsourcing of call centers, and the use of cheap foreign labor in the technology, agricultural, service, and other sectors.

To me, the ability to speak English is a practical and useful criteria, assuming you're in favor of at least some controls around immigration. As a taxpayer, I'd even be in favor of throwing truckloads of free English textbooks over the fence. As soon as you learn it, you're in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Conferenece Posted by: Squarehead
» I'm all for... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: mayita1usa
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: mjglow
» English ain't all that easy... Posted by: mayita1usa
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: mjglow
» correction... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: MT512
» RE: I'm all for... Posted by: mjglow
» RE: Conferenece Posted by: iolanthe
» RE: Conferenece Posted by: oldstanzbiz
» RE: Conferenece Posted by: rinthy
That's Funny
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jun 26, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't care whooyar... That there's funny...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

popham.smith@gmail.com
Posted by: popham on Jun 26, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bravo to LeeannG. Your comments are right on target.
Having been educated in a British
territory, I am blessed to have a good command
of the English language.
English IS the official language of America.
I honor and respect all of its qualifications
to be the highest form of a written and spoken
language. It is indeed a shame that most
Americans view English as our base of
communication, but fail miserably, when it
comes to 'properly' using it as a most valuable
tool. I agree. The "conference" sign was pathetically hilarious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bobgalli
Posted by: bobgalli on Jun 26, 2009 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What’s even more amusing is these jingoistic buffoons haven’t a clue that pretty much all of the English language is derived from many others (egad - Arabic, too??? “You betcha). One need only open a dictionary (if available) and note the etymology [[ME ethimologie, fr L etymologia, fr. Gk. Fr. etymon + -logia – logy] (14 c)] of each and every word – many derived from Latin (the foundation of the Romance languages including, double-egad, Spanish), Greek, Sanskrit, you name it. In fact, I think it is fair to conclude very few words are truly ‘English’. For thos of you interested, Anu Garg has a daily e-mail entitled "A-Word-A-Day" (AWAD) which I find a good way to start the day. I don't have the URL but it's easy enough to find through your favorite search engine.
Best wishes to all
Bob

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bobgalli Posted by: MT512
» RE: bobgalli Posted by: cantenen
What's wrong with having an official language?
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jun 26, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nearly every other country has at least one. Those countries that have competing languages usually have a lot of friction between/among linguistic groups. At the very least, people who come here should expect to learn enough English to read simple signs and carry on a conversation. If that bothers you, I suggest that you go to Mexico or any other country where the language isn't English and try to demand your "rights" to have everything handed to you in English! Good luck with that!

And, BTW, considering how often Alternet articles contain misspelled words, or just wrong word choices (such as "bare" for "bear", "there" for "their", etc.), I wouldn't be too quick to ridicule the banner in question. Typos can occur in any setting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Pretty sure that was irony... Posted by: mayita1usa
What's Really Ironic
Posted by: pauldd on Jun 26, 2009 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that they would advocate for English only and at the same time ridicule a native Spanish speaker for using whatever tools available to improve her English grammar skills to attain her goals. In what universe is this a bad thing?

Do 85% really support making English the official language? Are there really that many cowardly xenophobes now? Who cares what language someone speaks unless you are the one who can't understand them? Why don't we learn a second or third language instead of forcing others to use only one? Too much demand on a brain devoted to knowing the latest sport stats or whose winning on Dancing With The Stars?

These people are bat-shit crazy and should be sent away. They are simply undeserving of the protections and privileges afforded to them by our Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's Really Ironic Posted by: MT512
Swiss Only
Posted by: scearfo on Jun 26, 2009 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SWISS ONLY!! SWITZERLAND FOR THE SWISS!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was good enough for Jesus!
Posted by: raginghormones on Jun 26, 2009 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey English was good enough for Jeezus!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Doente bee so dum! Posted by: zipper696
» RE: It was good enough for Jesus! Posted by: better vision
My southern Italian Immigrant Maternal Grandfather
Posted by: Bob Doublin on Jun 26, 2009 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Improved his English skills by solving crossword puzzles so Pat Buchanan: bocce me culo. What a putz. That sign just says it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» i love this comment Posted by: aislinnluv
Underestimating people's abilities
Posted by: Tereska on Jun 26, 2009 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I find more bothersome than the spelling mistake is Brimelows quote "This is a direct attack on the American working class because they are not going to be bilingual." Only the rich have the capibilty of mastering another language? I know plenty of poor people that are fluent in both English and Spanish, more so than the rich because they are interacting with spanish people more than insulated upper class whites.
What also bothers me is when people are so quick to blame a worker at a dunkin donuts or McDonalds for not speaking english well, what they should go hungry until they learn English? How about blaming the genius manager putting them in jobs dealing with customers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's what's wrong with having an official language
Posted by: mayita1usa on Jun 26, 2009 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'll probably find that most of the countries with official languages have them because at some point in their histories, they had to pick one or more of their multiple indigenous (and/or colonial) languages in which to do business. Many African countries, for example, have their colonial language (e.g. French, English, Portuguese) as an official language, even though it is not the lingua franca spoken on the streets. The U.S. is clearly not in this position now, but in fact, did you know that or awhile, back around 1776, German was a contender? Ben Franklin was involved in nixing the idea - can't remember the whole story, tho' I'm sure you can find it. But I digress.

To answer the question: What's wrong with having an official language? I maintain that the only thing having an official language would do in the U.S. is generate a great deal of the friction you speak of, and for no good reason:

First, it's ridiculous to think that English in the U.S. is going to lose its status when throughout the world it's becoming the one language people from different places can communicate in.

Second, it's also ridiculous to give Americans the idea that - despite my previous comment - English is the only language in the world that matters; our monolingualism and ignorance of the rest of the world are already the butts of myriad international jokes.

Third, history has proven that in the course of just two generations, not only do immigrants' children learn English, but they lose their heritage languages to a dismaying degree. (I'm a case in point: My paternal grandmother spoke only Finnish for her whole life in Washington state, but my father had forgotten most of it by the time I knew him - and I had to pay money to study it before going to Finland last summer.) Forcing English-only on children of immigrants only serves to alienate them from their parents, which at its worst leads to gang-banging and other antisocial behavior.

Fourth, of course English is necessary to do anything of significance in the U.S. - I doubt you'll find a single immigrant who would disagree with you on that, and most of them who can't speak it with fluency are in reality ashamed of the fact, whether or not they show it. (BTW, English is a horrible language to have to learn as a foreign language - I'm a teacher of it, I should know.) However, the reality is that we have lots of folks working and living here (many of them full-fledged citizens) who need help in languages other than English; denying them this help is only going to make things worse for our whole society, getting us nowhere useful in the end.

Surely there are other reasons one could add to this list, so I suggest we keep the big picture in mind before we go creating unnecessary, painful, and possibly damaging laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But a group of Mexican (American or not) are the
Posted by: lindawageck1 on Jun 26, 2009 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ones working in the back of the print shop who made the banner, you morons. If you want to see how illegal immigrants from Mexico have ruined a state, look at Texas and you'll see where you're going also.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "...ruined a state..."?? Posted by: mayita1usa
» illegals "ruined a state" ??? Posted by: zipper696
» RE: WTF? Posted by: pauldd
Pat Buchanan
Posted by: zipper696 on Jun 26, 2009 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seems ol' Pat is slipping back into his old fascistic ways again. After working on his "affable old Republican talking head" persona for a number of years and edging his way into the good graces of MSNBC and CNN the "creature" inside is gaining control once more.

Won't be long until he feels the need to plant a burning cross in the White House lawn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pat Buchanan Posted by: zeek2
Anyone ever experience how Americans tend to return the idea of official languages?
Posted by: Beck on Jun 26, 2009 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we were stationed in Germany, we encountered the merest handful of Americans who learned any German whatsoever. We lived near two huge US bases, the largest American population outside the continental US. We knew Americans who had lived there 10 years and still did not know how to say the easiest, most common greetings, or the numbers from one to ten, or basic food names, etc. We knew Americans who, after years in Germany, still tried to pay in German shops with "real" money, who refused to learn any of the customs, such as NOT blaring a stereo, not washing your car out front, quiet hours during certain times, that type of thing. It was embarrassing to be American there, and it was puzzling to eventually be regarded as either a German from another part of the country, or if we visited other German-speaking countries, to be thought of as actually German, all because I learned German while there to maybe a 6th-grade level. I feel quite certain that there is no other nationality so unwilling to learn about the country they're living in as Americans.

Okay, what are the reasons Americans don't HAVE to learn the language even after years in other lands, while those here from those lands have to learn ours? There must be some. We're also the United States of Rationalization. Oh, oh, I know! Because we saved their asses in WW II, right? What else?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These numbskulls
Posted by: willymack on Jun 26, 2009 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are probably the same sparrow-brains who pull bible scripture out their arses to suit any occasion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Official language
Posted by: catherinep on Jun 26, 2009 11:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got into a discussion with some conservatives who were complaining about people in the US not speaking English. I reminded them that the US does not have an official language, to which one said "If you can't say the pledge of allegiance, you're not American." I assume she meant in English. I just responded, "I'll discuss this with you when they take 'god' out of the pledge." It got me some dirty looks, but it was worth it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

glass houses and all that
Posted by: Evelyn on Jun 27, 2009 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"They said her adviser told her to read children’s classics so she can learn English better. How do you graduate number one in Princeton if you’re in the summer and you’re reading Rumpelstiltskin and Snow White?"

Well, I usually cut people plenty of slack when they're talking off the cuff and their grammar isn't quite right. But under the circumstances of making fun of a bi-lingual person's work to perfect her English, I have to point out that the verb tense in there isn't quite right, Pat. It should be "so she could learn English. Also, your prepositional phrase is badly misplaced--try "if you're reading Snow White in the summer. And, um, any possibly Freudian significance to your choice of "Snow White" as an example of what you think she might have been reading? And finally, whatever she did (and I'm sure it wasn't what Pat alleges here, apparently it worked. The bar exam doesn't give extra points for being bi-lingual, as far as I know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: glass houses and all that Posted by: ChaosN2Stars
Printers
Posted by: paflyer on Jun 27, 2009 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the sign was most likely printed by a small print shop manned by low wage illegal immigrants who don't spell very well. But still the conference people should have seen it. I doubt very many conferences print their own signs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Printers Posted by: Quannah
Oh Florida!!
Posted by: reinaldok on Jun 27, 2009 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few years ago this bi-lingual subject was
forcefully debated in the Florida legislature.
One of the great English only debaters made the profound pronouncement: "If English was good enough for Jesus Christ, It's good enough for me."
I thought that this was an urban legend, but apparently it was true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CRITICIZING SPELLING...
Posted by: bimasta on Jun 27, 2009 11:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is pretty lame. Bad spelling and atrocious grammar is to be found here on Alternet in abundance. Not only many of the comments, but many of the main articles would fail a high school English test. And the Alternet editors don't seem to have a clue. The problem is our failed educational system: we have raised two generations of illiterates, and it hurts us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CRITICIZING SPELLING... Posted by: peteralter
That is sooooo Priceless!!!!
Posted by: lee.fiore on Jun 28, 2009 12:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I worked for a Republican call center in WV for 4 months and one of the campaigns we had to try to raise funds for was the English as an official language folks...I love it!!!! I am going to post the pic and headline on my wall at Facebook.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inglitch onlie
Posted by: tap17x on Jun 28, 2009 12:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These assholes probably love GW Bush who wouldn't know Inglitch if it sat on his face.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A is for Apple B is for Bush's Bumpkins
Posted by: orwellturns on Jun 28, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When learning a second language as I had to, the best way to learn the basics are with children's books. Growing up in a different country, you often are not familiar with the fairy tales or common norms and mores of that new country. You do learn them by starting at the beginning.
Sometimes, a basically intelligent person trying to learn a new language becomes even more knowledgeable of that new country's history and social norms. So given that, it explains why so many people within a country often don't know their own history, especially if their parents were not educated themselves and didn't promote or encourage excellence in education. Therefore the Bush Bumpkins were created and God had nothing to do with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A is for Apple B is for Bush's Bumpkins
Posted by: orwellturns on Jun 28, 2009 1:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When learning a second language as I had to, the best way to learn the basics are with children's books. Growing up in a different country, you often are not familiar with the fairy tales or common norms and mores of that new country. You do learn them by starting at the beginning.
Sometimes, a basically intelligent person trying to learn a new language becomes even more knowledgeable of that new country's history and social norms. So given that, it explains why so many people within a country often don't know their own history, especially if their parents were not educated themselves and didn't promote or encourage excellence in education. Therefore the Bush Bumpkins were created and God had nothing to do with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A is for Apple B is for Bush's Bumpkins
Posted by: orwellturns on Jun 28, 2009 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When learning a second language as I had to, the best way to learn the basics are with children's books. Growing up in a different country, you often are not familiar with the fairy tales or common norms and mores of that new country. You do learn them by starting at the beginning.
Sometimes, a basically intelligent person trying to learn a new language becomes even more knowledgeable of that new country's history and social norms. So given that, it explains why so many people within a country often don't know their own history, especially if their parents were not educated themselves and didn't promote or encourage excellence in education. Therefore the Bush Bumpkins were created and God had nothing to do with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ooops, sorry for the triple post, Alternet please delete two.
Posted by: orwellturns on Jun 28, 2009 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Really Now!
Posted by: jmmartin on Jun 28, 2009 8:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, we don't want no Mexicans coming here spicken Mexican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Me gusta hablar Ingles con mis amigos...
Posted by: zigy on Jun 29, 2009 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...pero, yo se' solo Espanol. Deseo a habler "chinese" para a hablar con el jefe nueavo, pero no se' chinese . Hasta luego mis amigos; sera a otro pias con mas buena aire.

OK, OK... my Spanish is not that good... but I can speak fluent banksteres... credit default swaps, anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]