Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Do Nataline Sarkisyan and Britney Spears Have in Common?

Posted by Richard Blair, The All Spin Zone at 7:51 AM on March 15, 2008.


They were both treated at UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles. Except Natalie died due to bad decision making on the hospital's part.
nalexanderinsurancedeath071221.300w
Nataline Sarkisyan

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Health and Wellness in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Health and Wellness

Krugman Has a Problem with Sanjay Gupta
Melissa McEwan Shakesville

Obama Wants CNN's Sanjay Gupta to Be Surgeon General?
Nico Pitney Huffington Post

Selling 'Safer Cigarettes'?
Steve Benen Washington Monthly

They were both treated (or not, as the case may be) at UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles.

Just to refresh everyone’s memory, Nataline Sarkisyan was the young woman who, just before Christmas last year, was denied a liver transplant by her insurance company until it was too late. She died at UCLA Medical Center on the day that the transplant was approved.

And Britney Spears? Just to refresh everyone’s memory…oh…never mind. But she’s also been treated at UCLA Medical Center on various occasions. Britney gave birth there, and has also had a few encounters with staff in the psychiatric wing of the hospital.

The reason I bring up Nataline is that right after she died, I asked a simple question: why in the hell didn’t the hospital just do the transplant, and figure out the financials at a later time? I don’t believe that anyone at UCLA Medical Center was ever held to account for this lack of decision making that led, directly or indirectly, to the young woman’s death.

However, apparently some staff members at UCLA Medical Center were caught peeping in Britney Spears’ medical files - and have been fired for the offense:

UCLA Medical Center is taking steps to fire at least 13 employees and has suspended at least six others for snooping in the confidential medical records of pop star Britney Spears during her recent hospitalization in its psychiatric unit, a person familiar with the matter said Friday.
In addition, six physicians face discipline for peeking at her computerized records, the person said…

Listen, I’m the last person in the world who would make excuses for any medical personnel violating the privacy of any patient, celebrity or not, by snooping in patient records for prurient information. Anyone at UCLA Medical Center who wasn’t directly involved in treating Britney had no business prying into her personal records, and should have been fired when the discovery was made. That was the correct call. (Interestingly enough, it appears as if staff were fired, but not doctors. Go figure.)

Without even researching the topic, though, I’m absolutely certain that no one at UCLA Medical Center was disciplined for poor decision making in Nataline’s case. But then, she wasn’t a pop star going off the edge of sanity. She was simply a sick young woman caught up in the healthcare bureaucracy in America. No one was fired; in fact someone, somewhere, probably received a bonus for saving either the insurance company or the hospital money.

Wonderful priorities that we have here in this country, huh?

Digg!

Tagged as: health care, health insurance, spears, nataline sarkisyan, ucla medical center

Richard Blair is the blogmaster of All Spin Zone.


Krugman Has a Problem with Sanjay Gupta
As do a few other folks ...
Post by Melissa McEwan. January 7, 2009.
Obama Wants CNN's Sanjay Gupta to Be Surgeon General?
Gupta hosts "House Call" on CNN, contributes reports to CBS News, and writes a column for Time magazine.
Post by Nico Pitney. January 6, 2009.
Selling 'Safer Cigarettes'?
Something seems wrong with this picture.
Post by Steve Benen. January 2, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This has left everyone totally speechless!
Posted by: emccready on Mar 15, 2008 9:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
including myself...which Sicko! the movie does too if you have an ounce of compassion in your body!
This leaves me on the verge of weeping for the immorality of the medical system so many people buy into out of fears that are stoked by Insurance companies and the pharma industry.

Let's get the French, English, Dutch, Canadian, Swedish ....system into place and give it a chance... anything except no treatment at all (and so many people get just that in this country!) is better than what we have now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality Check
Posted by: kag123 on Mar 16, 2008 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do we continue to live in the World's riches country and yet put up the shit that those in power throws at us.We got to take back our country from those who destroy US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kind of ironic, isn't it, that
Posted by: ankhet on Mar 16, 2008 10:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the people who scared the heck out of you about the dangers of socialism and socialized medicine are the ones causing all these problems, killing people to save the "bottom line". Of all the health care systems I've experienced and studied, the American one is the most expensive, the most corrupt, the least efficient (unless you are rich), and the most hypocritical. Yay, private enterprise.

You can vote bad politicians out, but CEO's are untouchable. Remember that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Kind of ironic, isn't it, that Posted by: herronsmith