Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Admin on FEMA's Toxic Trailers: Screw the Poor!

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 6:46 AM on January 31, 2008.


The Bush Administration, FEMA and Governor Hailey Barbour -- just said screw the poor, let's build more casinos and luxury accommodations.
FEMA trailer hearings

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Health and Wellness in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Health and Wellness

How Do Obama and McCain Compare on Health Care?
Julia Eisman Stand Up for Health Care

Gaps in McCain's Health Plan
Kathleen Stoll Stand Up for Health Care

Health Care or Offshore Drilling? You Decide
Jane Hamsher Firedoglake

Remember those toxic FEMA trailers? Looks like folks in Mississippi hoping for more affordable housing to be built so that they can start to get back on their own feet again will have to keep on waiting.

The Bush Administration and FEMA -- along with former RNC head turned lobbyist turned Governor Hailey Barbour -- just said screw the poor, let's build more casinos and luxury accommodations. Again. I'm not kidding. Via Digby:

While thousands of Mississippians who lost their homes to Hurricane Katrina remain in FEMA trailers, the federal government on Friday approved a state plan to spend $600 million in grants earmarked for housing on a major expansion of the state-owned port -- a project that could eventually include casino and resort facilities.

[...]

The money in question is part of $5.5 billion in HUD Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) that Congress authorized for Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina struck on Aug. 29, 2005. Administered by the Mississippi Development Authority, about $3.4 billion was allocated to replace and repair some of the nearly 170,000 owner-occupied homes destroyed or damaged by the storm. Another $600 million was set aside for programs to replace public housing, help small landlords fix their units and foster construction of new low- and moderate-income housing.

Scout Prime has more. Well, what's wrong with being stuck in FEMA trailers because there is no where else to move to that these folks can afford? Here's what's wrong:

FEMA "ignored, hid and manipulated government research on the potential impact of long-term exposure to formaldehyde" on Katrina and Rita victims now living in the FEMA trailers, the congressmen wrote in a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, whose department includes FEMA.

Reps. Brad Miller (N.C.) and Nick Lampson (Tex.) cited agency documents given to Congress in alleging that the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- generally considered a repository of nonpartisan scientific expertise -- was "complicit in giving FEMA precisely what they wanted" to suppress the adverse health effects....

"Honest scientific studies don't start with the conclusion, and then work backwards from there," Miller said....

"For those who are too poor to live elsewhere, FEMA's position remains as it was in 2006: there are no possible adverse health effects that can't be cured by opening the windows," they added.

So, in sum, if there is no affordable housing because the grant money set aside for building it has been sucked up by big money donor casino interests, and if there is nowhere else for the very poor to live because said affordable housing does not exist in their location, and said very poor have no means of transportation to go elsewhere...it's okay if they are trapped in a carcinogenic, toxic trailer providedknowingly by our own government who has spent more effort suppressing evidence of the formaldehyde toxicity and protecting it's own employees from said toxicity than they have trying to resolve the lack of enough housing problem for their fellow Americans in need. Does that about cover it? (All of the preceding links in this paragraph are YouTubes from testimony and press briefings on this issue. And all are appalling.)

(H/T to reader WB.)

Digg!

Tagged as: barbour, bush administration, fema, hurricane katrina, fema trailers

Christy Hardin Smith is a former attorney, who earned her undergraduate degree at Smith College, in American Studies and Government, concentrating in American Foreign Policy. She then went on to graduate studies at the University of Pennsylvania in the field of political science and international relations/security studies, before attending law school at the College of Law at West Virginia University, where she was Associate Editor of the Law Review.


How Do Obama and McCain Compare on Health Care?
A new report from Families USA details their differences. And it's not good news for McCain.
Post by Julia Eisman. August 19, 2008.
Gaps in McCain's Health Plan
McCain touts consumer choice as a highlight of his plan, when, in fact, it would leave many with no choice at all.
Post by Kathleen Stoll. August 18, 2008.
Health Care or Offshore Drilling? You Decide
It's time to ask your representative: are you going to be with us on health care reform, or working to preserve the broken system?
Post by Jane Hamsher. August 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If you ain't rich, you ain't nothin'.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 31, 2008 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anybody really believe that you can get rid of the formaldehyde and benzine being outgassed by hundreds of square feet of particle board surrounding you, just a couple of feet from your nose and lungs, in a 'tiger box' of a trailer by simply opening the windows? Keep in mind that EVERYTHING used in the interiors of those trailers is synthetic – and outgassing. And, pray-tell, what does one do in the winter (it does get cold in the South) when, to heat the trailer (and, coincidentally, to accelerate the outgassing) the windows must be closed? Or in the summer, when air conditioning, with closed windows, is needed to keep from turning these trailers into tin-can saunas?

This reminds me just a little of the rosy pronouncements of the EPA and Sir Rudy Giuliani immediately after 9/11, when they declared the air around the World Trade Center site to be safe; and now we have hundreds of emergency workers coming down with serious, debilitating – and deadly – diseases.

(And, of course, we have the Agent Orange-sickened vets from Vietnam and the depleted uranium-sickened vets from the Gulf War that have each been denied treatment. And 41 million americans without health insurance. And one of the highest child-poverty and infant-mortality rates in the industrialized world.)

Screw the poor, hell; with this administration, it's screw EVERYBODY in the lower 99 percent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is news?
Posted by: Shey on Jan 31, 2008 6:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the previous poster, with the Bush administration it's screw everybody except the top (economically) 1-2 %.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is Reality Posted by: messedup
This administration
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...has been relentlessly protected by both Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate. Therefore I'm not advocating any longer for the impeachment of Bush&Cheney.
Instead, I'm calling for the impeachment of those protecting the president and his vice, from impeachment. That means letting Sen. Mitch McConnell (Republican) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Democrat) know that, since they've protected these two crooks in the White House, from what they have coming to them--they won't be needed in the House & Senate after this year. That, in lieu of impeachment--we're all (Democrats and Republicans) getting together to kick them out instead.

The Democrats are disgusted enough with their party to go along with this idea in droves. And so are the Republicans. The Independents of course, are also disgusted with both parties. This could get some legs and go far to teach these pigs at the public trough, that they'd BETTER spend their time doing the people's business, instead of lining their own fat pockets and protecting the moral polluters of this country, from their well-deserved punishment for all their high crimes and misdemeanors, that Bush & Cheney have coming to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]