Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

30 GOP Senators Vote to Defend Gang Rape

Posted by Charles Lemos, MyDD.com at 11:16 AM on October 8, 2009.


A new low, by any account.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Health and Wellness in your
mailbox!

 



It is stunning that 30 Republican members of the United States Senate would vote to protect a corporation, in this case Halliburton/KBR, over a woman who was gang raped. The details from Think Progress:

In 2005, Jamie Leigh Jones was gang-raped by her co-workers while she was working for Halliburton/KBR in Baghdad. She was detained in a shipping container for at least 24 hours without food, water, or a bed, and "warned her that if she left Iraq for medical treatment, she'd be out of a job." (Jones was not an isolated case.) Jones was prevented from bringing charges in court against KBR because her employment contract stipulated that sexual assault allegations would only be heard in private arbitration.

Offering Ms. Jones legal relief was Senator Al Franken of Minnesota who offered an amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations bill that would withhold defense contracts from companies like KBR "if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court."

Seems simple enough. And yet, to GOP Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions of Alabama allowing victims of sexual assault a day in court is tantamount to a "political attack" at Halliburton. That 29 others, all men, chose to join him in opposing the Franken amendment is simply mind-boggling.

Here are those who vote to protect a corporation over a victim of rape:

Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

In the debate, Senator Sessions maintained that Franken's amendment overreached into the private sector and suggested that it violated the due process clause of the Constitution.

To which, Senator Franken fired back quoting the Constitution. "Article 1 Section 8 of our Constitution gives Congress the right to spend money for the welfare of our citizens. Because of this, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote, 'Congress may attach conditions on the receipt of federal funds and has repeatedly employed that power to further broad policy objectives,'" Franken said. "That is why Congress could pass laws cutting off highway funds to states that didn't raise their drinking age to 21. That's why this whole bill [the Defense Appropriations bill] is full of limitations on contractors -- what bonuses they can give and what kind of health care they can offer. The spending power is a broad power and my amendment is well within it."

God I love it when Senator Franken quotes the Constitution. Not every Republican was so clueless. Ten voted for the Franken amendment including the GOP's female contingent of Senators (Snowe, Collins, Hutchinson and Murkowski).

"We need to put assurances into the law that those kind of instances [the Jamie Leigh Jones case] are not capable of being repeated," said Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who voted in favor of Franken's amendment. "I want to make sure that a woman, any individual who is a victim of a terrible act, knows that they have got protections."

Murkowski said that she considered the arguments that Sessions made about the amendment being too expansive before she decided to vote for the legislation.

"I looked at it," said Murkowski. "And, I tell you, you look at some of the things we do and you have to say, 'OK, you have a specific instance we're trying to address and does this go above and beyond?' But when you have to err on the side of protecting an individual, I erred on the side of greater generosity, I guess."

Republican Sen. George LeMieux of Florida echoed some of Murkowski's sentiments.

"I can't see in any circumstance that a woman who was a victim of sexual assault shouldn't have her right to go to court," LeMieux said. "So, that is why I voted for it."

Although Franken chatted up LeMieux on the Senate floor before the vote, LeMieux said that he had already made his decision. But, LeMieux added, Franken's talk didn't hurt.

"I had decided to vote for it before I came here, but I was happy to hear his argument for it," LeMieux said. "He did what a senator should do, which was he was working it. He was working for his amendment." I'll add, Al Franken is everything a United States Senator should be.

As for Jamie Leigh Jones, she was nothing but elated and thankful. "It means the world to me," Jones said of the amendment's passage. "It means that every tear shed to go public and repeat my story over and over again to make a difference for other women was worth it."

And for the GOP, it is a new low.

More from the Minn Post.

Digg!

Tagged as: gop, rape, kbr, jones, franken amendment


Senate Votes to Move Forward on Health-Care Bill: McCain Accuses Reid of Criminal Scheme
In debate leading to vote, McCain compared Reid to Madoff, Hatch invoked socialism, and Lincoln promised trouble ahead
Post by Adele Stan. November 21, 2009.
Video: Progressive Change Campaign Committee Robocalls For the Public Option
Anticipating GOP push-back on the Senate health-care bill's public option, PCCC marshals a show of support
Post by AlterNet Staff. November 20, 2009.
Americans Want a Health Surtax on Wealthy
An AP poll indicates majority support for a health surtax on the rich that's even stronger than the one in the House bill.
Post by Daniela Perdomo. November 18, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
they've been gang raping the country for almost 30 years
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 8, 2009 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they must figure, "what's one more?"

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am surpriesed at McCain's vote...
Posted by: EncinoM on Oct 8, 2009 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
given that he lived through torture, his failure to see the torture of an american women at the hands of her employer.

The amendment did not go far enough. Not only should funding be cut off to contractors that engage in such behavior and then seek to bury the incident in arbitration, but the laws should be change to grant US courts the jurisdiction to prosecute any of the alledged crimes committed from the rape and false imprisonment to the attempts to hinder its prosecution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So let me get this straight: ACORN gets thrashed but KBR/Halliburton
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Oct 8, 2009 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
retain their billions of dollars of no-bid contracts?

How fucked up! And can there be any lower form of life than the Republitards?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TX123
Posted by: TX123 on Oct 8, 2009 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How is it possible for an employment contract to prevent prosecution of a crime? KBR should be prosecuted for obstructing justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NICE WORK BIG AL!
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 8, 2009 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain, should be ashamed of himself along with the rest of them. Some of them must have daughters, most have wives. I don't understand what their reasons might be. I guess KBR and Halliburton have them all by the balls. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NICE WORK BIG AL! Posted by: gathaiga
Sin-ators
Posted by: QQOblivion on Oct 8, 2009 1:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see Sin-ator Vitter voted "no".
Let me guess, he and his fellow Repugnantcans have all been beating-off over all these thoughts of gang-rape.

They are almost no better than the rapists themselves. They would do the deed again to the victims if they could!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sin-ators Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Let's see what you've won
Posted by: inprov73 on Oct 8, 2009 3:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congratulation fellas, for living up to your reputations as low-life cretins and bottom-feeding scumbags you win an all expense two week vacation at the Maximum Security prison of our choice. You'll just love the facilities, especially the shower room. One suggestion - don't drop the soap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who needs terrorists ...
Posted by: Pebbles on Oct 9, 2009 2:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... when we have the thugs at KBR (both in Iraq and in their fancy stateside offices)? Or does it only count as terrorism when males are attacked?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is it even up for a vote?
Posted by: anok on Oct 9, 2009 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last time I heard, rape was illegal. Last time I heard, covering up a rape with threats to protect the rapists was illegal. Last time I heard conspiring with rapists to continue covering up the crime was illegal.

Last time I heard, government funds couldn't be granted to companies engaged in illegal activities.

Oh, wait, I forgot this is the US. That's a true sentiment for welfare recipients who got caught with a joint, but multi-billion dollar companies who gang rape it's employees? Nah, they're fine!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bought & Paid For
Posted by: chrlscoburn on Oct 9, 2009 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just certification of which Rethuglicans are wholly owned by Halliburton (Cheney; Inc). We're lucky that BlackWater is even being investigated - and you see what's come of THAT so far...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Republicans have no morals, ethics or common sense.
Posted by: thekidde on Oct 9, 2009 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain and the already known scumbags (Vitter, Ensign, al)need to be called out and then recalled. In 1968 in Vietnam, I threatened one of my own men with violence (my loaded M16) because he put his hand down a Vietnamese woman's blouse as his asshole buddies stood by laughing. Frankly, I wish I'd shot his ass, but then he would have gone home while the rest of us served our tours. What the fuck is wrong with these men? They need a bullet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Repiglicans, ya gotta love 'em
Posted by: bettyn on Oct 9, 2009 11:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Traitors to our country.
Abusers of women.
Lovers of greed...always greed.

Can they get any worse?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epiglicans, ya gotta love 'em Posted by: ConnecttheDots
In the service of the master
Posted by: That_SOB on Oct 9, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Harry Whittington's act of contrition upon being shot in the face by cheney says it all concerning the power of this evil man and his cronies/servants.
These people are walking black holes, as no light escapes from these monetary servants. I just hope there is a place these basturds pay for selling their souls (eternally!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do Any Of These Thirty Have Daughters?
Posted by: Eric.Arthur.Blair on Oct 9, 2009 5:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And did they stop to consider how they would feel if it happened to their own?

Of course not. How many of them even have daughters - or sons - on active duty? If they do, they should know better.

And McCain? Don't be surprised. He's just another ideologue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All-time low
Posted by: lamac66 on Oct 9, 2009 6:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the things republicans have opposed, this has to be the most reprehensible. Does ideology mean that much to them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paranoia? Conspiracy?
Posted by: luckypuck on Oct 9, 2009 8:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With SO many Senators protecting this band of thugs under such outrageous circumstances, there MUST be some kind of blackmail/bribery going on. Maybe Halliburton promised them a date at the next gangbang. Ooo! Maybe they ALREADY had a date and it got videotaped and that's why these Senators voted as they did.

Since they think gang rape is okay, maybe they could be sent to some federal prison where the inmates are like-minded. They could take turns. Poetic justice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DISGUSTING "NAY" VOTES
Posted by: on Oct 10, 2009 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although unsurprised by most of the names on the list of those hypocrites who voted against this fair, honest & necessary (not to mention long-overdue!) bill. What DID surprise me was the posting of the actual LIST of the cretins who placed those negative votes! I think this is a very important & useful precedent –– & I just hope it continues! Thanks for doing that. I made a hard copy of the list & plan to keep track of what other similar, awful & disgusting (yet predictible) votes they place in the future. Don't expect I'll have to wait very long before I can add a number of bad votes. Please NOTE that this may be just the beginning of a number of issues where the correct votes will beat 'em! Cheers & huzzahs.
m. swof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing
Posted by: ssbeeno on Oct 10, 2009 1:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like someone has them in their hip pockets! Bought and paid for its the American way!

RT
http://www.true-privacy.net.tc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These guys are all mysogynists.
Posted by: guidotg on Oct 10, 2009 4:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's what one should expect from hypocrites who blather about morality while having none of their own. Not one of them has any honor nor compassion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I love it...
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 11, 2009 12:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How brilliant to post their names in this article. Bad, bad people indeed. Each and every one of them is going to receive a special postcard from me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Defenders of false patriotism
Posted by: CitizenWhy on Oct 11, 2009 2:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans will always defend any company, however vile, that is part of its perpetual war machine.

Republican cynics, aided by careless Democrats, shift any focus on real economic issues back to the issue of "patriotism." That's why we have been been on a perpetual war footing for the past 30 years.

The economic issues Republicans want to bury: no job growth in the US for 20 years, shrinking income for most Americans, growing income inequality, how privatization increases taxpayer costs (including the privatization of health care), systematic fraud from Wall Street with government complicity, deliberately multiplying federal debt to prevent spending on a better social benefit system, growing debt used to finance the US economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP mindset requires that one NOT see another person's humanity.
Posted by: LightningJoe on Oct 11, 2009 4:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you DO see that the people you deal with have feelings, hopes and dreams, rather than just money to spend, you'll subvert your profit margin and be "out of the game" -- which is life, to a true profitist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NEVER AGAIN. NO REPUBLICAN SHOULD EVER RECEIVE A SINGLE VOTE.
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Oct 13, 2009 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let the democratic party be the new center. We now need a new party to the left of center. Most European democracies already have one. Some participate seriously in the national debate. Some hold office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Senator Al Franken
Posted by: wolfgangmo75 on Oct 14, 2009 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a proud Minnesotan today.

Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thus Be It Ever
Posted by: tomu4ia on Oct 14, 2009 7:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The title of this comment is the start of the second stanza of our National War Song (uh, anthem). In our short history, there were Americans who saw nothing wrong with 300 years of depraved slavery (ever wonder why there are so many hues of African Americans), stealing Native American lands while practicing genocide, lynching African Americans, preventing women from voting, maintaining glass ceilings for women in the work force, ad nauseum. Those Americans were not just politicians (Whigs, Republicans, Democrats) but common citizens like us. Thus be it ever that we Americans will not be the enlightened, humanitarian and egalitarian people of which we deceive ourselves in our history textbooks. Our Repuchs are just a reflection of the voids and depravities of our national soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A new low, but it gets lower every day!
Posted by: bondwooley on Oct 15, 2009 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even a few months ago, when this satire video was made, no one could have imagined that it would no longer be over the top.

Take That, GOP

(satire)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what are these people thinking?
Posted by: upsites1 on Nov 1, 2009 12:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wow, what are these people thinking? I am sure if it was their own family they would never support something like this. It would be interesting to know what the heck is influencing their vote in this direction.



acne surgery

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]