Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Stay Tuned For Blue Dog Hissy Fits This Week (And What Else is in Store on Healthcare)

Posted by mcjoan, Daily Kos at 9:45 AM on August 3, 2009.


A roundup of what too look for in the ongoing battle over healthcare reform on Capitol Hill.
bluedog

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Health and Wellness in your
mailbox!

 

With the House over one hurdle -- all three committees reporting legislation out, with Energy and Commerce bringing up the rear -- the week ahead will be a little less frenetic than the one that just passed. You could call it the week of the Blue Dogs.

By doing what they do best, throwing hissy fits to tie the entire Democratic caucus and leadership up in knots. Whether they do this out of real principle, because they like to exercise their clout, or because the longer they delay the process, the more money they rake in from industry -- and they rake in plenty -- that's their current role.

For all their talk of "fiscal responsibility," their efforts to weaken the public option in the E&C version of the bill "could actually increase the cost of the bill anywhere between $60 billion and $100 billion, wiping out all or most of the ostensible savings." The good news is that the Blue Dogs don't have the proportionate influence in the full House as they had on E&C, and that the CPC ia working hard at flexing their own muscle, and their numbers.

But there are still hurdles, not the least of which is the PR and lobbying firm organized harassment strategy they'll face in townmeetings back home this month:

This growing phenomenon is often marked by violence and absurdity. Recently, right-wing demonstrators hung Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-MD) in effigy outside of his office. Missing from the reporting of these stories is the fact that much of these protests are coordinated by public relations firms and lobbyists who have a stake in opposing President Obama’s reforms.

The lobbyist-run groups Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, which orchestrated the anti-Obama tea parties earlier this year, are now pursuing an aggressive strategy to create an image of mass public opposition to health care and clean energy reform. A leaked memo from Bob MacGuffie, a volunteer with the FreedomWorks website Tea Party Patriots, details how members should be infiltrating town halls and harassing Democratic members of Congress....

Hopefully they'll be as prepared for that as leadership has tried to make them with all the district-specific talking points they'll need. Meanwhile, the three committee chairs will work together to iron out differences from the three committee bills. That effort should include reconsidering the timeline for implementation of the good parts of the bill -- like the public option -- and the ending of things like exclusion based on pre-existing conditions ending before 2013. The CPC and other liberal caucuses are going to have their work cut out for them fighting to change that timeline.

Then there's the Senate, which remains in session this week. Gawd only knows what the week will bring, but it's highly unlikely to be a bill out of Finance, given all the missed deadlines thus far. Nonetheless, here's the latest promise from Baucus, well, as of Friday, anyway:

The chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, Max Baucus, has told colleagues he will press ahead with major health care legislation on Sept. 15 even if he does not have a bipartisan deal, Democrats said.

Given the nasty turn from Enzi and Grassley, and now the guy who dropped out of Baucus's negotiation group, Orrin Hatch, that's probably inevitable. If Baucus is actually capable of learning from experience. It's not as though his Republican buddies have made any bones whatsoever about making real reform a priority. They couldn't be more clear in their intent to kill it. It's official RNC policy, for chrissakes.

He's also got a lot of grumbling coming from what is ostensibly his side of the aisle. Leading the charge has been Jay Rockefeller, who first went public with his anger that SCHIP would be cut under the proposed Baucus Committee legislation. Then he took aim at the co-op option that the committee seems to have decided on as a substitute for a real public option. The only person that seems to really be committed to co-ops is Kent Conrad, who is spending an inordinate amount of time and energy trying to convince everyone that the public option is dead. Baucus's troubles don't end there. There's actual public discussion by Democratic Senators about taking his chairmanship away. In Senate-land, that's big news.

Finally, in case you missed it, here's some required reading on this whole process. In fact, here's an assignment: print it out and take it to a town meeting with your Senator or representative. It's Jonathon Alter's What's Not to Like?

I like the status quo on health care in the United States. I've got health insurance and I don't give a damn about the 47 million suckers who don't. Obama and Congress must be stopped. No bill! I'm better off the way things are....

Why should I be entitled to the same insurance that members of Congress get? Blue Dogs need a lot of medical attention to treat their blueness. I'm just a regular guy and definitely deserve less....

I prefer the status quo, where the for-profit insurance companies suck at the teat of the federal government. Corporate welfare's what we've got, and it's a damn good system. Through a wonderful program called Medicare Advantage, the insurance companies receive hundreds of billions of dollars in fees to administer a program that the government is already running. Don't touch that baby. You'd be messing with the handiwork of some fine lobbyists....

So tell your congressmen and senators when they're home for the summer recess that it's too soon to address this issue. We've only been debating it for 97 years, since Theodore Roosevelt put national health insurance in the Bull Moose Party platform of 1912. We've only had 745 congressional hearings on the subject (I made that number up, but it's got to be close). That's not enough! Let's study this problem more before we do anything about it.

Digg!

Tagged as: health insurance, max baucus, blue dogs, jay rockefeller, jonathan alter, americans for prosperity, kent conrad, public option, healthcare reform, freedomworks


What Does it Mean to Take Sarah Palin and the Tea-Bagger Set "Seriously"?
I know we're supposed to, but ...
Post by Joshua Holland. November 24, 2009.
Gun Lobby's Absurd New Claim: Healthcare Reform Will Take Away Your Guns
Gun Owners of America is sending action alerts warning that the Senate health care bill could "jeopardize their ability to obtain a firearms license."
Post by . November 23, 2009.
Is Taxing Plastic Surgery Sexist?
Part of the funding for the Senate's health care bill will come from a 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgery, on procedures overwhelmingly obtained by women.
Post by Jill Filipovic. November 23, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Health Plan is not for citizen's benefit
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Aug 4, 2009 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republicans want no change for their friends in insurance corporations. It's OK to profit off the sick. It's what Fascism is all about.

Democrats want to give the insurance corporations even more wealth (trillions like the banks). Will they be international too? Tax payers pay for it. It is just another cronism ploy to rob us for the elite few.

Congress has turned their backs on us acting like they want better care for us. They don't give a dam.

Trillions for health care when we already pay the most for our care (mostly lack of care) than anyone in the developed countries.

Trillions for unending wars of aggression for corporate interests.

Trillions for bank bailouts which are international and not traceable.

Billions and counting for refunds to junk gas guzzling cars. Doesn't matter that few cars are American made. The profits go off shore. Our government paid to "off shore" our automobile industry (Canadian plant using our Niagara Falls power, Mexico producing the Ford Fiesta, etc.).

Congress and this President are very generous with our money. We are more generations out paying off the debt. Do I see a "Reagan ghost" who cares only about himself and his cronies in the swamp called DC? Might they be robbing and destroying us for globalism (union breaking, polluting, debtor nations, unending wars, etc.).

A play on words when they talk about care for all under their "reforms". Like the "financial crisis of Wall street and big international banks" it is robbery.

Single Payer without insurance companies is what the people demanded. Now the leaders twist it to be a new wheel when it is not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ummm...fine post! But you forgot to add one teeny fact:
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Aug 4, 2009 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Long before they generously took up arms to fight the public option for their constituents, House and Senate members made certain that THEY THEMSELVES had the same health coverage that they're so intent on denying to the rest of us.

Get new candidates and RECALL THESE BASTARDS (Yes, the Constitution does indeed provide that option; the bastards just never hope we undereducated citizenry ever find out about it.)

Get those Recall Petitions against the DemoPublicans going, NOW. We need what we thought we voted for in November--REAL Democrats. Not these DemoPublicans, these things in drag.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]