Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
The Problem With The Public Option Is That It Lowers The Cost Of Health Insurance
The main goal of health care reform is to lower the cost of health insurance. Apropos, Olympia Snowe thinks that the problem with a public health insurance option is that a public option would... wait for it... lower the cost of health insurance:
In an Associated Press interview in Portland, Snowe said it would be unfair to include a government-run health insurance option that would take effect immediately."If you establish a public option at the forefront that goes head-to-head and competes with the private health insurance market ... the public option will have significant price advantages," she said.
Well, duh. That is the whole point. You can't lower the price of health insurance unless you start offering lower-priced health insurance. It's a tautology.
So, naturally, during the fight to lower the price of health insurance, so-called moderate Senators think that the problem with the public option is that it would... lower the price of health insurance. While it may be news to so-called moderate Senators, protecting the crappy products of large corporations is not their job description.
It is pretty amazing that many moderates and industry figures are actually arguing that the problem with including a public option in health care reform legislation is that a public option would lower the cost of health insurance. Clearly, they have a different view of the purpose of health care reform than most Americans.
Tagged as: olympia snowe, public option
Chris Bowers was a full-time editor at MyDD from May 2004 until June 2007. Some of his projects have included the creation of the Liberal Blog Advertising Network, the first scientifically random poll of progressive netroots activists, the Use It Or Lose It campaign, the nation's most accurate forecast of Democratic house pickups in 2006, and the 2006 Googlebomb the Elections campaign.
| Also in Health and Wellness | |||
| House Will Take Up-or-Down Vote on Stupak Amendment, Threatening Women's Rights The House leadership bows to anti-choice congressmen, allowing them a vote on an anti-choice amendment to the health-care bill. Post by RH Reality Check. November 7, 2009. |
If Tea-Baggers Are Such Populists, Why not Vent Fury Over Flu Shots Going to Wall Street While Kids Go Without? Or maybe their anger is misdirected. Post by Jill C.. November 7, 2009. |
At Least 5 Need Government-Run Health-Care at Bachmann's Angry Protests Against Government-Run Health-Care Milbank. Post by Joshua Holland. November 6, 2009. |
|
EMAIL
PRINT
29 COMMENTS
PERMALINK