Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Congress Catches the Bus on Public Transportation

Posted by Amy Traub, Open Left at 4:56 AM on July 18, 2008.


The House passes the Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act.
transit13lores

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Just about every politician out there would like to find the quick fix for the soaring gasoline prices that are straining the budgets of America's current and aspiring middle class. We know a gas tax "holiday" a la John McCain won't have any real impact on consumers. We know a miscellany of proposed new locations to drill for oil won't help for years -- if ever. And while those stimulus checks may have been somewhat useful in offsetting the prices at the pump, Americans facing hard times also need the cash to pay for the rising price of everything else under the sun.

So the question remains: how are we going to get to work today - and tomorrow -- without the cost of the commute eating a huge chunk out of the paycheck?

For a growing number of Americans, the answer is to hop the train. "Even regions that have traditionally resisted giving up cars and have limited access to mass transit are reporting a surge in public transportation use," according to CNN. And it's little wonder. Even before the price of gas reached its current peak, American households that relied on public transportation saved an average of $6,251 a year compared to a two-car household without transit access. (pdf)

These days the commuter train makes more sense than ever.

So transit ridership is up, but that presents its own challenges. How can transit systems keep up with the increased demand at a time of declining public revenues? Beyond that, how can systems expand to better serve besieged drivers who live nowhere near the tracks?

Here's where those eager politicians can actually do something useful. State and local budgets are strapped (just ask Mayor Karl Dean of Nashville) but the feds can stimulate the economy, help middle-class Americans get to work affordably, and reduce greenhouse gases and other air pollution by providing more funding for mass transit.

That's just what the House has done with the recently passed Saving Energy Through Public Transportation Act. According to our analysis on TheMiddleClass.org, the bill "authorizes $1.7 billion in funds for Fiscal Year 2008 and Fiscal Year 2009 for public transit agencies to reduce fares and expand services. Additionally, the legislation increases the federal government's share of the cost for grants for alternative fuel transit equipment from 90% to 100% and for constructing additional parking facilities at end-of-the-line stations from 80% to 100%."

The hitch is that the bill is an authorization, not an actual appropriation of federal funds. That means Congress hasn't made the difficult choices about how - or if - they will offset the increased spending. And we still lack the comprehensive national transportation plan the country needs. Still, after years of subsidizing costly and polluting car travel, it's good to see Congress on the right track.


The Best Convention Speech You Missed
Montana's Governor Schweitzer electrified the convention with his energy speech.
Post by Josh Dorner. August 28, 2008.
The Battle to Save Coal River Mountain
This is a plan that even coal companies should want to embrace.
Post by JW Randolph. August 27, 2008.
Shock Jock Encourages Listeners to Waste Energy to Wipe Out DNC's Green Efforts
Glenn Beck is a lunatic.
Post by Matt. August 25, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is a great start
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jul 18, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most important question, should transit be a right, and lowering fares and increasing capacity comes a belief that it is.

Transit planning and urban planning have to go hand and hand. Right now, for so many cities, the transit is designed for commuters to funnel them to job centers, typically a downtown or central business district (CBD). However, in the car era, employment centers have decentralized, and often sought cheaper lands in further from the CBD. We have to work to have better suburb to suburb transportation, we need to plan job centers in the suburbs to be transit friendly, and the timing of the transit to these locals have to serve not just the 9-5ers but also the support staff that work in the evenings.

We also have to consider as a nation or society, do we want people to live in rural America. In Norway, they have active policies to try and encourage that people live throughout the country, not just concentrated in urban centers. With typically lower wages, and higher energy costs for transportation, do we need to look at policies that will provide them with credits to offset the increased burden that transportation is putting on their family budgets. I would think we would want to limit credits to families living and working in rural communities, not those that work in the city and commute 40+ miles by choice from rural areas, plus they would be served by increased transit spending.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]