Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The End of the Hummer Era?

Posted by GottaLaff , The Political Carnival at 2:31 PM on June 3, 2008.


GM is closing four plants and considering selling the Hummer brand.

CNN: The average price for gasoline is $3.98 a gallon.

The New York Times is reporting that GM is closing four plants:

Responding to a consumer shift to more fuel-efficient vehicles, General Motors said Tuesday that it would stop making pickup trucks and big S.U.V.s at four North American assembly plants and would consider selling its Hummer brand.

The moves, announced Tuesday by the company chairman, Rick Wagoner, will slash 500,000 units from the automaker’s overall production, and pave the way for increased investment in smaller cars and passenger vehicles. Within three years, he said, trucks will account for less than 40 percent of the vehicles that G.M. produces in North America, down from about half today.

Mr. Wagoner said that rising gasoline prices had forced a “structural shift” by American consumers away from truck-based vehicles built by G.M.

Six months ago, this happened:

SAN FRANCISCO, California, November 16, 2007 (ENS) - The Bush administration's fuel economy standards for many sport utility vehicles, minivans and pickup trucks have been rejected by a federal appeals court because they set a zero value on reducing emissions of carbon dioxide that cause global warming.
If only fuel economy standards had been acknowledged by BushCo as a vital part of the effort to fight global warming, if only BushCo had hoisted itself out of the Dark Ages and realized that global warming was, you know, a reality, if only BushCo didn't have self-interest as their singular motivation, then GM might have adapted early enough to avoid this.

If only I weren't retreating into my own little fantasyland of If Only's.

If only the 2000 election had...

If only the 2004 elec--

If only...

Digg!

Tagged as: energy, fuel, cafe standards


A Nasty, Four-Letter Word for Our Energy Crisis
Coal. It is time to kick the habit, starting with Michigan.
Post by Bruce Nilles. October 9, 2008.
Palin Still Gets Global Warming Backwards and Repeats Big Energy Lie Twice
The debate showed she still can't get her talking points right on this issue.
Post by Dr. Joseph Romm. October 3, 2008.
Palin Used Exxon, Oil Industry-Funded Scientists for Global Warming Study
No wonder her science is a little fuzzy.
Post by Tara Lohan. October 1, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
well....
Posted by: foreverhope on Jun 3, 2008 3:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A block from my apartment GM just built an enormous grand new showroom and a huge car lot that takes up almost an entire city block filled with SUVs. I don't understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: well.... Posted by: AlterEg0
» RE: well.... Posted by: zipper696
If only the U.S. auto makers....
Posted by: xconservative on Jun 3, 2008 3:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
didn't find themselves behind the curve and trying to catch up....as usual.

Honestly, couldn't they see this coming?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They are Paid Not to See What is Coming Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
Bovine Scatology
Posted by: OldRedleg on Jun 3, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that GM has finally gotten the excuse it needed (and probably planned for) to close down a bunch of its domestic plants because they want to do the Wal-Mart thing and move more operations overseas to much cheaper, less safe, and less regulated countries. I seriously doubt that the American consumer will see an equivalent reduction in the cost of the GM automobiles, but hundreds of thousands of American workers will either lose their jobs or have to settle for a serious degradation in their standard of living so the GM executives and their "preferred" stock holders will get their coveted bonuses and dividends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demand Destruction
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 3, 2008 8:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What you are witnessing is demand destruction at work. Even the overly inbred will no longer feed the monsters at $4/gallon. Like was said above, the sad part is the loss of good jobs for so many, but GM is to blame. They have missed and and not been ready for any of the oil shocks that have hit the US since the Oil Embargo back in 1974.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once upon a time...
Posted by: adp3d on Jun 4, 2008 3:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..the people that owned and bought pickup trucks were people that had a reason to own one, like farmers and contractors. Heck, you can say that the SUV was born when the new Ford Explorers debuted in the movie "Jurassic Park". It is totally ridiculous to see these "Urban Assault Vehicles" parked at the mall and at Starbucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X PAT OBSERVER
Posted by: davy on Jun 4, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DUMB AND DUMBER HAVE BEEN RUNNING THE AMERICAN CAR INDUSTRY FOR YEARS, WHY IS ANYONE SURPRISED. sheeeeesh !!! A HUMMER, couldn't EVERYONE have seen that coming ???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ITS ABOUT TIME
Posted by: billgee on Jun 4, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Big 3 have reached the end of their Rope.
Let them hang themselves high.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They've been here before Posted by: DanoM
No they are not dead, our expected way of life is.
Posted by: zorba1 on Jun 4, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "big" three will move offshore as thousands of other companies have, and continue to build vehicles in China at 80 cents an hour with no pensions or bothersome enviromental laws or regulations.
Then ship them to America virtually duty free and make billions more for themselves.
When will America start waging heavy import fees on all companies who closed shop in America and fled offshore?
Untill those companies and industries are hit with heavy import fees the bleeding will not stop.
Pittsburgh has gone from 1 million people to 300,000 with about 70,000 abandoned homes, Cleveland and other heavy industry cities are in the same poor condition.
Any hope in new industies for these cities have been dashed by the huge speculative runup in oil, heating oil, diesel, propane, gasoline, natural gas and electrical costs.
Seniors, the disabled, the poor and the unemployed are worried sick about how to pay for cooling and transportation this summer and heating this coming winter.
I hear no talk of how these people will be helped.
Bush has cut subsidies for all programs to help the poor and aged every year for the last four years to help pay for his wars.
I expect more deaths due to heat and cold this Summer and Winter.
The cancer of the rust belt is rapidly spreading nationwide, we are all vulnerable.
I do not know why there are no mass protests, what happened to us Americans?
I'm a Nam vet and i protested that war, after seeing it was another lie.
The degree to which we are free is the degree to which we fight for those freedoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Engine Charlie Wilson turning 300,000 rpm
Posted by: 8 nontheist on Jun 4, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reports that there was an earth quake at the cemetary where the late & unlamented GM exec, cabinet member, loud mouth, buck passer Charlie Wilson was planted are false; engine Charle is just turning in his grave. The Japanese firms are displacing GM & the USA's auto & truck industries at the top of the heap.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If i could buy the Hummer brand
Posted by: zorba1 on Jun 4, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would make the frame Aluminum, the body light weight composite, yank the engine and tranny, fill it with lithium batteries, add an electric motor, drop the center of gravity and all wheel drive and have a dandy electric.
Add regenative downhill coasting and braking.
Maybe a hybrid with a 20 HP engine which could run on methane and/or hydrogen, as a side model for extended range.
Anyways you get the point, almost any vehicle can be made into a greenie with enough bucks and tinkering.
That is my problem and most everyone else stuck with a gas guzzler, the required moola.
I cannot sell my gas guzzling SUV and do not have the income to buy a Prius or anything else which gets better fuel mileage.
We are Senior citizens on a fixed disability income. There is nothing left in our "budget" to cut.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You should of thought Posted by: mindtrvlr
» RE: You should of thought Posted by: zorba1
Big cars scream,"I fear that i'm inadequate"
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jun 4, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On so many levels,this is good news,Hummers are big,ugly,extremeely wasteful ,and make the driver appear arrogant.A more reductivist, Freudian analysis would point to male impotence fears (and certainly this looks accurate,when applied to a famous UK motoring-loving, "personality").However for me,thats just another unfair stick,with which to beat the Hummer..which is a really fun activity.
Without the Hummer,and its ilk,would the US and it's lackey's have gone to war in Iraq ?...maybe,but not until at least 2050.
The only downside to the switch from the Ug-mobile ,is the loss of work,for the employees.However history shows,that when one outdated industry closes,new industries take their place.The employers usually use this as a chance to erode the wages,skills and benefits which the workers of former industries fought for.
In the US,which,is pretty ropey,when it comes to fairness,this is a danger,for workers, their families and communities.If a bit of social planning was allowed (i'll be branded a Maoist for that suggestion),then a switch to a new sector could be managed with training,mutual co-operation and investment in people.
Investment in greener vehicles,green technology,greener services would be a logical step forward.I don't know if Emporer Murdoch and the other US rulers, will allow it though?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can You Imagine......
Posted by: needlefoot on Jun 4, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....where we might be now if both the car industry and consumers followed through with the design and purchase of smaller, fuel-efficient cars in the 1970's. Perhaps we would not now be facing an oil crisis. Perhaps we would not be in Iraq. Perhaps we would not be contemplating the destruction of our wilderness areas.

We really do reap what we sow.

Diane

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bobby Decker AKA THE ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE PURPLERAIN MAN
Posted by: Bobby Decker on Jun 4, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" I LIKE TO THINK THERE CALLED HUMMERS.....CAUSE THATS HOW THOSE PEOPLE PAID FOR THEM !........I GUESS BLOW JOB ON WHEELS WAS ALLREADY TAKEN ! ? "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GM GETS WHAT THEY DESERVE
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Jun 4, 2008 4:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CEO'S of GM are a bunch of idiots. They should have been building better gas saving vehicles 30 years ago for the general American public. But hell no, they build a gas guzzling giants for the Elite to drive. That's the same kind of thinking the Bush administration has.
Do everything for the rich and the hell with the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on Jun 4, 2008 6:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know who they are.They are family, coworkers, friends, associates.They are the SUV drivers
probably nice people who love to drive big gas hogs to compensate for their feelings of fear , impotence and inadequacy in the face of the current dictatorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I AGREE Posted by: mindtrvlr
GM won't change
Posted by: zipper696 on Jun 4, 2008 7:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They will simply do more of their cut price badge engineering and import smaller, more economical cars from the various Japanese and Korean car manufacturers they have part ownership in already rebadged as Chevys or Dodges.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trade
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Jun 4, 2008 8:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GM OUGHT TO TRADE THEIR WORTHLESS HUMMERS TO THE ARABS FOR OIL

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Trade Posted by: zorba1
If only....
Posted by: YoungbloodG on Jun 9, 2008 10:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GM had ANYONE in their upper executive offices who had brains and, perhaps, lived thru the 1970s and that decade's gas crisis... Perhaps they would have wisely passed up the chance to buy the Hummer production line in the first place, and instead decided to continue and expand production and marketing of the EV-1, a perfectly useful and popular electric vehicle....
(Check out the documentary, "Who Killed the Electric Car?")

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]