Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

There Is No Such Thing As Clean Coal

Posted by Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! at 12:00 PM on May 23, 2008.


The Coal industry is spending $35 million to convince us otherwise.
coalpowersmall

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Environment in your
mailbox!

 

"Most people know coal isn’t clean, but that hasn’t stopped the coal industry from trying to convince us otherwise."
-- Kevin Grandia of DeSmogBlog, introducing the website Coal is dirty!, a "Clean Coal Body Slam" created in collaboration with Greenpeace USA and the Rainforest Action Network to combat a massive P.R. onslaught from the coal industry

The magic words, it appears, are "carbon capture and sequestration." I don't think you want to know any more about them than I do, but I'm afraid we may be hearing them a lot, unfortunately from people who are trying to sell us bogus or at least wildly exaggerated science indicating that with these new technologies coal can be made clean and safe. It appears that they're prepared to spend tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars to sell their message.

This drives the folks we trust on environmental and energy issues bonkers -- naturally including our go-to webguy A Siegel, who's waxing rapturous today on his Energy Smart blog about the Coal is dirty! site and its star-studded roster of environmental researchers, activists, and journalists. As Siegel says, "Kevin might not have a $35 million budget but he has a team worth millions in terms of quality."

Kevin Grandia explains:

In essence, this site exists to sell the idea that coal is dirty. Pretty easy to do when you consider the facts and clear out the rhetoric. Like the fact that mercury emissions from coal fired-power plants continues to rise and that carbon capture and storage remains an elusive pipe dream that will take another 40 years to deploy on a commercial scale.

Siegel notes that the new site is already going gangbusters, with:

  • A section of 10 Coal Hard Facts, starting with "Coal increases rates of disease" ("According to the American Lung Association, 24,000 people a year die prematurely because of pollution from coal-fired power plants. And every year 38,000 heart attacks, 12,000 hospital admissions and an additional 550,000 asthma attacks result from power power plant pollution")
    Ask Dr. Coal, with "straight talk about coal and your family's health"
  • A section of Coal Myths (including "Carbon Capture and Sequestration Is a Myth")
  • And a debut "top story," "How Clean Coal Cooks Your Brain," by Jeff Goodell, acontributing editor at Rolling Stone and author of Big Coal: The Dirty Secret Behind America’s Energy Future, from which Siegel highlights this "critically true point":
    In the end, the “clean coal” campaign is about using the tools of the 21st century to keep us locked in the 19th century. Like other greenwashing campaigns, it’s about using the iconography of sexy technology and down-home Americana to maintain the status quo.

    The goal is not to solve our problems, but to perpetuate our addiction …

    After decades of stoking the engines of denial and obfuscation on global warming, it’s nice that Big Coal wants to be a good citizen. But just because your pusher decides to shower and shave, don’t delude yourself into thinking that he cares about your welfare.

Digg!

Tagged as: coal, energy, clean coal


Poll Watch: Zogby Gives McCain 5-Point Lead; Sky Not Yet Fallen
A major grain of salt is needed.
Post by Joshua Holland. August 20, 2008.
Global Warming Deniers Cancel Meeting Due to Tropical Storm Fay
Global warming intensifies tropical storms and, apparently, irony.
Post by Amanda. August 19, 2008.
San Francisco Helps Houston Get its Recycling Out of the Garbage
San Francisco to help "sister-city" Houston, home of Exxon, get its recycling program out of the garbage.
Post by Stephen Elliott. August 18, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Carbon sequestration" actually means oxygen sequestration
Posted by: don_alejandro on May 24, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing no one ever mentions about so called "carbon sequestration" is that a more accurate name would be "oxygen sequestration." Carbon, as coal, is already safely sequestered in a stable form. If coal is mined and CO2 is captured and sequestered, the net result would be the removal of oxygen from the atmosphere.

The Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition has long used the mantra "There is no such thing as clean coal" since it is so obviously true. The coal industry is also test marketing the idea of "carbon neutral coal," which sounds a bit like dehydrated water. Check out OVEC's mountaintop removal mining galleries to see what mtr looks like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Worse than that Posted by: frantaylor
No Such thing as Clean Nuclear either..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 25, 2008 10:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just the process of mining Uranium is hugely polluting and costs lives..pollutes water ways and air..but they are pushing this fable of clean nuclear..a total lie..clean clean like Chernobyl..or Harrisburg Penn. you mean..?

Is guess it's according to what you mean by clean clean like a frat house bath room, or clean like a Microsoft clean room..which clean to you mean..Jean..?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Technology can solve issues with coal
Posted by: ydaldlom on May 26, 2008 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A company named Thermoenergy Corp. (TMEN) has developed an effective patented process (ThermoEnergy Integrated Power System or TIPS) to convert coal and other hydrocarbon fuels into energy with zero air emissions. This process captures carbon dioxide in liquid form so it can be sequestered and reused. They are currently working on a pilot plant with Babcock Power. The future looks good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Coal At All
Posted by: billgee on May 28, 2008 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Technology doesnt have the time.
We Dont have any time

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]